Dataset Information

Differences in aortic valve area measured on cardiac CT and echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

A certain proportion of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) present with discordant grading between different diagnostic modalities, which raises uncertainty about the true severity of AS. The aim of this study was to compare the aortic valve area (AVA) measured on CT and echocardiography and demonstrate the factors affecting AVA discrepancies.

Methods

Between June 2011 and March 2016, 535 consecutive patients (66.83±8.80 years, 297 men) with AS who underwent pre-operative cardiac CT and echocardiography for aortic valve replacement were retrospectively included. AVA was obtained by AVA on echocardiography (AVAecho) and CT (AVACT) using a measurement of the left ventricular outflow tract on each modality and correlations between those measures were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting the discordance for grading severe AS.

Results

The AVACT and AVAecho showed a high correlation (r: 0.79, P <0.001) but AVACT was larger than the AVAecho (difference 0.26 cm2, P <0.001). By using the cut-off values of AVACT (<1.2 cm2) and AVAecho (<1.0 cm2) for diagnosing severe AS, the BSA (odds ratio [OR]: 68.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.45-849.99; P = 0.001), AVAecho (OR: 1.19, 95%CI: 1.14-1.24; P <0.001), tricuspid valve morphology (OR: 2.83, 95%CI: 1.23-6.50; P = 0.01), and normalized annulus area (OR: 1.02; 95%CI:1.02-1.03; P <0.001) were significant factors associated with the discordance between the AVAecho and AVACT.

Conclusion

Patients with larger BSA, AVAecho, and annulus, and tricuspid valve morphology were associated with the AVA discordance between the echocardiography and CT. Complementary use of CT with echocardiography for grading severe AS could be helpful in such conditions.

SUBMITTER: Choe J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9858019 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Differences in aortic valve area measured on cardiac CT and echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis.

Choe Jooae J Koo Hyun Jung HJ Choi Se Jin SJ Lee Seung-Ah SA Kim Dae-Hee DH Song Jong-Min JM Kang Duk-Hyun DH Song Jae-Kwan JK Kang Joon-Won JW Yang Dong Hyun DH

PloS one 20230120 1

<h4>Background</h4>A certain proportion of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) present with discordant grading between different diagnostic modalities, which raises uncertainty about the true severity of AS. The aim of this study was to compare the aortic valve area (AVA) measured on CT and echocardiography and demonstrate the factors affecting AVA discrepancies.<h4>Methods</h4>Between June 2011 and March 2016, 535 consecutive patients (66.83±8.80 years, 297 men) with AS who underwent pre- ...[more]

PMID: 36662795

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsSevere aortic valve stenosis (AS) is defined by an aortic valve area (AVA) <1 cm2 or an AVA indexed to body surface area (BSA) <0.6 cm/m2, despite little evidence supporting the latter approach and important intrinsic limitations of BSA indexation. We hypothesized that AVA indexed to height (H) might be more applicable to a wide range of populations and body morphologies and might provide a better predictive accuracy.Methods and resultsIn 1298 patients with degenerative AS and preserved ejection fraction from three different countries and continents (derivation cohort), we aimed to establish an AVA/H threshold that would be equivalent to 1.0 cm2 for defining severe AS. In a distinct prospective validation cohort of 395 patients, we compared the predictive accuracy of AVA/BSA and AVA/H. Correlations between AVA and AVA/BSA or AVA/H were excellent (all R2 > 0.79) but greater with AVA/H. Regressions lines were markedly different in obese and non-obese patients with AVA/BSA (P < 0.0001) but almost identical with AVA/H (P = 0.16). AVA/BSA values that corresponded to an AVA of 1.0 cm2 were markedly different in obese and non-obese patients (0.48 and 0.59 cm2/m2) but not with AVA/H (0.61 cm2/m for both). Agreement for the diagnosis of severe AS (AVA < 1 cm2) was significantly higher with AVA/H than with AVA/BSA (P < 0.05). Similar results were observed across the three countries. An AVA/H cut-off value of 0.6 cm2/m [HR = 8.2(5.6-12.1)] provided the best predictive value for the occurrence of AS-related events [absolute AVA of 1 cm2: HR = 7.3(5.0-10.7); AVA/BSA of 0.6 cm2/m2 HR = 6.7(4.4-10.0)].ConclusionIn a large multinational/multiracial cohort, AVA/H was better correlated with AVA than AVA/BSA and a cut-off value of 0.6 cm2/m provided a better diagnostic and prognostic value than 0.6 cm2/m2. Our results suggest that severe AS should be defined as an AVA < 1 cm2 or an AVA/H < 0.6 cm2/m rather than a BSA-indexed value of 0.6 cm2/m2.

Dataset Information

Differences in aortic valve area measured on cardiac CT and echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Differences in aortic valve area measured on cardiac CT and echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets