Project description:Meiotic crossover formation requires the stabilization of early recombination intermediates by a set of proteins and occurs within the environment of the chromosome axis, a structure important for the regulation of meiotic recombination events. The molecular mechanisms underlying and connecting crossover recombination and axis localization are elusive. Here, we identified the ZZS (Zip2–Zip4–Spo16) complex, required for crossover formation, which carries two distinct activities: one provided by Zip4, which acts as hub through physical interactions with components of the chromosome axis and the crossover machinery, and the other carried by Zip2 and Spo16, which preferentially bind branched DNA molecules in vitro. We found that Zip2 and Spo16 share structural similarities to the structure-specific XPF–ERCC1 nuclease, although it lacks endonuclease activity. The XPF domain of Zip2 is required for crossover formation, suggesting that, together with Spo16, it has a noncatalytic DNA recognition function. Our results suggest that the ZZS complex shepherds recombination intermediates toward crossovers as a dynamic structural module that connects recombination events to the chromosome axis. The identification of the ZZS complex improves our understanding of the various activities required for crossover implementation and is likely applicable to other organisms, including mammals.
Project description:Proteins of the XPF-ERCC1 complex family play roles in DNA repair. Known members (four in mammals, two in budding yeast) recognize branched DNA structures and most bear nuclease activity. Here, we identified a new XPF-ERCC1-like complex important for meiotic crossovers production. Through a proteomic screen, we found that Zip2 and Spo16, two proteins important for CO formation in budding yeast, form a complex and share structural similarities with XPF-ERCC1. Zip2 XPF domain is important for CO formation and, in complex with Spo16, preferentially binds branched DNA molecules. However, Zip2-Spo16 lacks endonucleolytic activity. This suggests that Zip2-Spo16 works as a structural module that recognizes and stabilizes joint molecules to ensure CO formation. Moreover, Zip2-Spo16 forms a complex (called ZZS) with Zip4, another protein important for CO formation, which directly interacts with components of the chromosome axis, providing a link between recombination intermediates and the underlying chromosome structure.
Project description:During meiosis, Structural Maintenance of Chromosome (SMC) complexes underpin two fundamental features of meiosis: homologous recombination and chromosome segregation. While meiotic functions of the cohesin and condensin complexes have been delineated, the role of the third SMC complex, Smc5/6, remains enigmatic. Diminished Smc5/6 function causes severe defects in nuclear division, but the underlying causes of these defects remain unclear. Here we identify specific, essential meiotic functions for the Smc5/6 complex in homologous recombination and regulation of cohesin. We show that Smc5/6 is enriched at centromeres and cohesin-association sites where it regulates sister-chromatid cohesion and the timely removal of cohesin from chromosomal arms, respectively. Smc5/6 also localizes to recombination hotspots, where it promotes normal formation and resolution of joint-molecule intermediates. Furthermore, we find that Smc5/6 specifically promotes resolution of joint molecules via the XPF-family endonuclease, Mus81-Mms4Eme1. We propose that Smc5/6 acts as a chaperone for M-bM-^@M-^XmitoticM-bM-^@M-^Y-like recombination processes during meiosis. ChIP-chip was used to compare Smc5 localization in wild-type and spo11 strains
Project description:During meiosis, Structural Maintenance of Chromosome (SMC) complexes underpin two fundamental features of meiosis: homologous recombination and chromosome segregation. While meiotic functions of the cohesin and condensin complexes have been delineated, the role of the third SMC complex, Smc5/6, remains enigmatic. Diminished Smc5/6 function causes severe defects in nuclear division, but the underlying causes of these defects remain unclear. Here we identify specific, essential meiotic functions for the Smc5/6 complex in homologous recombination and regulation of cohesin. We show that Smc5/6 is enriched at centromeres and cohesin-association sites where it regulates sister-chromatid cohesion and the timely removal of cohesin from chromosomal arms, respectively. Smc5/6 also localizes to recombination hotspots, where it promotes normal formation and resolution of joint-molecule intermediates. Furthermore, we find that Smc5/6 specifically promotes resolution of joint molecules via the XPF-family endonuclease, Mus81-Mms4Eme1. We propose that Smc5/6 acts as a chaperone for ‘mitotic’-like recombination processes during meiosis.
Project description:Interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are highly toxic DNA lesions, which are repaired via a complex process that requires the coordination of several DNA repair pathways. Defects in ICL repair result in Fanconi anemia (FA), which is diagnosed with bone marrow failure, development abnormalities and high incidence of malignancies. SLX4, which is also known as FANCP, acts as a scaffold protein in coordinating multi-endonucleases that function in unhooking ICLs, resolving homologous recombination intermediates, and perhaps also removing unhooked ICLs. To reveal the underlying mechanism for the involvement of SLX4IP in ICL repair, we tagged SFB to the C terminus of SLX4IP and performed tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometry analysis as outlined above. We found SLX4 and XPF-ERCC1 at the top of the list of SLX4IP-binding proteins. We also identified some other potential SLX4IP interacting proteins, such as PASK, AJUBA, LRP4 and TRIM26, but none of them has been previously indicated to participate in DNA repair. SLX4 and XPF-ERCC1 are the major SLX4IP-interacting proteins, with or without MMC treatment. SLX4 has been shown to coordinate with XPF-ERCC1 and participate in the unhooking of ICLs during the repair process. The binding of SLX4IP to both SLX4 and XPF-ERCC1 intrigued us to further investigate whether SLX4IP plays a role in regulating SLX4-XPF-ERCC1 interaction.
