QC mix; quality control mix of 6 compounds
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): impact II
ORGANISM(S): Just A Test
SUBMITTER: 
Chambers Hughes
PROVIDER: MSV000092586 | MassIVE | Thu Aug 03 08:44:00 BST 2023
REPOSITORIES: MassIVE
Similar Datasets
Project description:This is another test QC mix to learn about molecular networking.
2023-08-03 | MSV000092587 | MassIVE
Project description:This is a test, this is only a test, of a 6 mix. This is not useful data. Please don't publish.
2023-08-04 | MSV000092594 | MassIVE
Project description:This is another test of the quality control text mix. This is not really useful for anybody but me.
2023-08-04 | MSV000092593 | MassIVE
Project description:DIALib-QC (DIA library quality control) tool is used for the systematic evaluation of a spectral library’s characteristics, completeness and mass-accuracy ensuring correct identification and accurate quantitation of peptides and proteins from DIA/SWATH processing tools.
2020-10-16 | PXD020953 | Pride
Project description:Every laboratory performing mass spectrometry based proteomics strives to generate high quality data. Among the many factors that influence the outcome of any experiment in proteomics is performance of the LC-MS system, which should be monitored continuously. This process is termed quality control (QC). We present an easy to use, rapid tool, which produces a visual, HTML based report that includes the key parameters needed to monitor LC-MS system perfromance. The tool, named RawBeans, can generate a report for individual files, or for a set of samples from a whole experiment. We anticipate it will help proteomics users and experts evaluate raw data quality, independent of data processing. The tool is available here: https://bitbucket.org/incpm/prot-qc/downloads.
2021-03-11 | PXD022816 | Pride
Project description:Microarray technology provides a powerful tool for defining gene expression profiles of airway epithelium that lend insight into the pathogenesis of human airway disorders. The focus of this study was to establish rigorous quality control parameters to ensure that microarray assessment of the airway epithelium is not confounded by experimental artifact. Samples (total n=223) of trachea, large and small airway epithelium were collected by fiberoptic bronchoscopy of 144 individuals (42 healthy non-smokers, 49 healthy smokers, 11 symptomatic smokers, 22 smokers with lone emphysema with normal spirometry, and 20 smokers with COPD) were processed and hybridized to Affymetrix HG-U133 2.0 Plus microarrays. The pre- and post-chip quality control (QC) criteria established, included: (1) RNA quality, assessed by RNA Integrity Number (RIN) ≥7.0 using Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer software; (2) cRNA transcript integrity, assessed by signal intensity ratio of GAPDH 3' to 5' probe sets ≤3.0; and (3) the multi-chip normalization scaling factor ≤10.0 Of the 223 samples, 213 (95.5%) passed the QC criteria. In a data set of 34 arrays (10 samples failing QC criteria, 24 randomly chosen samples passing QC criteria), correlation coefficients for pairwise comparisons of expression levels for 100 housekeeping genes in which at least one array failed the QC criteria were significantly lower (average Pearson r = 0.90 ± 0.04) and more broadly dispersed than correlation coefficients for pairwise comparisons between any two arrays that passed the QC criteria (average Pearson r = 0.97 ± 0.01). By using the QC cutoff criteria, the inter-array variability, as assessed by the coefficient of variation in the expression levels for 100 housekeeping genes, was reduced from 35.7% to 21.7%. Based on the aberrant housekeeping gene data generated from samples failing the established QC criteria, we propose that the QC criteria outlined in this study can accurately distinguish high quality from low quality data and can be used to delete poor quality microarray samples before proceeding to higher-order biological analyses and interpretation.
2010-09-20 | GSE11906 | GEO
Project description:miRTrace is a tool for quality control and tracing taxonomic origins of microRNA sequencing data. It operates in two modes: Trace mode, in which the software reports the composition of clade-specific miRNAs; and QC mode, in which it performed an all-round quality control. To validate the QC mode of the software, we subjected the in-house control samples from HEK-293T cells to various treatments, such as cross-species contamiantion with Drosophila S2 RNAs, sample dilution and RNase A digestion. These samples were processed using QC mode of miRTrace. We demonstrate that miRTrace accurately identities poor-quality samples and to some extent even the causes of the compromised quality.
2018-10-31 | GSE118437 | GEO
Project description:Microarray technology provides a powerful tool for defining gene expression profiles of airway epithelium that lend insight into the pathogenesis of human airway disorders. The focus of this study was to establish rigorous quality control parameters to ensure that microarray assessment of the airway epithelium is not confounded by experimental artifact. Samples (total n=223) of trachea, large and small airway epithelium were collected by fiberoptic bronchoscopy of 144 individuals (42 healthy non-smokers, 49 healthy smokers, 11 symptomatic smokers, 22 smokers with lone emphysema with normal spirometry, and 20 smokers with COPD) were processed and hybridized to Affymetrix HG-U133 2.0 Plus microarrays. The pre- and post-chip quality control (QC) criteria established, included: (1) RNA quality, assessed by RNA Integrity Number (RIN) ≥7.0 using Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer software; (2) cRNA transcript integrity, assessed by signal intensity ratio of GAPDH 3' to 5' probe sets ≤3.0; and (3) the multi-chip normalization scaling factor ≤10.0 Of the 223 samples, 213 (95.5%) passed the QC criteria. In a data set of 34 arrays (10 samples failing QC criteria, 24 randomly chosen samples passing QC criteria), correlation coefficients for pairwise comparisons of expression levels for 100 housekeeping genes in which at least one array failed the QC criteria were significantly lower (average Pearson r = 0.90 ± 0.04) and more broadly dispersed than correlation coefficients for pairwise comparisons between any two arrays that passed the QC criteria (average Pearson r = 0.97 ± 0.01). By using the QC cutoff criteria, the inter-array variability, as assessed by the coefficient of variation in the expression levels for 100 housekeeping genes, was reduced from 35.7% to 21.7%. Based on the aberrant housekeeping gene data generated from samples failing the established QC criteria, we propose that the QC criteria outlined in this study can accurately distinguish high quality from low quality data and can be used to delete poor quality microarray samples before proceeding to higher-order biological analyses and interpretation. Affymetrix arrays were used to assess the quality of gene expression data in trachea, large airway and small airway epithelium obtained by fiberoptic bronchoscopy of 42 healthy non-smokers, 49 healthy smokers, 11 symptomatic smokers, 22 smokers with lone emphysema with normal spirometry, and 20 smokers with COPD.
2010-09-19 | E-GEOD-11906 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Glutaminyl cyclase (QC) activity in macrophage cells is correlated with the gene expression of MCP-2 and QC-catalyzed N-terminal pGlu formation of MCPs is required for macrophage migration and provide new insights into the role of QC in the inflammation process.
2021-10-22 | GSE21082 | GEO
Project description:Mitochondria sample replicate 1
2011-10-10 | PRD000373 | Pride