Cultured OEC versus cultured SC and versus native OEC
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
ORGANISM(S): Rattus norvegicus
PROVIDER: GSE24801 | GEO | 2010/11/02
SECONDARY ACCESSION(S): PRJNA132293
REPOSITORIES: GEO
Similar Datasets
Project description:This microarray study aimed at identifying the differences in the global gene expression growth program of adult cultured olfactory ensheathing cells (cOEC) (from the olfactory bulb) versus adult cultured Schwann cells (SC) (from the sciatic nerve) and versus adult OEC directly dissected from the olfactory nerve layer (nOEC). The aim of the comparison between cOEC and SC is to define intrinsic molecular differences that distinguish cOEC from SC (both cell types support neuronal regeneration). The aim of the comparison between cOEC and nOEC is to determine the transcriptional responses that are induced in OEC during culturing. Three-condition experiment: cOEC vs. SC, cOEC vs. nOEC, SC vs. nOEC. Biological replicates: 3 cOEC-SC replicates, 3 cOEC-nOEC replicates, 3 SC-nOEC replicates. A factorial design was used consisting of direct comparisons between the three cell types (Glonek and Solomon, 2004 (PMID 14744830).
2010-11-02 | E-GEOD-24801 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) are neural crest-derived glia that ensheath bundles of olfactory axons from their peripheral origins in the olfactory epithelium to their central targets in the olfactory bulb. We took an unbiased laser microdissection and differential RNA-seq approach, validated by in situ hybridisation, to identify candidate molecular mechanisms underlying mouse OEC development and differences with the neural crest-derived Schwann cells developing on other peripheral nerves. We identified 25 novel markers for developing OECs in the olfactory mucosa and/or the olfactory nerve layer surrounding the olfactory bulb, of which 15 were OEC-specific, i.e., not expressed by Schwann cells. One pan-OEC-specific gene, Ptprz1, encodes a receptor-like tyrosine phosphatase that blocks oligodendrocyte differentiation. Mutant analysis suggests Ptprz1 may also act as a brake on OEC differentiation, and that its loss disrupts olfactory axon targeting. Overall, our results provide new insights into OEC development and the diversification of neural crest-derived glia.
2020-06-02 | GSE138596 | GEO
Project description:Olfactory ensheathing cells (OECs) are the only glial cells that support the olfactory sensory neurons which undergo adult neurogenesis and continually project their axons to glomeruli in the olfactory bulbs. We used single cell RNA sequencing to study the gene expression programs of OECs and to determine the diversity of purified OECs previously shown to promote spinal cord injury repair. Our analyses revealed five subtypes of OECs, each expressing unique marker genes and pathways indicative of progenitor, axonal regeneration, migration, or microglia-like functions. As expected, we found substantial overlap of OEC genes with those of Schwann cells, but also with astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and microglia. We experimentally confirmed the classic marker genes of the OEC subtypes and provide evidence that Reelin and Connective Tissue Growth Factors are secreted by multiple OEC subtypes. Our results support that adult OECs are a hybrid glia including some with progenitor characteristics and that they likely carry out diverse functions related to injury repair and axonal regeneration.
2022-10-13 | GSE215247 | GEO
Project description:Olfactory ensheathing cells are one of the few central nervous system regenerative cells discovered so far. It is characterized by its lifelong nerve regeneration function, and it can also release a variety of neurotrophic factors and neural adhesion molecules. It is considered to be the glial cell with the strongest myelination ability. Olfactory ensheathing cells and Schwann cells have phenotypes in common, they can promote axon regeneration(R. Doucette, 1995). Olfactory ensheathing cells have the characteristics of Schwann cells and astrocytes, but the overall performance tends to be the former, which has two unique characteristics. First, it exists not only in the peripheral nerves (Schwann cells), but also in the central nervous system (astroglia); second, the olfactory mucosa has the ability to regenerate life-long, including human olfactory ensheathing cells(J. C. Bartolomei and C. A. Greer, 2000). Regeneration is a process in which olfactory ensheathing cells participate in efficient regulation, although the specific mechanism is not yet clear. Olfactory ensheathing cells are different from astrocytes and Schwann cells, but at the same time have the characteristics of these two cells(S. C. Barnett, 2004), like Schwann cells help axon growth, but more than Schwann cells It can make axons grow long distances, that is, it has stronger migration(A. Ramon-Cueto et al., 1998); there are also astrocytes that have a nutritional effect on the survival of neurons and the growth of axons, but olfactory ensheathing cells can also wrap neurons forms myelin sheath to support the growth of nerve processes(R. Devon and R. Doucette, 1992; J. Gu et al., 2019). There are two characteristics that make olfactory ensheathing cells the best choice for the treatment of neurological diseases(S. C. Chiu et al., 2009; J. Kim et al., 2018; M. Abdel-Rahman et al., 2018). Olfactory ensheathing cells are gradually used to treat spinal cord injuries and have shown amazing effects(J. C. Bartolomei and C. A. Greer, 2000; K. J. Liu et al., 2010; R. Yao et al., 2018). Olfactory ensheathing cells that have been used in research are usually derived from the olfactory bulb(E. H. Franssen et al., 2007), but it is easier to obtain olfactory ensheathing cells from the olfactory mucosa in clinical practice(M. Ryszard et al., 2006), so the difference between the olfactory ensheathing cells from the olfactory bulb and the olfactory mucosa There are more and more studies(B. M. U. et al., 2007), and previous studies have shown that they not only have many similar functions, but also have many differences(M. W. Richter et al., 2005; L. Wang et al., 2014; K. E. Smith et al., 2020). Because olfactory ensheathing cells derived from the olfactory bulb are not easy to obtain, olfactory ensheathing cells derived from the olfactory mucosa have become the focus of attention. Although we know that olfactory ensheathing cells from two sources have nerve repair functions, it is not clear why the two different sources of olfactory ensheathing cells have different therapeutic effects. Nicolas G. once studied that the genetic difference between the two cells and found that there are many genes related to wound repair and nerve regeneration(G. Nicolas et al., 2010). We have reason to guess that olfactory ensheathing cells from these two sources will also have a large difference in protein level. Our research group wants to use the current mature transcriptome and proteomic sequencing technologies to explore the difference between olfactory ensheathing cells from the olfactory bulb and olfactory mucosa, and explain why the two sources of olfactory ensheathing cells shows different therapeutic effects, hope to provide a new theoretical basis for future clinical treatment.
2022-02-16 | PXD024046 | Pride
Project description:The aim of this study was to use global gene expression profiling to define intrinsic molecular differences that distinguish olfactory ensheathing cells from mucosa (OM-OECs) from olfactory ensheathing cells from olfactory bulb (OB-OECs). 10,000 OECs from olfactory mucosa (OM) or olfactory bulb (OB) were isolated from 4 rats.
2009-12-02 | GSE19250 | GEO
Project description:Comparison of three populations of OECs derived from the ONL of rats. The three populations were cultured employing the same culture medium but were maintained in vitro for a different amount of time (number of population doublings or PDs). OEC Ep cells were maintained for less than one week in vitro (less than 3 PDs); OEC Lp were maintained for over a year (more than 50 PDs) and TEG3 OEC cell line has been serially passed in culture for long-periods of time after genetic immortalization. Experiment Overall Design: RNA sample preparation and experimental design. Total RNA was isolated with TRIZOL (Invitrogen, Gibco-BRL) from primary OEC cultures (OEC Ep and Lp) and the OEC cell line (TEG3). Cultured cells were harvested at confluency with a rubber scrapper, resuspended in the TRIZOL reagent and processed following the manufacturersâ?? instructions. Two RNA pools were obtained from each OEC population (OEC Ep, OEC Lp and TEG3 cells). Each RNA pool was purified from three individual cultures (three 100mm dishes) and in the case of OEC Ep, each culture was derived from one rat. The total RNA was resuspended in DEPC (Sigma) water and stored at -70ºC prior to use. Total RNA concentration and purity were determined using Agilent2100 Bioanalizer. Experiment Overall Design: Microarray analysis. Total RNA pools were cleaned using Rneasy Kit from Qiagen. Biotinylated cRNA probes were generated from each RNA pool, fragmented, and applied to two different sets of Rat Genome Affymetrix GeneChip U34A Array. Affymetrix software (Microarray Suite version 5.0) was used to filter inaccurately represented probe sets.
2008-06-12 | E-GEOD-3258 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:To determine the GATA3 or HIF-1α regulated gene expression profile in OEC-M1 cells under hypoxia
2017-06-30 | GSE76581 | GEO
Project description:Cultured OEC versus cultured SC and versus native OEC
| PRJNA132293 | ENA
Project description:In order to improve our knowledge of olfactory ensheathing cells of the olfactory mucosa, we performed a wide microarray experiment to characterize the cell subpopulations found in primary olfactory mucosa cell cultures (CD90, P75 and TRKA cells). The consequences of the conditionning of TRKA cells by FBS deprivation and TGF-a supplementation was also studied.
2019-12-01 | GSE91017 | GEO
Project description:Gene expression profiles during the differentiation of EPCs into OECs were analyzed. Experiment Overall Design: RNA was isolated from Human cord blood derived- EPC and differentiated OEC from EPC. HG-U133A 2.0 microarray (54675 human genes; Affymetrix Santa Clara, CA, USA) was performed.
2008-10-26 | E-GEOD-12891 | biostudies-arrayexpress