Project description:Programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) initiate meiotic recombination and their subsequent repair culminates in crossover (CO) formation. COs result from the asymmetric cleavage of double-Holliday junction (dHJ) intermediates, that requires the MutLγ endonuclease and a non-catalytic function of Exo1, an activity essential for fertility but at risk of generating unwanted chromosome rearrangements. Here we show how crossover formation by MutLγ is activated at the right time and at the right place. MutLγ forms a constitutive complex with Exo1, and in meiotic cells transiently contacts the upstream MutSγ (Msh4-Msh5) heterodimer. MutLγ associates with DSB hotspots only once recombination intermediates have been stabilized and engaged in the crossover repair pathway. MutLγ-Exo1 is recruited to DSB hotspots independently of the polo-like Cdc5 kinase, but to activate dHJ resolution, Cdc5 is recruited to the recombination intermediates and interacts individually with both MutLγ and Exo1, suggesting their direct modification. in vivo, MutLγ occupancy is restrained on recombination intermediates, and MutLγ associates with the vast majority of DSB hotspots, but at a lower frequency in centromeres, consistent with a strategy to reduce at-risk crossover events in these regions, and in late replicating regions. Our data highlight the tight temporal and spatial control of the activity of this constitutive, potentially harmful, nuclease.
Project description:Programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) initiate meiotic recombination and their subsequent repair culminates in crossover (CO) formation. COs result from the asymmetric cleavage of double-Holliday junction (dHJ) intermediates, that requires the MutLγ complex together with a non-catalytic function of Exo1, an activity essential for fertility but at risk of generating unwanted chromosome rearrangements. Here we show how crossover formation by MutLγ is activated at the right time and at the right place. MutLγ forms a constitutive complex with Exo1, and in meiotic cells transiently contacts the upstream MutSγ (Msh4-Msh5) heterodimer. MutLγ associates with DSB hotspots at a late step in the recombinational repair, once recombination intermediates have been stabilized and engaged in the crossover repair pathway. MutLγ-Exo1 is recruited to DSB hotspots independently of the polo-like Cdc5 kinase, but to activate dHJ resolution, Cdc5 is recruited to the recombination intermediates and interacts individually with both MutLγ and Exo1, suggesting their direct modification. in vivo, MutLγ occupancy is restrained on recombination intermediates, and genome-wide, MutLγ associates with the vast majority of DSB hotspots, but at a lower frequency in centromeres, consistent with a strategy to reduce at-risk crossover events in these regions, and in late replicating regions. Our data highlight the highly temporally and spatially control of the activity of this constitutive, potentially harmful, nuclease
Project description:Repairing broken chromosomes via joint molecule (JM) intermediates is hazardous and therefore strictly controlled in most organisms. Also in budding yeast meiosis, where production of enough crossovers via JMs is imperative, only a subset of DNA breaks are repaired via JMs, closely regulated by the ZMM pathway. The other breaks are repaired to non-crossovers avoiding JM formation requiring BLM/Sgs1 helicase. "Rogue" JMs that escaped the ZMM pathway and BLM/Sgs1 are eliminated before metaphase by resolvases like Mus81-Mms4 to prevent chromosome nondisjunction. 7 genome-wide meiotic ChIP-seq sets: 2 meiotic time points Smc6-myc DNA interaction (Smc6-ChIP), 2 meiotic time points Smc6-myc DNA interaction in the absence of induced recombination (Smc6-ChIP, spo11delta), 2 meiotic time points Sgs1-myc DNA interaction (Sgs1-ChIP), and 1 meiotic time point untagged as a negative control. (Corresponds to the main Figures 2 and 6, as well as to Figures S4, S7, in the associated publication.)
Project description:Meiotic recombination is initiated by programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and proceeds via binding of RPA, RAD51 and DMC1 to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) substrates created after the formation of DSBs. Here, we report high-resolution in vivo maps of RPA and RAD51 binding in meiosis, mapping their binding locations and lifespans in a B6 and a genetically modified B6xCAST F1 mouse. We ascribe signals separately to the individual homologous chromosomes in the hybrid mouse, thereby separating the signal of binding to the chromosome where DSBs occurred and the chromosome that was used as template for repair. Together with super-resolution microscopy and DMC1 binding maps, we show that DMC1 and RAD51 have distinct spatial localization on ssDNA: whereas DMC1 binds near the break-site, RAD51 binds away from it. We characterize the D-loop, a critical intermediate bound by RPA, in vivo. These data show that DMC1, not RAD51, performs strand exchange in mammalian meiosis. We find that the localisation of D-loop intermediates is similar in crossover and non-crossover pathways, with a longer lifespan for crossover-destined intermediates. These findings answer long-standing questions about the molecular intermediates of recombination.
Project description:The XPF-ERCC1 endonuclease is required for repair of helix-distorting DNA damage and interstrand crosslinks. Here we have engineered a severe mutation in Ercc1 gene (in which the last 7 amino acids are missing; named as "Ercc1-delta") leading to extreme sensitivity to DNA crosslinks and progeria.To investigate whether a disturbance in growth and metabolism could explain the pronounced accelerated organismal deterioration seen in Ercc1 delta mice, we evaluated the liver transcriptome of 16-week-old wt and mutant mice (n=6). At this age, the Ercc1-delta mice have not yet become cachectic.