Dataset Information

An Adjusted Treatment Comparison Comparing Amivantamab Versus Real-World Clinical Practice in Europe and the United States for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Insertion Mutations.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Patients with advanced, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with Exon 20 insertion mutations (Exon20ins) have poor prognoses, exacerbated by a previous lack of specific treatment guidelines and unmet need for targeted therapies. Amivantamab, an EGFR and MET bispecific antibody, demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with Exon20ins following platinum-based therapy in CHRYSALIS (NCT02609776; Cohort D+). Since CHRYSALIS was single-arm, individual patient data (IPD)-based adjusted analyses versus similar patients in real-world clinical practice (RWCP) were conducted to generate comparative evidence.

Methods

RWCP cohorts were derived from seven European and US real-world sources, comprising patients fulfilling CHRYSALIS Cohort D+ eligibility criteria. Amivantamab was compared with a basket of RWCP treatments. Differences in prognostic characteristics were adjusted for using inverse probability weighting (IPW; average treatment effect among the treated [ATT]). Balance between cohorts was assessed using standardized mean differences (SMDs). Overall response rate (ORR; investigator- [INV] and independent review committee-assessed [IRC]), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS; INV and IRC) and time-to-next treatment (TTNT) were compared. Binary and time-to-event endpoints were analyzed using weighted logistic regression and proportional hazards regression, respectively.

Results

Pre-adjustment, baseline characteristics were comparable between cohorts. IPW ATT-adjustment improved comparability, giving closely matched characteristics. ORR (INV) was 36.8% for amivantamab versus 17.0% for the adjusted EU + US cohort (response rate ratio [RR]: 2.16). Median OS, PFS (INV) and TTNT were 22.77 versus 12.52 months (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47; p < 0.0001), 6.93 versus 4.17 months (HR: 0.55; p < 0.0001) and 12.42 versus 5.36 months (HR: 0.44; p < 0.0001) for amivantamab versus the adjusted EU + US cohort, respectively. Results were consistent versus EU- and US-only cohorts, and when using IRC assessment.

Conclusion

Adjusted comparisons demonstrated significantly improved outcomes for amivantamab versus RWCP, highlighting the value of amivantamab in addressing unmet need in patients with advanced EGFR Exon20ins NSCLC following platinum-based therapy.

Trial registration

CHRYSALIS: NCT02609776.

SUBMITTER: Chouaid C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9988783 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

An Adjusted Treatment Comparison Comparing Amivantamab Versus Real-World Clinical Practice in Europe and the United States for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Insertion Mutations.

Chouaid Christos C Bosquet Lise L Girard Nicolas N Kron Anna A Scheffler Matthias M Griesinger Frank F Sebastian Martin M Trigo Jose J Viteri Santiago S Viteri Santiago S Knott Craig C Rodrigues Bernardo B Rahhali Nora N Cabrieto Jedelyn J Diels Joris J Perualila Nolen J NJ Schioppa Claudio A CA Sermon Jan J Toueg Raphael R Erdmann Nicole N Mielke Janka J Nematian-Samani Mehregan M Martin-Fernandez Cristina C Pfaira Innocent I Li Tracy T Mahadevia Parthiv P Wolf Jürgen J

Advances in therapy 20230118 3

<h4>Introduction</h4>Patients with advanced, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with Exon 20 insertion mutations (Exon20ins) have poor prognoses, exacerbated by a previous lack of specific treatment guidelines and unmet need for targeted therapies. Amivantamab, an EGFR and MET bispecific antibody, demonstrated efficacy and tolerability in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with Exon20ins following platinum-based therapy in CHRYSALIS (NCT026 ...[more]

PMID: 36652175

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is a representative oncogenic driver mutation. Only about 12% of EGFR mutation patients have the exon 20 insertion mutation, which is the third most frequent mutation among EGFR mutation NSCLC. Amivantamab, an EGFR and MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) bispecific antibody, was approved for NSCLC patients with the EGFR exon 20 insertion (E20I) mutation. In this study, we described the real-world, single-center efficacy and safety data of amivantamab in E20I mutation patients.MethodsThis study included metastatic NSCLC patients with EGFR E20I mutations. From January 2018 to June 2022, patients with EGFR E20I mutations who were treated with amivantamab were analyzed at Samsung Medical Center as part of the clinical trial or the early access program (EAP). We collected the patients' characteristics [age, sex, smoking history, location of mutation, sites of metastasis, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status, etc.] and analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) stratified by PD-L1 expression status, co-mutation such as tumor protein p53 (TP53), and metastasis sites.ResultsA total of 42 patients were analyzed, of which 16 patients were enrolled in the phase 1 study, and 26 patients received amivantamab through EAP. There were 14 (33%) patients with partial remission, 18 (43%) patients with stable disease, and 10 (24%) patients with disease progression. The objective response rate (ORR) was 33%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 76%. PFS was analyzed by dividing the near and far loop for 31 patients whose mutation location was known. The two groups had no statistically significant difference in PFS [median (range): 11.8 (2.3-21.3) vs. 11.3 (3.4-19.2) months, P=0.69]. For 29 patients with TP53 mutation data, there was no significant difference in PFS between the two groups [median (range): 5.9 (0-18.0) vs. 12.6 (6.9-18.3) months, P=0.11]. When analyzing PFS in 37 patients with PD-L1 expression data, PD-L1 (+) patients showed a poor prognosis [median (range): 11.3 (5.0-17.6) vs. 19.5 (5.3-33.7) months, P=0.04; hazard ratio (HR), 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20-0.98].ConclusionsThe efficacy of amivantamab was confirmed for the real-world population for EGFR E20I-mutated NSCLC. PD-L1 status could be a poor predictive factor, which should be further validated.

Dataset Information

An Adjusted Treatment Comparison Comparing Amivantamab Versus Real-World Clinical Practice in Europe and the United States for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Insertion Mutations.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration

Publications

An Adjusted Treatment Comparison Comparing Amivantamab Versus Real-World Clinical Practice in Europe and the United States for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Activating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Exon 20 Insertion Mutations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets