Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Personalized matched targeted therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: a pilot cohort analysis.


ABSTRACT: Despite progress, 2-year pancreatic cancer survival remains dismal. We evaluated a biomarker-driven, combination/N-of-one strategy in 18 patients (advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer) (from Molecular Tumor Board). Targeted agents administered/patient = 2.5 (median) (range, 1-4); first-line therapy (N = 5); second line, (N = 13). Comparing patients (high versus low degrees of matching) (matching score ≥50% versus <50%; reflecting number of alterations matched to targeted agents divided by number of pathogenic alterations), survival was significantly longer (hazard ratio [HR] 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.078-0.76, P = 0.016); clinical benefit rates (CBR) (stable disease ≥6 months/partial/complete response) trended higher (45.5 vs 0.0%, P = 0.10); progression-free survival, HR, 95% CI, 0.36 (0.12-1.10) (p = 0.075). First versus ≥2nd-line therapy had higher CBRs (80.0 vs 7.7%, P = 0.008). No grade 3-4 toxicities occurred. The longest responder achieved partial remission (17.5 months) by co-targeting MEK and CDK4/6 alterations (chemotherapy-free). Therefore, genomically matched targeted agent combinations were active in these advanced pancreatic cancers. Larger prospective trials are warranted.

SUBMITTER: Shaya J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9860045 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Personalized matched targeted therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: a pilot cohort analysis.

Shaya Justin J   Kato Shumei S   Adashek Jacob J JJ   Patel Hitendra H   Fanta Paul T PT   Botta Gregory P GP   Sicklick Jason K JK   Kurzrock Razelle R  

NPJ genomic medicine 20230120 1


Despite progress, 2-year pancreatic cancer survival remains dismal. We evaluated a biomarker-driven, combination/N-of-one strategy in 18 patients (advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer) (from Molecular Tumor Board). Targeted agents administered/patient = 2.5 (median) (range, 1-4); first-line therapy (N = 5); second line, (N = 13). Comparing patients (high versus low degrees of matching) (matching score ≥50% versus <50%; reflecting number of alterations matched to targeted agents divided by numbe  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3472758 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4575601 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5426481 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4367627 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5721980 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3316920 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC9623986 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4988311 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9556149 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8693262 | biostudies-literature