Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Necrotizing Otitis Externa (NOE) based on radiologic studies.Methods
The PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases were searched. True-positive and false-negative results were extracted for each study. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.Results
The included studies contained data on 37 studies diagnosed with NOE. The sensitivity of gallium-67, technetium-99m, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was 0.9378 (0.7688-0.9856), 0.9699 (0.8839-0.9927), and 0.9417 (0.6968-0.9913), respectively. For Computed Tomography (CT), the positive criteria consisted of bony erosion alone and bony erosion plus any soft tissue abnormality. The sensitivity of CT based only on bony erosion was 0.7062 (0.5954-0.7971); it was higher 0.9572 (0.9000-0.9823) when based on bony erosion plus any soft tissue abnormality.Conclusion
The diagnostic sensitivity of technetium-99m, gallium-67, and MRI was favorable. On CT, the presence of bony erosion may be a useful diagnostic marker of NOE, but the diagnostic sensitivity will be even higher if the criterion of any soft tissue abnormality is also included; however, care should be taken when interpreting the results. Our study demonstrates the potential utility of radiology studies for diagnosing NOE, but their lack of specificity must be considered, and standardized anatomic criteria are still needed.Level of evidence
2A.
SUBMITTER: Kim DH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9874358 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan-Feb
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Kim Do Hyun DH Kim Sung Won SW Hwang Se Hwan SH
Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology 20211026 1
<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the diagnostic accuracy of Necrotizing Otitis Externa (NOE) based on radiologic studies.<h4>Methods</h4>The PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar databases were searched. True-positive and false-negative results were extracted for each study. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.<h4>Results</h4>The included studies contained data on 37 studies diagnosed with ...[more]