Benchmark1
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): TSQ Quantum Access, Q Exactive
ORGANISM(S): Standard
SUBMITTER: PDorrestein RKnight
PROVIDER: MSV000079814 | MassIVE | Tue Jun 14 13:16:00 BST 2016
REPOSITORIES: MassIVE
Similar Datasets
Project description:Quality control (QC) samples are commonly used in metabolomics approaches for three main reasons: (i) the initial conditioning of the column; (ii) the correction of analytical drift especially between batches; and (iii) the evaluation of measurement precision. In practice there are several ways to prepare and conserve QC samples. The most common in untargeted metabolomics is to pool samples after or before extraction, in order to obtain pooled QC samples accounting respectively for analytical variance or for both analytical and sample preparation variances. In this study, focusing on untargeted analysis of tea (Camellia sinensis) leaves, we compared three ways of preparing pooled QC samples (two usual and one unusual QC sample preparations) and their efficiency to improve data quality in terms of inter-batch correction, measurement precision, and VIP candidates selection on datasets obtained using two mass spectrometry (MS) technologies (Orbitrap and time of flight (QToF)). We also investigated the effect of data processing modalities, based on the different QC preparations, on data loss and on the global structure of the datasets. Generally, our results show that usual QC sample preparation leads to comparable datasets quality in terms of precision and dispersion in both MS instruments. They also show that QC preparation is crucial for VIP selection, in fact, up to 54% of biomarkers candidates are specific of the QC preparation type used for data processing.
2026-02-04 | MTBLS10568 | MetaboLights
Project description:Quality control (QC) in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is mainly based on data-dependent acquisition (DDA) analysis of standard samples. Here, we collected 2638 files acquired by data independent acquisition (DIA) and paired DDA files from mouse liver digests using 21 mass spectrometers across nine laboratories over 31 months. Our data showed that DIA-based LC-MS/MS related consensus QC metric is more sensitive than DDA-based QC in detecting MS status changes. We then optimized 15 DIA-QC metrics, and invited to manually assess the quality of 2638 DIA files generated by 21 mass spectrometers based on each metric. Based on the annotation results, we developed an AI model for DIA-based QC in the training set of 2059 DIA files, and predicted the liquid chromatography (LC) performance with an AUC of 0.91 and the MS performance with an AUC of 0.97 in an independent validation dataset (n = 523). Finally, we developed an offline software called iDIA-QC for convenient adoption of this methodology for LC-MS QC
2025-05-06 | PXD051878 | Pride
Project description:We isolated QC cells and obtained their cell-type specific transcriptional profiles in a WT and in a pan mutant background by sorting GFP+ cells marked with pWOX5::GFP.
2017-09-18 | GSE97792 | GEO
Project description:Quality control (QC) in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is mainly based on data-dependent acquisition (DDA) analysis of standard samples. Here, we collected 2638 files acquired by data independent acquisition (DIA) and paired DDA files from mouse liver digests using 21 mass spectrometers across nine laboratories over 31 months. Our data demonstrated that DIA-based LC-MS/MS-related consensus QC metric exhibit higher sensitivity compared to DDA-based QC metric in detecting changes in LC-MS status. We then optimized 15 metrics and invited 21 experts to manually assess the quality of 2638 DIA files based on those metrics. Based on the annotation results, we developed an AI model for DIA-based QC in the training set of 2110 DIA files. This model predicted the liquid chromatography (LC) performance with an AUC of 0.91 and the MS performance with an AUC of 0.97 in an independent validation dataset (n = 528). Finally, we developed an offline software called iDIA-QC for convenient adoption of this methodology for LC-MS QC.
2024-11-08 | PXD052871 | Pride
Project description:Quality control (QC) in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics is mainly based on data-dependent acquisition (DDA) analysis of standard samples. Here, we collected 2638 files acquired by data independent acquisition (DIA) and paired DDA files from mouse liver digests using 21 mass spectrometers across nine laboratories over 31 months. Our data demonstrated that DIA-based LC-MS/MS-related consensus QC metrics exhibit higher sensitivity compared to DDA-based QC metrics in detecting changes in LC-MS status. We then optimized 15 metrics and invited 21 experts to manually assess the quality of 2638 DIA files based on those metrics. Based on the annotation results, we developed an AI model for DIA-based QC in the training set of 2110 DIA files. This model predicted the liquid chromatography (LC) performance with an AUC of 0.91 and the MS performance with an AUC of 0.97 in an independent validation dataset (n = 528). Finally, we developed an offline software called iDIA-QC for convenient adoption of this methodology for LC-MS QC.
2025-05-07 | PXD055173 | Pride
Project description:We isolated QC and CEI cells and obtained their cell-type specific transcriptional profiles in a WT and in a wox5 mutant background by sorting GFP+ cells marked with pWOX5::GFP and pCYCD6::GFP.
2019-08-01 | GSE118102 | GEO
Project description:Data set contains 145 standards mixed together at equimolar concentrations in high background matrix of fecal extract.
2016-04-14 | MSV000079651 | GNPS
Project description:The PTM-SWATH MS Gold Standard data set consists of a previously published (Soste et al., 2014, PMID:25194849) set of 579 unpurified, synthetic, heavy-isotope labeled phosphopeptides (Thermo Scientific Biopolymers). These phosphopeptides represent biologically relevant sequences from S. cerevisiae proteins, which have been found altered in their phosphorylation status under various conditions. The complete peptide set contains a mixture of singly and doubly phosphorylated sequences with in average more than 3 modifiable residues per peptide (serines, threonines or tyrosins, often in close proximity to each other). All peptides were mixed with equal volumes (concentrations are unknown due to the unpurified status of the peptides) and the resulting peptide mix was either analyzed directly in DDA mode for assay library generation or spiked into a human cell line background proteome in a 13-step dilution series and analyzed in SWATH mode for the generation of the SWATH Gold Standard data set.
2017-06-12 | PXD004573 | Pride
Project description:Recently, we presented the DirectMS1 method of ultrafast proteome-wide analysis based on minute-long LC gradients and MS1-only mass spectra acquisition. Currently, the method provides the depth of human cell proteome coverage of 2500 proteins at 1% false discovery rate (FDR) when using 5-min LC gradients and 7.3 min runtime in total. While the standard MS/MS approaches provide 4000 to 5000 protein identifications within a couple of hours of instrumentation time, we advocate here that the higher number of identified proteins does not always translate into better quantitation quality of the proteome analysis. To further elaborate on this issue we performed one-by-one comparison of quantitation results obtained using DirectMS1 with three most popular MS/MS-based proteomic methods: label-free quantification (LFQ) and tandem mass tag (TMT) -based data dependent acquisition (DDA), and data independent acquisition (DIA). For the comparison we performed a series of proteome-wide analysis of well-characterized (ground truth) and real world biological samples, including a mix of UPS1 proteins spiked at different concentrations into E. coli digest used as a background and a set of glioblastoma cell lines. MS1-only data was analyzed using a novel quantitation workflow called DirectMS1Quant developed in this work. The results obtained in this study demonstrated comparable quantitation efficiency of 5 min DirectMS1 with both TMT and DIA methods utilizing 10 to 20-fold longer instrumentation time.
2023-08-25 | PXD033350 | Pride
Project description:Recently, we presented the DirectMS1 method of ultrafast proteome-wide analysis based on minute-long LC gradients and MS1-only mass spectra acquisition. Currently, the method provides the depth of human cell proteome coverage of 2500 proteins at 1% false discovery rate (FDR) when using 5-min LC gradients and 7.3 min runtime in total. While the standard MS/MS approaches provide 4000 to 5000 protein identifications within a couple of hours of instrumentation time, we advocate here that the higher number of identified proteins does not always translate into better quantitation quality of the proteome analysis. To further elaborate on this issue we performed one-by-one comparison of quantitation results obtained using DirectMS1 with three most popular MS/MS-based proteomic methods: label-free quantification (LFQ) and tandem mass tag (TMT) -based data dependent acquisition (DDA), and data independent acquisition (DIA). For the comparison we performed a series of proteome-wide analysis of well-characterized (ground truth) and real world biological samples, including a mix of UPS1 proteins spiked at different concentrations into E. coli digest used as a background and a set of glioblastoma cell lines. MS1-only data was analyzed using a novel quantitation workflow called DirectMS1Quant developed in this work. The results obtained in this study demonstrated comparable quantitation efficiency of 5 min DirectMS1 with both TMT and DIA methods utilizing 10 to 20-fold longer instrumentation time.
2023-08-25 | PXD033355 | Pride