Dataset Information

Resveratrol-induced changes of the human adipocyte secretion profile

ABSTRACT: PRIDE ID: 27081, PXD ID: PXD000012. Original data file: peptide11871.RAW. From PRIDE: {{i}} Enlarged white adipose tissue (WAT) is a feature of obesity and leads to changes in its paracrine and endocrine function. Dysfunction of WAT cells is associated with obesity associated disorders like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Resveratrol (RSV) a natural polyphenolic compound mimics beneficial effects of calorie restriction. As such, RSV seems a promising therapeutic target for obesity-associated disorders. The effect of RSV on the human adipokine profile is still elusive. Therefore, a proteomic study together with bioinformatical analysis was performed to investigate the effect of RSV on the secretion profile of mature human Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome (SGBS) adipocytes. RSV incubation resulted in elevated basal glycerol release and reduced intracellular TG content. This increased intracellular lipolysis was accompanied by profound changes in the adipocyte secretion profile. Extracellular matrix proteins were down-regulated while processing proteins were mostly up-regulated after RSV treatment. Interestingly, RSV induced secretion of proteins protective against cellular stress and proteins involved in the regulation of apoptosis. Furthermore, we found a RSV-induced up-regulation of adiponectin and ApoE accompanied by a down-regulation of PAI-1 and PEDF secretion which may improve anti-inflammatory processes and increased insulin sensitivity. These effects are beneficial to alleviate obesity-induced metabolic complications. In addition, two novel RSV-regulated adipocyte-secreted proteins were identified.{{/i}}

INSTRUMENT(S): Instrument

ORGANISM(S): Human, Human_adenovirus_54, Human_adenovirus_a, Human_adenovirus_b, Human_adenovirus_c, Human_adenovirus_d, Human_adenovirus_e, Human_adenovirus_f, Human_adenovirus_g, Human_astrovirus, Human_bocavirus, Human_bocavirus_2, Human_bocavirus_3, Human_bocavirus_4, Human_coronavirus_229e, Human_coronavirus_hku1, Human_coronavirus_nl63, Human_coronavirus_oc43, Human_cosavirus_a, Human_cosavirus_b, Human_cosavirus_d, Human_cosavirus_e, Human_enteric_coronavirus_4408, Human_enterovirus_100, Human_enterovirus_a, Human_enterovirus_b, Human_enterovirus_c, Human_enterovirus_d, Human_erythrovirus_v9, Human_herpesvirus_1, Human_herpesvirus_2, Human_herpesvirus_3, Human_herpesvirus_4_type_1, Human_herpesvirus_4_type_2, Human_herpesvirus_5, Human_herpesvirus_6a, Human_herpesvirus_6b, Human_herpesvirus_7, Human_herpesvirus_8_type_p, Human_immunodeficiency_virus_1, Human_immunodeficiency_virus_2, Human_metapneumovirus, Human_papillomavirus_fa75_ki88_03, Human_papillomavirus_rtrx7, Human_papillomavirus_type_10, Human_papillomavirus_type_100, Human_papillomavirus_type_101, Human_papillomavirus_type_103, Human_papillomavirus_type_104, Human_papillomavirus_type_105, Human_papillomavirus_type_108, Human_papillomavirus_type_109, Human_papillomavirus_type_112, Human_papillomavirus_type_113, Human_papillomavirus_type_16, Human_papillomavirus_type_24, Human_papillomavirus_type_26, Human_papillomavirus_type_32, Human_papillomavirus_type_34, Human_papillomavirus_type_4, Human_papillomavirus_type_41, Human_papillomavirus_type_48, Human_papillomavirus_type_49, Human_papillomavirus_type_5, Human_papillomavirus_type_50, Human_papillomavirus_type_53, Human_papillomavirus_type_60, Human_papillomavirus_type_63, Human_papillomavirus_type_6b, Human_papillomavirus_type_7, Human_papillomavirus_type_71, Human_papillomavirus_type_88, Human_papillomavirus_type_9, Human_papillomavirus_type_92, Human_papillomavirus_type_96, Human_papillomavirus_type_98, Human_papillomavirus_type_99, Human_papillomavirus___1, Human_papillomavirus___18, Human_papillomavirus___2, Human_papillomavirus___54, Human_papillomavirus___61, Human_papillomavirus___cand90, Human_parainfluenza_virus_1, Human_parainfluenza_virus_2, Human_parainfluenza_virus_3, Human_parechovirus, Human_parvovirus_4, Human_parvovirus_b19, Human_picobirnavirus, Human_respiratory_syncytial_virus, Human_rhinovirus_a, Human_rhinovirus_b, Human_rhinovirus_c, Human_tmev_like_cardiovirus, Human_t_lymphotropic_virus_1, Human_t_lymphotropic_virus_2, Human_t_lymphotropic_virus_4

DISEASE(S): Not Available

SUBMITTER: Rosenow A, et al.

PROVIDER: GPM11210004360 | GPMDB |

REPOSITORIES: GPMDB

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The effect of environmental salinity on the gill proteome was isolated in controlled mesocosm experiments. Salinity-dependent changes in the gill proteome were analyzed by LCMSMS data-independent acquisition (DIA) and Skyline. For this purpose, relative abundances of 1691 proteins representing the molecular phenotype of stickleback gills were quantified using previously developed MSMS spectral and assay libraries in combination with data-independent acquisition (DIA) quantitative proteomics (Li et al. 2018). Osmoregulatory responses were distinguished from general stress responses based on the direction of protein abundance changes. If the abundance of a protein was consistently regulated in opposite directions by hyper- versus hypo-osmotic salinity stress in all six mesocosm experiments then it was considered an osmoregulatory protein. If protein abundance was always increased in all six mesocosm experiments independent of whether salinity was increased or decreased then it was considered a stress response protein. KEGG pathway analysis revealed that the inositol phosphate metabolism, salivary secretion, several endocrine and extracellular signaling, valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation, citrate cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation pathways contain most osmoregulatory gill proteins whose abundance is directly proportional to environmental salinity. Most proteins that were inversely correlated with salinity map to pathways that represent proteostasis, immunity and intracellular signaling processes. General stress response proteins represent fatty and amino acid degradation, purine metabolism, focal adhesion, mRNA surveillance, phagosome, endocytosis, and several intracellular signaling pathways. Some proteins in these general stress response pathways are consistently down-regulated instead of being up-regulated during any type of salinity stress indicating that these KEGG pathways are not uniformly induced or repressed but that their function is being altered more intricately.

Project description:Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) and zipper-interacting protein kinase (ZIPK) have been implicated in diverse physiological functions, including smooth muscle contraction, cell proliferation, cell adhesion, apoptosis, cell migration and inflammation. Many aspects of regulation via ROCK and ZIPK, however, remain unclear. In this study, we utilized an siRNA approach to knock down ROCK1 and ZIPK in cultured human arterial smooth muscle cells. Microarray analysis was performed, using a whole-transcript expression chip, to identify changes in gene expression profiles induced by ROCK1 and ZIPK knockdown. ROCK1 knockdown affected the expression of 553 genes (355 down-regulated and 198 up-regulated), while ZIPK knockdown affected the expression of 390 genes (219 down-regulated and 171 up-regulated). A high incidence of up- and down-regulation of transcription regulator genes was observed in both ROCK1 and ZIPK knockdowns. Other markedly affected groups included transporters, kinases, peptidases, transmembrane and G protein-coupled receptors, growth factors, phosphatases and ion channels. Three microRNAs (mir-145, mir-199 and mir-622) were up-regulated by ROCK1 knockdown, whereas ZIPK knockdown had no effect on microRNA expression. 76 differentially expressed genes were common to ROCK1 and ZIPK knockdown, of which 41 were down-regulated and 26 up-regulated by both treatments, while the other 9 genes were differentially up/down-regulated. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis identified five pathways shared between the two knockdowns, which are mainly involved in cell cycle regulation. Marked differences in the effects of ROCK1 and ZIPK knockdown on the genes involved in cell cycle regulation suggested that ROCK1 and ZIPK regulate the cell cycle by different mechanisms. ROCK1, but not ZIPK knockdown significantly reduced the viability of vascular SMC. ROCK1 knockdown also affected several cytokine signaling pathways with up-regulation of 5 and down-regulation of 4 cytokine genes, in contrast to ZIPK knockdown, which affected the expression of only two cytokine genes (both down-regulated). IL-6 gene expression and secretion of IL-6 protein were up-regulated by ROCK1 knockdown, whereas ZIPK knockdown reduced IL-6 mRNA expression and IL-6 protein secretion and ROCK1 protein expression, suggesting that ROCK1 may inhibit IL-6 secretion. IL-1β mRNA and protein levels were increased in response to ROCK1 knockdown. Finally, ROCK1 but not ZIPK knockdown inhibited proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. We conclude that ROCK1 and ZIPK have diverse, but predominantly distinct regulatory functions in vascular smooth muscle cells.

Dataset Information

Resveratrol-induced changes of the human adipocyte secretion profile

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets