Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions Delivered in Routine Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: This review presents a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of routinely delivered psychological therapies across inpatient, outpatient and University-based clinics. This was a pre-registered systematic-review of studies meeting pre-specified inclusion criteria (CRD42020175235). Eligible studies were searched in three databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycInfo. Pre-post treatment (uncontrolled) effect sizes were calculated and pooled using random effects meta-analysis to generate effectiveness benchmarks. Moderator analyses were used to examine sources of heterogeneity in effect sizes. Overall, 252 studies (k = 298 samples) were identified, of which 223 (k = 263 samples) provided sufficient data for inclusion in meta-analysis. Results showed large pre-post treatment effects for depression [d = 0.96, (CI 0.88-1.04), p ≤ 0.001, k = 122], anxiety [d = 0.8 (CI 0.71-0.9), p ≤ 0.001, k = 69], and other outcomes [d = 1.01 (CI 0.93-1.09), p ≤ 0.001, k = 158]. This review provides support for the effectiveness of routinely delivered psychological therapy. Effectiveness benchmarks are supplied to support service evaluations across multiple settings.

SUBMITTER: Gaskell C 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9832112 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

The Effectiveness of Psychological Interventions Delivered in Routine Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Gaskell Chris C   Simmonds-Buckley Melanie M   Kellett Stephen S   Stockton C C   Somerville Erin E   Rogerson Emily E   Delgadillo Jaime J  

Administration and policy in mental health 20221006 1


This review presents a comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of routinely delivered psychological therapies across inpatient, outpatient and University-based clinics. This was a pre-registered systematic-review of studies meeting pre-specified inclusion criteria (CRD42020175235). Eligible studies were searched in three databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycInfo. Pre-post treatment (uncontrolled) effect sizes were calculated and pooled using random effects meta-analysis to generate effective  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC11543797 | biostudies-literature