Dataset Information

French_Mushrooms_EtOAc_Extracts

ABSTRACT: Dataset of HPLC-HRMS/MS profiles from 146 species (191 samples, 48 families) of wild sporophore-forming fungi (macromycetes/mushrooms). Specimens were collected mostly in Alsace (France) between 2014 and 2025. 80 % of the dataset (153 samples) had species identification confirmed by ITS sequencing (Sanger method). The remaining 20 % were either not sequenced or yielded unsuccessful identifications due to PCR amplification failure; these samples were identified solely based on morphological and ecological characteristics. See the sample metadata for detailed information on collection sites and ITS validation status. EtOAc extracts profiled with HPLC-HRMS/MS on Bruker micrOTOF II. ESI Pos ionization mode. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Kinetex C18 column (Phenomenex), 2.6 microm, 150 x 2.1 mm. Mobile phase: (A) Water and (B) Acetonitrile both supplemented with 0.1% formic acid Gradient: Flow rate fixed at 0.7 mL/min. Initial conditions of 5% B for 0.5 min, followed by a linear gradient from 5% to 100% B over 19 min. Supplementary information includes sample metadata and an IIMN (Ion Identity Molecular Network) constructed from all detected features across aligned samples (blanks subtracted). The MZmine batch file, quantification table, and ion identity edge annotations used to build the molecular network are also provided.

INSTRUMENT(S): micrOTOF-Q II

ORGANISM(S): Tricholoma (ncbitaxon:40144) Fomitopsis (ncbitaxon:34474) Basidiomycota (ncbitaxon:5204) Ascomycota (ncbitaxon:4890) Hebeloma (ncbitaxon:34453) Xylaria (ncbitaxon:37991) Suillus (ncbitaxon:5379) Amanita (ncbitaxon:41955) Cortinarius (ncbitaxon:34451) Russula (ncbitaxon:5402) Hypholoma (ncbitaxon:71944) Agaricus (ncbitaxon:5340)

SUBMITTER: Theo Ozga Aurelie Urbain Jean-Michel Bellanger Valois Ludivine Yaouba Souaibou

PROVIDER: MSV000100977 | MassIVE | Thu Feb 26 01:36:00 GMT 2026

REPOSITORIES: MassIVE

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other

Items per page:

1 - 1 of 1

Similar Datasets

Project description:This data displays both known and unknown extra-cellular proteins from 13 species of Lactic Acid bacteria found in the honey-crop of the honeybee Apis. mellifera mellifera. The tryptic peptides from the secreted proteins were run on an Agilent HPLC on a C18 reverse phase column (75 µm x 150 mm, particle size 3 µm). Total run time was 90 min and flow rate 300 nl/min. Buffers used for gradient was 0.1% formic acid in water (buffer A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (buffer B). The buffer mixing was 5 min 5% buffer B, followed by 5%-45% buffer B in a linear gradient for 50 min, followed by 45%-80% buffer B in a linear gradient for 5 min. The 80% of buffer B was then kept for 15 min and then rapidly back to 5% buffer B for the final 15 min. The fractions from HPLC were loaded on an LCQ Deca XP Plus Ion trap mass spectrometer (ThermoScientific). Genomic DNA were prepared from all 13 LAB strains depicted earlier and sequenced at MWG Eurofins Operon (Ebensburg, Germany) using Roche GS FLX Titanium technology from Roche (Basel, Switzerland). For each genome a shotgun library was constructed with up to 700,000 reads per segment and was generated by sequencing in 2x half segment of a full FLX+ run. Each genome had an 8 kpb long-paired end library constructed. Approximately 300,000 true paired end reads, sequence tags, and scaffolds with GS FLX+ chemistry using 2x half segment of a full run were generated. Clonal amplification was performed by emPCR in both library types. The sequencing was continued until 15-20 fold coverage was reached. The obtained reads were assembled by the software Newbler 2.6 from Roche (Basel, Switzerland). ORF prediction and automated annotation was performed at Integrated Genomics Assets Inc. (Mount Prospect, Illinois, USA). In ORF prediction three different software were used, GLIMMER, Critica, and Prokpeg. Automated annotation was performed with the ERGOTM algorithms (Integrated Genomics Assets Inc. Mount Prospect, Illinois, USA). The resulting mass spectra-files obtained from the mass spectrometry analysis were searched using MASCOT against a local database containing the predicted proteome of the 13 LAB. We used a cut off Ions score of 38 as a value for determining that the protein was identified. Individual ion scores that were greater than 38 indicated identity or extensive homology (p<0.05) of the protein. Protein sequence similarity searches were performed with software BLASTP in the software package BLAST 2.27+ against a non-redundant protein database at NCBI. Pfam (default database), and InterProScan (default databases). Expressed proteins identified by peptide mass fingerprinting were manually re-annotated.

Project description:Ammonium hydroxide and pyrrolidine eluents were dried (SpeedVac) and reconstituted in 25 ul sample loading buffer (0.1% TFA/2% acetonitrile). Eluent from phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitation was dried and reconstituted in 35 ul of the loading buffer. An LTQ Orbitrap XL (ThermoFisher) in-line with a Paradigm MS2 HPLC (Michrom bioresources) was employed for acquiring high-resolution MS and MS/MS data. Ten microliters of the phospho-enriched peptides were loaded onto a sample trap (Captrap, Bruker-Michrom) in-line with a nano-capillary column (Picofrit, 75 um i.d.x 15 um tip, New Objective) packed in-house with 10 cm of MAGIC AQ C18 reverse phase material (Michrom Bioresource). Two different gradient programs, one each for MOAC and phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitation samples, were used for peptide elution. For MOAC samples, a gradient of 5-40% buffer B (95% acetonitrile/1% acetic acid) in 135 min and 5 min wash with 100% buffer B followed by 30 min of re-equilibration with buffer A (2% acetonitrile/1% acetic acid) was used. For phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitation samples, which were a much less complex mixture of peptides, 5-40% gradient with buffer B was achieved in 75 min followed by 5 min wash with buffer B and 30 min re-equilibration. Flow rate was ~0.3 ul/min. Peptides were directly introduced into the mass spectrometer using a nano-spray source. Orbitrap was set to collect 1 MS scan between 400-2000 m/z (resolution of 30,000 @ 400 m/z) in orbitrap followed by data dependent CID spectra on top 9 ions in LTQ (normalized collision energy ~35%). Dynamic exclusion was set to 2 MS/MS acquisitions followed by exclusion of the same precursor ion for 2 min. Maximum ion injection times were set to 300 ms for MS and 100 ms for MS/MS. Automatic Gain Control (AGC) was set to 1xe6 for MS and 5000 for MS/MS. Charge state screening was enabled to discard +1 and unassigned charge states. Technical duplicate data for each of the MOAC elutions (ammonium hydroxide and pyrrolidine) and triplicate data for the phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitation samples were acquired. RAW files were converted to mzXML using msconvert and searched against the Swissprot Human protein database (2013-Jan release) appended with common proteomics contaminants and reverse sequences as decoys. Searches were performed with X!Tandem (version 2010.10.01.1) using the k-score plugin. For all searches the following search parameters were used: Parent monoisotopic mass error of 50 ppm; fragment ion error of 0.8 Daltons; allowing for up to 2 missed tryptic cleavages. Variable modifications were oxidation of Methionine (+15.9949@M), carbamidomethylation of Cysteine (+57.0214@C), and phosphorylation of Serine, Threonine, and Tyrosine (+79.9663@[STY]). The search results were then post-processed using PeptideProphet and ProteinProphet.

Project description:Analysis of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples may give information of the identity of unattached (planktonic) subgingival bacteria, the 35 forefront candidates for systemic dispersal via ulcerated periodontal pocket epithelium. Our study represents the first one targeting the identity of bacteria in gingival crevicular fluid. Methodology/Principal findings: We determined bacterial species diversity in GCF samples of a group of periodontitis patients and delineated contributing bacterial and host-associated factors. Subgingival paper point (PP) samples from the same sites were taken for comparison. After DNA extraction, 16S rRNA genes were PCR amplified and DNA-DNA hybridization was performed using a microarray for over 300 bacterial species or groups. Altogether 133 species from 41 genera and 8 phyla 45 were detected with 9 to 62 and 18 to 64 species in GCF and PP samples, respectively, 46 per patient. Projection to latent structures by means of partial least squares (PLS) was applied to the multivariate data analysis. PLS regression analysis showed that species of genera including Campylobacter, Selenomonas, Porphyromonas, Catonella, Tannerella, Dialister, Peptostreptococcus, Streptococcus and Eubacterium had significant positive correlations and the number of teeth with low-grade attachment loss a significant negative correlation to species diversity in GCF samples. OPLS/O2PLS discriminant analysis revealed significant positive correlations to GCF sample group membership for species of genera Campylobacter, Leptotrichia, Prevotella, Dialister, Tannerella, Haemophilus, Fusobacterium, Eubacterium, and Actinomyces. Conclusions/Significance: Among a variety of detected species those traditionally classified as Gram-negative anaerobes growing in mature subgingival biofilms were the main predictors for species diversity in GCF samples as well as responsible for distinguishing GCF samples from PP samples. GCF bacteria may provide new prospects for studying dynamic properties of subgingival biofilms.

Dataset Information

French_Mushrooms_EtOAc_Extracts

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets