Dataset Information

Rare diseases, common barriers: disparities in pediatric clinical genetics outcomes.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Identifying a precise genetic diagnosis can improve outcomes for individuals with rare disease, though the resources required to do so may impede access and exacerbate healthcare disparities leading to inequitable care. Our objective was therefore to determine the effect of multiple sociodemographic factors on the yield of the diagnostic evaluation for genetics outpatients.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study from 2017 to 2019 of outpatient genetics referrals at a pediatric academic tertiary care center. Exposures included: primary language, insurance type, and neighborhood resources (via the Childhood Opportunity Index, COI). The primary outcome was identification of a genetic diagnosis within 2 years of the initial clinic visit.

Results

COI quintile was not significantly associated with the odds of diagnosis but was significantly associated with clinic attendance, with lower neighborhood resources leading to incomplete referrals. Limited English proficiency was associated with a higher odds of diagnosis, though at an older age. Public insurance was associated with increased access to genetic testing.

Conclusions

Lower neighborhood resources are negatively associated with clinic attendance. Our findings further suggest delays in care and a referral bias for more severe phenotypes among families with limited English proficiency. Improved access to clinical genetics is needed to improve diagnostic equity.

Impact

The resources required to identify a genetic diagnosis may impede access and exacerbate healthcare disparities leading to inequitable care. In an analysis of pediatric outpatient genetics referrals, we observed a significant association between neighborhood resources and clinic attendance but not diagnostic yield for those attending, and a higher diagnostic yield for families with limited English proficiency, suggesting referral bias for more severe phenotypes. Thus, the primary barrier to finding a genetic diagnosis was initiation of care, not the ensuing diagnostic odyssey. Further research efforts should be directed at increasing access to clinical genetics evaluations for children with rare disease.

SUBMITTER: Wojcik MH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9892172 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Rare diseases, common barriers: disparities in pediatric clinical genetics outcomes.

Wojcik Monica H MH Bresnahan Mairead M Del Rosario Maya C MC Ojeda Mayra Martinez MM Kritzer Amy A Fraiman Yarden S YS

Pediatric research 20220813 1

<h4>Background</h4>Identifying a precise genetic diagnosis can improve outcomes for individuals with rare disease, though the resources required to do so may impede access and exacerbate healthcare disparities leading to inequitable care. Our objective was therefore to determine the effect of multiple sociodemographic factors on the yield of the diagnostic evaluation for genetics outpatients.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a retrospective cohort study from 2017 to 2019 of outpatient genetics referrals a ...[more]

PMID: 35963884

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesIdentifying drivers of complex traits from the noisy signals of genetic variation obtained from high-throughput genome sequencing technologies is a central challenge faced by human geneticists today. We hypothesize that the variants involved in complex diseases are likely to exhibit non-neutral evolutionary signatures. Uncovering the evolutionary history of all variants is therefore of intrinsic interest for complex disease research. However, doing so necessitates the simultaneous elucidation of the targets of natural selection and population-specific demographic history.MethodsHere we characterize the action of natural selection operating across complex disease categories, and use population genetic simulations to evaluate the expected patterns of genetic variation in large samples. We focus on populations that have experienced historical bottlenecks followed by explosive growth (consistent with many human populations), and describe the differences between evolutionarily deleterious mutations and those that are neutral.ResultsGenes associated with several complex disease categories exhibit stronger signatures of purifying selection than non-disease genes. In addition, loci identified through genome-wide association studies of complex traits also exhibit signatures consistent with being in regions recurrently targeted by purifying selection. Through simulations, we show that population bottlenecks and rapid growth enable deleterious rare variants to persist at low frequencies just as long as neutral variants, but low-frequency and common variants tend to be much younger than neutral variants. This has resulted in a large proportion of modern-day rare alleles that have a deleterious effect on function and that potentially contribute to disease susceptibility.ConclusionsThe key question for sequencing-based association studies of complex traits is how to distinguish between deleterious and benign genetic variation. We used population genetic simulations to uncover patterns of genetic variation that distinguish these two categories, especially derived allele age, thereby providing inroads into novel methods for characterizing rare genetic variation driving complex diseases.

Dataset Information

Rare diseases, common barriers: disparities in pediatric clinical genetics outcomes.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Impact

Publications

Rare diseases, common barriers: disparities in pediatric clinical genetics outcomes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets