Dataset Information

Transitioning from a noon conference to an academic half-day curriculum model: effect on medical knowledge acquisition and learning satisfaction.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The academic half-day (AHD) curriculum is an alternative to the traditional noon conference in graduate medical education, yet little is known regarding its effect on knowledge acquisition and resident satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association between the 2 approaches for delivering the curriculum and knowledge acquisition, as reflected by the Internal Medicine In-Training Examination (IM-ITE) scores and assessed resident learning satisfaction under both curricula. METHODS: The Cleveland Clinic Internal Medicine Residency Program transitioned from the noon conference to the AHD curriculum in 2011. Covariates for residents enrolled from 2004 to 2011 were age; sex; type of medical degree; United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1, 2 Clinical Knowledge; and IM-ITE-1 scores. We performed univariable and multivariable linear regressions to investigate the association between covariates and IM-ITE-2 and IM-ITE-3 scores. Residents also were surveyed about their learning satisfaction in both curricula. RESULTS: Of 364 residents, 112 (31%) and 252 (69%) were exposed to the AHD and the noon conference curriculum, respectively. In multivariable analyses, the AHD curriculum was associated with higher IM-ITE-3 (regression coefficient, 4.8; 95% confidence interval 2.9-6.6) scores, and residents in the AHD curriculum had greater learning satisfaction compared with the noon conference cohort (Likert, 3.4 versus 3.0; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The AHD curriculum was associated with improvement in resident medical knowledge acquisition and increased learner satisfaction.

SUBMITTER: Ha D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3963802 | biostudies-other | 2014 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Shared Molecules

Only show the datasets with similarity scores above: 0.5

Threshold

0.5

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe adoption of integrated curricula in medical schools has grown globally, emphasizing the need to understand academic medical staff satisfaction as a crucial factor influencing successful implementation.AimThis study aimed to assess satisfaction levels among academic medical staff with integrated medical curricula, identifying socio-demographic and work-related predictors of dissatisfaction.MethodsA cross-sectional, online multinational survey was conducted from December 2023 to April 2024 among 525 academic medical staff. A structured, self-reported questionnaire was used to assess satisfaction levels, demographic characteristics, and work-related factors. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including logistic regression analysis, to identify predictors of dissatisfaction.ResultsThe study revealed a low satisfaction rate (44.2%) among medical staff, with significant dissatisfaction influenced by nationality (Jordanian: OR = 7.74, and Egyptian: OR = 4.68), male gender (OR = 3.27), over ten years of teaching experience in integrated curricula (OR = 4.25), and employment in governmental universities (OR = 4.23). Dissatisfaction was particularly high with aspects such as the integration of basic and clinical sciences, assessment methods, and implementation schedules. Faculty from private universities demonstrated significantly higher satisfaction (65.1%) compared to those in governmental institutions (41.3%). Younger staff < 45 years reported higher satisfaction rates (50.9%) compared to their older counterparts ≥ 45 years (39.1%), reflecting greater adaptability to curriculum changes.ConclusionsThe findings highlight substantial dissatisfaction among academic medical staff with the design and implementation of integrated curricula, particularly in governmental institutions and among senior faculty. Institutions must address challenges in curriculum design, resource allocation, and faculty support to enhance satisfaction. Revisiting conventional curriculum components or adopting a hybrid approach may help balance innovation with faculty preferences, fostering a more conducive educational environment.

Project description:BackgroundMorbidity and Mortality (M&M) conferences are widely utilized clinical teaching forums across the USA. Recent literature demonstrates heterogeneity in the educational objectives of M&M, with prior authors suggesting a variety of overarching purposes of the conference, including teaching quality improvement methods; promotion of patient safety; enhancement of clinical knowledge and skills; and reflection on humanistic aspects of medical practice. There is less information in the published literature regarding learning outcomes of M&M participants.ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to describe learning outcomes from the Internal Medicine Morbidity, Mortality, and Improvement conference at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.DesignDirected content analysis of learning outcomes statements.ParticipantsInternal medicine physicians who requested Maintenance of Certification credit for one or more conference sessions during the 2017-2018 academic year.ApproachTwo independent reviewers analyzed 347 learning outcomes statements submitted by 49 conference participants. The reviewers used an iterative process to code content themes (the category of medical or healthcare delivery knowledge learned) and learning implementation domains (the context or manner in which learning would be applied), and to identify comments regarding the shared experience of practicing medicine.Key resultsSeventy-eight percent of comments described learning related to clinical knowledge and skills, and 28%, 34%, and 9% of comments described learning related to clinical reasoning skills, systems knowledge, and the need for systems change, respectively. Most conferences generated learning within a variety of themes and across multiple domains. Sixty-four percent of conferences included at least one reflection on the shared experience of practicing medicine.ConclusionsParticipants derived several types of learning from this Internal Medicine M&M conference. Although clinical knowledge and skills represent the most common type of learning, the conference also produces rich learning in other domains as well as reflections on the humility, challenges, and meaning of being a physician.

Project description:BackgroundThe academic half-day (AHD) has grown in popularity for medical education because it intends to provide learners with uninterrupted, immersive learning time that may promote participant attendance, engagement, and knowledge. Little is known about the extent of use, forms, or effectiveness of AHD in Post-graduate medical education. This scoping review summarizes existing literature and describes the learning outcomes, according to the Kirkpatrick model of learning evaluation, of AHD experiences on Post-graduate medical trainees.MethodsAuthors used Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework, searching electronic scientific literature databases from the years of 1977-2019 with relevant key terms and identifying 735 papers. Two independent raters completed title/abstract screening and then extracted pertinent data from papers meeting specified criteria.ResultsAuthors identified 38 relevant papers published in English, originating from programs in US (n = 19) and Canada (n = 19), spanning 4 disciplines: Medicine (n = 17, 45%), Pediatrics (n = 10, 26%), Critical Care/Surgery (n = 9, 24%), Radiology (n = 2, 5%). A majority (n = 33, 87%) described specific educational experiences; most focused on residents only (n = 27). The educational experiences included various teaching strategies; few were didactics only (n = 4) and most were multi-modal including simulation, case-based learning, problem-based learning, and/or self-directed online study. AHD size ranged from 5 to 364 participants (median 39). AHD length was 1.5-6 h (median 3). Required resources were inconsistently described. When evaluations of the specific educational experience were reported (n = 35 studies), the majority of studies used weak research designs (e.g., one group, pre/post-test, n = 19); few studies used strong research designs (e.g., randomized controlled trial, n = 2). Positive effects of AHD ranged across Kirkpatrick levels 1-3 learner outcomes.ConclusionsThe composition and content of AHD in Post-graduate medical education vary. Few studies of AHD use stringent research designs, and none include learner outcome measures at the highest Kirkpatrick level (i.e., level 4 results/patient outcomes). A consensus definition and further high-quality research on AHD in Post-graduate medical education is needed.