Dataset Information

Costing recommended (healthy) and current (unhealthy) diets in urban and inner regional areas of Australia using remote price collection methods.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To compare the cost and affordability of two fortnightly diets (representing the national guidelines and current consumption) across areas containing Australia's major supermarkets.

Design

The Healthy Diets Australian Standardised Affordability and Pricing protocol was used.

Setting

Price data were collected online and via phone calls in fifty-one urban and inner regional locations across Australia.

Participants

Not applicable.

Results

Healthy diets were consistently less expensive than current (unhealthy) diets. Nonetheless, healthy diets would cost 25-26 % of the disposable income for low-income households and 30-31 % of the poverty line. Differences in gross incomes (the most available income metric which overrepresents disposable income) drove national variations in diet affordability (from 14 % of the median gross household incomes in the Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory to 25 % of the median gross household income in Tasmania).

Conclusions

In Australian cities and regional areas with major supermarkets, access to affordable diets remains problematic for families receiving low incomes. These findings are likely to be exacerbated in outer regional and remote areas (not included in this study). To make healthy diets economically appealing, policies that reduce the (absolute and relative) costs of healthy diets and increase the incomes of Australians living in poverty are required.

SUBMITTER: Zorbas C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9991756 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Costing recommended (healthy) and current (unhealthy) diets in urban and inner regional areas of Australia using remote price collection methods.

Zorbas Christina C Brooks Ruby R Bennett Rebecca R Lee Amanda A Marshall Josephine J Naughton Shaan S Lewis Meron M Peeters Anna A Backholer Kathryn K

Public health nutrition 20210921 3

<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the cost and affordability of two fortnightly diets (representing the national guidelines and current consumption) across areas containing Australia's major supermarkets.<h4>Design</h4>The Healthy Diets Australian Standardised Affordability and Pricing protocol was used.<h4>Setting</h4>Price data were collected online and via phone calls in fifty-one urban and inner regional locations across Australia.<h4>Participants</h4>Not applicable.<h4>Results</h4>Healthy diets ...[more]

PMID: 34544513

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMaintenance dialysis is a costly and resource intense activity. In Australia, inadequate health infrastructure and poor access to technically skilled staff can limit service provision in remote areas where many Aboriginal dialysis patients live. With most studies based on urban service provision, there is little evidence to guide service development. However permanent relocation to an urban area for treatment can have significant social and financial impacts that are poorly quantified. This study is part of a broader project to quantify the costs and benefits of dialysis service models in urban and remote locations in Australia's Northern Territory (NT).MethodsWe undertook a micro-costing analysis of dialysis service delivery costs in urban, rural and remote areas in the NT from the payer perspective. Recurrent maintenance costs (salaries, consumables, facility management and transportation) as well as capital costs were included. Missing and centralised costs were standardised; results were inflated to 2017 values and reported in Australian dollars.ResultsThere was little difference between the average annual cost for urban and rural services with respective median costs of $85,919 versus $84,629. However remote service costs were higher ($120,172 - $124,492), driven by higher staff costs. The inclusion of capital costs did not add substantially to annual costs. Annual home haemodialysis costs ($42,927) were similar to other jurisdictions despite the significant differences in program delivery and payment of expenses not traditionally borne by governments. Annual peritoneal dialysis costs ($58,489) were both higher than home and in-centre haemodialysis by recent national dialysis cost studies.ConclusionThe cost drivers for staffed services were staffing models and patient attendance rates. Staff salaries and transport costs were significantly higher in remote models of care. Opportunities to reduce expenditure exist by encouraging community supported services and employing local staff. Despite the delivery challenges of home haemodialysis including high patient attrition, the program still provides a cost benefit compared to urban staffed services. The next component of this study will examine patient health service utilisation and costs by model of care to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the overall cost of providing services in each location.

Project description:BackgroundThe perception that healthy foods are more expensive than unhealthy foods has been reported widely to be a key barrier to healthy eating. However, assessment of the relative cost of healthy and unhealthy foods and diets is fraught methodologically. Standardised approaches to produce reliable data on the cost of total diets and different dietary patterns, rather than selected foods, are lacking globally to inform policy and practice.MethodsThis paper reports the first application, in randomly selected statistical areas stratified by socio-economic status in two Australian cities, of the Healthy Diets Australian Standardized Affordability and Pricing (ASAP) method protocols: diet pricing tools based on national nutrition survey data and dietary guidelines; store sampling and location; determination of household incomes; food price data collection; and analysis and reporting. The methods were developed by the International Network on Food and Obesity/NCD Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) as a prototype of an optimum approach to assess, compare and monitor the cost and affordability of diets across different geographical and socio-economic settings and times.ResultsUnder current tax policy in Australia, healthy diets would be 15-17% less expensive than current (unhealthy) diets in all locations assessed. Nevertheless, healthy diets are likely to be unaffordable for low income households, costing more than 30% of disposable income in both cities surveyed. Households spent around 58% of their food budget on unhealthy food and drinks. Food costs were on average 4% higher in Canberra than Sydney, and tended to be higher in high socioeconomic locations.ConclusionsHealth and fiscal policy actions to increase affordability of healthy diets for low income households are required urgently. Also, there is a need to counter perceptions that current, unhealthy diets must be less expensive than healthy diets. The Healthy Diets ASAP methods could be adapted to assess the cost and affordability of healthy and unhealthy diets elsewhere.

Dataset Information

Costing recommended (healthy) and current (unhealthy) diets in urban and inner regional areas of Australia using remote price collection methods.

Objective

Design

Setting

Participants

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Costing recommended (healthy) and current (unhealthy) diets in urban and inner regional areas of Australia using remote price collection methods.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets