Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Cooperative Binding between distant Transcription Factors is a Hallmark of Active Enhancers

ABSTRACT: Enhancers harbor binding motifs that recruit transcription factors (TFs) for gene activation. While cooperative binding of TFs at enhancers is known to be critical for transcriptional activation of a handful of developmental enhancers, the extent TF cooperativity genome-wide is unknown. Here, we couple high-resolution nuclease footprinting with single-molecule methylation profiling to characterize TF cooperativity at active enhancers in the Drosophila genome. Enrichment of short MNase-protected DNA segments indicates that the majority of enhancers harbor two or more TF binding sites, and we uncover protected fragments that correspond to co-bound sites in thousands of enhancers. We integrate MNase-seq, methylation accessibility profiling, and CUT&RUN chromatin profiling as a comprehensive strategy to characterize co-binding of the Trithorax-like (TRL) DNA binding protein and multiple other TFs. We identify states where an enhancer is bound by no TF, by either single factor, by multiple factors, or where binding sites are occluded by nucleosomes. From the analysis of co-binding, we find that cooperativity dominates TF binding in vivo at a majority of active enhancers. Factor cooperativity occurs predominantly between sites spaced 50 bp apart in active enhancers, indicating that most TF cooperativity in cells occurs without apparent protein-protein interactions. Our findings suggest a mechanism for nucleosomes to promote cooperativity by requiring co-binding to effectively clear nucleosomes and promote enhancer function.

ORGANISM(S): Drosophila melanogaster

PROVIDER: GSE157664 | GEO | 2021/03/09

REPOSITORIES: GEO

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Zelda overcomes the high intrinsic nucleosome barrier at enhancers during Drosophila zygotic genome activation

Project description:A central question in biology is how enhancers are made accessible. The Drosophila embryo is a good model system to study this question as the gene regulatory networks regulating early developmental events have been well characterized. Zelda (Zld) is a uniformly distributed transcription factor (TF) integral to these networks, acting prior to and in collaboration with the patterning TFs to regulate target enhancers. Here we test the hypothesis that Zld directs TF binding, examplified by Dorsal (Dl) which patterns the dorsoventral axis, across the genome by displacing nucleosomes at enhancers. By performing ChIP-seq and MNase-seq experiments on early embryos with or without Zld, we demonstrated that early enhancers are characterized by an intrinsically high nucleosome barrier, which is overcome by Zld, and that without Zld, Dl binding decreases at enhancers and redistributes to open regions devoid of enhancer activity. We propose that enhancers are initially specified across the genome by the binding of Zld, which locally decreases nucleosome occupancy, thereby assisting TFs in accessing their binding motifs and promoting transcriptional activity. Zld, Dl, Pol II ChIP-seq and MNase-seq profiles comparing 2-3h wild-type (wt) and zld- embryos, and MNase-seq profiles comparing 2-4h wt and gd7 embryos, all in 2 replicates

2015-08-21 | E-GEOD-65441 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Zelda overcomes the high intrinsic nucleosome barrier at enhancers during Drosophila zygotic genome activation

2015-08-21 | GSE65441 | GEO

Genome-wide maps of NME2 in A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells.

Project description:It is widely believed that reorganization of nucleosomes result in availability of transcription factor (TF) binding sites for eukaryotic gene regulation. Recent findings also show TFs induced during physiological perturbations can alter nucleosome occupancy to facilitate DNA binding. Although, these suggest a close relationship between TF binding and nucleosomes, the nature of this interaction, or to what extent it influences transcription is not clear. Moreover, since physiological perturbations induced multiple TFs, relatively direct effect of any TF on nucleosome occupancy remains poorly addressed. With these in mind, we used a single TF to induce physiological changes and following characterization of the two states (before and after induction of the TF) we determined: (a) genome wide binding sites of the TF, (b) promoter nucleosome occupancy and (c) transcriptome profiles, independently in both conditions. We find only ~20% of TF binding results from nucleosome repositioning - interestingly, almost all corresponding genes were transcriptionally altered. Whereas, when TF-occupancy was independent of nucleosome repositioning only a small fraction of corresponding genes were expressed/repressed. These observations suggest a model where TF occupancy leads to transcriptional change only when coupled with nucleosome repositioning in close proximity. This, to our knowledge, for the first time also helps explain why genome wide TF occupancy (e.g., from ChIP-sequencing) typically overlaps with only a small fraction of genes that change expression. The nature of interaction between TF binding and nucleosomes and what extent it influences transcription

2014-08-04 | E-GEOD-40300 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Pioneer factor-nucleosome binding events during differentiation are motif-encoded

Project description:Though the in vitro structural and in vivo spatial characteristics of transcription factor (TF) binding are well defined, TF interactions with chromatin and other companion TFs during development are poorly understood. To analyze such interactions in vivo, we profiled several TFs across a time course of human embryonic stem cell differentiation via CUT&RUN epigenome profiling, and studied their interactions with nucleosomes and co-occurring TFs by Enhanced Chromatin Occupancy (EChO), a computational strategy for classifying TF binding characteristics across time and space. EChO shows that at different enhancer targets, the same TF can employ either direct DNA binding, or “pioneer” nucleosome binding to access them. Pioneer binding is correlated with local binding of other TFs and enhancer motif character, including degeneracy at key bases in the pioneer factor target motif. Our strategy reveals a dynamic exchange of TFs at enhancers across developmental time that is aided by pioneer nucleosome binding.

2019-06-25 | GSE128499 | GEO

Genome-wide profiling of nucleosome sensitivity and chromatin accessibility to MNase in D. melanogaster [RNA-seq]

Project description:Nucleosome structure and positioning play pivotal roles in gene regulation, DNA repair and other essential processes in eukaryotic cells. Nucleosomal DNA is thought to be uniformly inaccessible to DNA binding and processing factors, such as MNase. Here, we show, however, that nucleosome accessibility and sensitivity to MNase varies. Digestion of Drosophila chromatin with two distinct concentrations of MNase revealed two types of nucleosomes: sensitive and resistant. MNase-resistant nucleosome arrays are less accessible to low concentrations of MNase, whereas MNase-sensitive arrays are degraded by high concentrations. MNase-resistant nucleosomes assemble on sequences depleted of A/T and enriched in G/C containing dinucleotides. In contrast, MNase-sensitive nucleosomes form on A/T rich sequences represented by transcription start and termination sites, enhancers and DNase hypersensitive sites. Lowering of cell growth temperature to ~10°C stabilizes MNase-sensitive nucleosomes suggesting that variations in sensitivity to MNase are related to either thermal fluctuations in chromatin fiber or the activity of enzymatic machinery. In the vicinity of active genes and DNase hypersensitive sites nucleosomes are organized into synchronous, periodic arrays. These patterns are likely to be caused by “phasing” nucleosomes off a potential barrier formed by DNA-bound factors and we provide an extensive biophysical framework to explain this effect. RNA-seq S2 cells Drosophila melanogaster

2015-09-17 | E-GEOD-69335 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Two distinct promoter architectures centered on dynamic nucleosomes control ribosomal protein gene transcription

Project description:In yeast, ribosome production is controlled transcriptionally by tight coregulation of the 138 ribosomal protein genes (RPGs). RPG promoters display limited sequence homology, and the molecular basis for their coregulation remains largely unknown. Here we identify two prevalent RPG promoter types, both characterized by upstream binding of the general transcription factor (TF) Rap1 followed by the RPG-specific Fhl1/Ifh1 pair, with one type also binding the HMG-B protein Hmo1. We show that the regulatory properties of the two promoter types are remarkably similar, suggesting that they are determined to a large extent by Rap1 and the Fhl1/Ifh1 pair. Rapid depletion experiments allowed us to define a hierarchy of TF binding in which Rap1 acts as a pioneer factor required for binding of all other TFs. We also uncovered unexpected features underlying recruitment of Fhl1, whose forkhead DNA-binding domain is not required for binding at most promoters, and Hmo1, whose binding is supported by repeated motifs. Finally, we describe unusually micrococcal nuclease (MNase)-sensitive nucleosomes at all RPG promoters, located between the canonical +1 and M-bM-^@M-^S1 nucleosomes, which coincide with sites of Fhl1/Ifh1 and Hmo1 binding. We speculate that these M-bM-^@M-^XM-bM-^@M-^XfragileM-bM-^@M-^YM-bM-^@M-^Y nucleosomes play an important role in regulating RPG transcriptional output. Genome-wide examination of binding sites for transcription factors controlling ribosomal protein genes expression and nucleosome positions in budding yeast cells

2014-10-01 | E-GEOD-61596 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Genome-wide profiling of nucleosome sensitivity and chromatin accessibility in D. melanogaster [MNase]

2015-09-17 | E-GEOD-69177 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Co-regulation of transcription factor binding and nucleosome occupancy through DNA features of mammalian enhancers

Project description:In mammalian cells transcription factors (TFs) preferentially bind sites contained in regions of high nucleosomal occupancy, as determined by nucleotide-dependent computational analysis. This observation suggests that nucleosomes may act as gatekeepers of TF binding sites. We hypothesized that in mammalian genomes the information controlling nucleosome assembly may partially coincide with the information that enables TFs to recognize cognate sites in cis-regulatory elements while ignoring the myriad of non-functional, randomly occurring consensus binding sites. This way, nucleosome-mediated masking would be coupled to TF binding site functionality. The hematopoietic master regulator Pu.1 maintained nucleosome depletion at macrophage-specific enhancers that were otherwise occupied by nucleosomes in other cell types and in reconstituted chromatin. We identified a minimal set of DNA sequence and shape features that predicted Pu.1 binding with 78% accuracy. The same features predicted nucleosome occupancy in cells where Pu.1 was not expressed with higher accuracy than specifically designed models. Control of nucleosome deposition by DNA sequence and shape features that also specify TF consensus site functionality may allow maintaining the gatekeeper function of nucleosomes during evolution of cis-regulatory elements.

2014-05-08 | GSE50762 | GEO

TF binding profiles acquired using ChEC-seq in various TF co-deletion strains

Project description:This data set contains ChEC-seq binding profiles of various TF in yeast strains deleted of other TFs. Each sample has a pair-end sequencing file and a processed file (.out) is a genomic signal track after alignment to S.cerevisiae (R64) reference genome. Mapping was done using the read end. This dataset also contains raw and processed MNase-seq data files for nucleosome occupancy. Data related to manuscript: The architecture of binding cooperativity between densely bound transcription factors.

2023-08-01 | GSE222268 | GEO

High-throughput data and modeling reveal insights into the mechanisms of cooperative DNA-binding by transcription factor proteins (ETS1 and RUNX1)

Project description:Cooperative DNA-binding by transcription factor (TF) proteins is critical for gene expression regulation in eukaryotes. In the human genome, many regulatory regions contain TF binding sites in close proximity to each other, which can facilitate cooperative interactions. However, binding site proximity does not necessarily imply cooperative binding, as two TFs could also bind independently to each of their neighboring target sites. Currently, the rules that drive cooperative versus independent binding of TFs to neighboring sites are not well understood. In addition, it is oftentimes difficult to infer direct cooperativity between TFs from existing DNA-binding data. Here, we show that in vitro binding assays using DNA libraries of a few thousand genomic sequences with putative cooperative TF binding events can be used to develop accurate models of cooperativity and to gain insights into cooperative binding mechanisms. Using human factors ETS1 and RUNX1 as our case study, we show that the distance and orientation between ETS1 sites are critical determinants of cooperative ETS1-ETS1 binding, while cooperative ETS1- RUNX1 interactions show more flexibility in distance and orientation and can be accurately predicted based on binding affinity and the sequence/shape features of the binding sites. The approach described here, combining custom experimental design with machine learning modeling, can be easily applied to study the cooperative DNA-binding patterns of any TFs.

2023-07-30 | GSE171734 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data