Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

RNA-sequencing with micro-dissected boundary organoid into anterior, posterior, and boundary regions

ABSTRACT: We report the continuous patterning and dynamic morphogenesis of hepatic, biliary and pancreatic structures, invaginating from a three-dimensional culture of human pluripotent stem cell (PSC). The boundary interactions between anterior and posterior gut spheroids differentiated from human PSCs enables autonomous emergence of hepato-biliary-pancreatic (HBP) organ domains specified at the foregut-midgut boundary organoids in the absence of extrinsic factor supply. The regional identity of the boundary region of anterior-posteior spheroids was analyzed by RNA-sequencing with micro-dissected boundary organoid into anterior, posterior, and boundary regions. Each region expressed the corresponding gut lineage markers. The early HBP specification markers including HHEX1 and PDX1 at the boundary were highly upregulated compared with the other two regions, indicating that the anterior-posterior boundary interactions autonomously generate HHEX and PDX1 positive cells in the absence of exogenous inductive factors. To delineate the HBP progenitor self-inductive mechanism, we evaluated the boundary specific expression profiles of known inductive signaling pathways that includes FGF, BMP, Hedgehog, NOTCH and retinoic acid (RA) signals, and found that the signal downstream of RA were activated prominently at the boundary region but not in the anterior or posterior regions.

ORGANISM(S): Homo sapiens

PROVIDER: GSE121830 | GEO | 2019/10/04

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

RNA-sequencing with micro-dissected boundary organoid into anterior, posterior, and boundary regions

Project description:RNA-sequencing with micro-dissected boundary organoid into anterior, posterior, and boundary regions

| PRJNA498598 | ENA

CTCF boundary remodels chromatin domain and drives aberrant HOX gene transcription in acute myeloid leukemia

Project description:We analyzed RNA-seq, ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq and 4C-seq data to find that CTCF binding site located between HOXA7 and HOXA9 genes (CBS7/9) is critical for establishing and maintaining aberrant HOXA9-HOXA13 gene expression in AML. Disruption of the CBS7/9 boundary resulted in spreading of repressive H3K27me3 into the posterior active HOXA chromatin domain that subsequently impaired enhancer/promoter chromatin accessibility and disrupted ectopic long-range interactions among the posterior HOXA genes. Consistent with the role of the CBS7/9 boundary in HOXA locus chromatin organization, attenuation of the CBS7/9 boundary function reduced posterior HOTTIP lincRNA and HOXA gene expression and altered myeloid specific transcriptome profiles important for pathogenesis of myeloid malignancies.

2018-05-17 | GSE113191 | GEO

A TAD boundary at the HoxD locus segregates opposing limb regulatory landscapes and their target genes [Hi-C]

Project description:The mammalian HoxD cluster is positioned at the boundary between two topologically associating domains (TADs), each of them matching a distinct, enhancer-rich regulatory landscape. During limb development, the telomeric TAD controls the early phase of Hoxd gene transcription in future forearm cells, whereas the centromeric TAD subsequently regulates transcription of more posterior Hoxd genes in presumptive digit cells. The TAD boundary is essential as it prevents the terminal Hoxd13 gene to respond to potent forearm enhancers, thereby allowing the formation of proper proximal limb structures. Here we apply chromosome conformation capture onto embryonic proximal and distal limb bud cells micro-dissected from a set of nested deletions involving part- or all- of this boundary region to try to understand the nature and function of this CTCF- and cohesin-rich DNA region. We document a progressive release of the boundary effect, allowing for inter-TAD contacts to be established, which were favoured by the functional status of the newly accessed enhancers. However, the boundary was highly resilient and only a 400kb large deletion including the whole gene cluster was eventually able to merge the two neighbouring TADs into a single structure. We propose that the whole HoxD cluster is a dynamic transcriptional boundary, showing slight variations depending on both the transcriptional status and the ontogenetic context

2017-12-22 | GSE101715 | GEO

A TAD boundary at the HoxD locus segregates opposing limb regulatory landscapes and their target genes [ChIP-Seq]

2017-12-22 | GSE101714 | GEO

A TAD boundary at the HoxD locus segregates opposing limb regulatory landscapes and their target genes [4C-Seq]

2017-12-22 | GSE101713 | GEO

Mass Spectrometry analysis of human matched Anterior and Posterior lobes of Pituitary

Project description:This study provides a comprehensive proteomic analysis of five matched pairs of the anterior and posterior lobe of the pituitary, which was used to study the proteomic signature specific to both anterior and posterior lobes. Anterior Lobe n=5 Posterior Lobe n=5 A441 PT441 A442 PT442 A457 PT457 A459 PT459 A460 PT460

2022-12-07 | PXD030235 | Pride

Chromosome Structure I: Loop extrusion or boundary:boundary pairing?

Project description:Two different models have been proposed to explain how the endpoints of chromatin looped domains (“TADs”) in eukaryotic chromosomes are determined. In the first, a cohesin complex extrudes a loop until it encounters a boundary element roadblock, generating a stem-loop (and an unanchored loop). In this model, boundaries are functionally autonomous: they have an intrinsic ability to halt the movement of incoming cohesin complexes that is independent of the properties of neighboring boundaries. In the second, loops are generated by boundary:boundary pairing. In this model, boundaries are functionally non-autonomous, and their ability to form a loop depends upon how well they match with their neighbors. Moreover, unlike the loop-extrusion model, pairing interactions can generate both stem-loops and circle-loops. We have used a combination of MicroC to analyze how TADs are organized and experimental manipulations of the even skipped TAD boundary, homie, to test the predictions of the “loop-extrusion” and the “boundary-pairing” models. Our findings are incompatible with the loop-extrusion model and instead suggest that the endpoints of TADs in flies are determined by a mechanism in which boundary elements physically pair with their partners, either head-to-head, or head-to-tail, with varying degrees of specificity. Although our experiments do not address how partners find each other, the mechanism is unlikely involve loop extrusion.

2024-04-04 | GSE263229 | GEO

Determinants of chromosome organization: Loop extrusion or boundary:boundary pairing?

Project description:Two different models have been proposed to explain how the endpoints of chromatin looped domains (“TADs”) in eukaryotic chromosomes are determined. In the first a cohesin complex extrudes a loop until it encounters a boundary element roadblock, generating a stem-loop (and an unanchored loop). In this model, boundaries are functionally autonomous: they have an intrinsic ability to halt the movement of incoming cohesin complexes that is independent of the properties of neighboring boundaries. In the second, loops are generated by boundary:boundary pairing. In this model, boundaries are functionally non-autonomous, and their ability to form a loop depends upon how well they match with their neighbors. Moreover, unlike the loop-extrusion model, pairing interactions can generate both stem-loops and circle-loops. We have used a combination of Micro-C to analyze how TADs are organized and experimental manipulations of the even-skipped TAD boundary, homie, to test the predictions of the “loop-extrusion” and the “boundary-pairing” models. Our findings are incompatible with the loop-extrusion model and instead suggest that endpoints of TADs in flies are determined by a mechanism in which boundary elements physically pair with their neighbors, either head-to-head, or head-to-tail.

2024-02-25 | GSE222999 | GEO

Analysis of M.xanthus boundary by nano-LC-MS/MS

Project description:Investigation of different proteins that play role in the formation of boundary between DK1622 and the incompatible mutant strain via proteomics approach.

2019-11-13 | PXD012532 | Pride

Vagotomy-dependent stomach gene expression

Project description:A vagotomy of the anterior region of the stomach of INS-GAS mice was performed at 6 month of age. The mice were sacrificed at 8, 10 and 12 months of age, The gene expression of the anterior and posterior regions of the stomach was compared at each time point.

2014-09-02 | GSE30295 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data