Project description:Ma-Huang chicken as a high-quality broiler is one of the most popular chickens in the frozen chicken market. However, some chicken may instead have white or lighter skin, which directly causes economic losses every year. To obtain better insight into the molecular mechanisms associated with the process of pigmentation of yellow-skinned broilers reared under intensive conditions, a total of six-hundred Ma-Huang chickens was randomly selected in a single slaughterhouse, the color measurements were carried out on both cloaca(alive) and five different part after slaughtering adopting the L* a* b* system and using a 3nh-NH310 colorimeter, color values from areas of the chicken skin pear each image automatically retrieved by MATLAB, production and slaughtering traits were also measured, comparative transcriptomic analysis of high yellowness(s_deep) versus low yellowness(s_light) skin was performed using the Illumina Hiseq 4000. Average values of the cloaca(alive), cloaca (hair removal), thigh, shank and abdominal fat were 8.98, 7.66, 2.62, 7.29 and 12.86, respectively. The better production and slaughtering traits were observed in higher skin yellowness chicken. Yellowness values of the cloaca(alive) and after slaughtering were significantly correlated (p < 0.05), suggesting that the color of after slaughtering evaluation may be carried out on cloaca(alive). A total of 19061 unigenes were assembled from the reads obtained from the skin of two groups, 882 unigenes were differentially expressed between s_deep and s_light (Fold change ≥ 2, Adjusted P <= 0.001), 612 that up-regulated and 270 that down-regulated genes in s_deep skin, as compared with s_light skin. Twelve promising candidate genes may play an important role in the pigmentation of chicken skin, i.e. GPR143, PMEL, TYR, CYP11A1, TECRL, ACACB, TLR2B, ALDH1A3, FHL2, TECRL, DUOX2, SMOC1 were included. Furthermore, some important functional pathways were revealed, such as the biological process, cellular component and molecular function, which appear to be much activity in skin pigmentation. Our data provide a valuable resource for identifying genes whose functions are critical to skin pigmentation, facilitate understanding the molecular mechanisms of the skin color variation on yellow-skinned broiler chickens under commercial conditions, accelerate the molecular selection of the specific strain on consistent skin colors which allow reduction in pigment use to achieve the skin acceptance by the consumer.

Project description:Cultured skin substitutes, prepared using keratinocytes, fibroblasts and biopolymers, can facilitate closure of massive burn wounds by increasing the availability of autologous tissue for grafting. However, because they contain only two cell types, skin substitutes cannot replace all of the functions of native human skin. To better understand the physiological and molecular differences between cultured skin substitutes and native skin, we undertook a comprehensive analysis of gene expression in native skin, cultured keratinocytes, cultured fibroblasts, and skin substitutes using Affymetrix gene chip microarrays. Goals: Our analysis focused on identifying gene signatures that were highly characteristic of each cell and tissue type, and those that are regulated by the formation of cultured skin substitute from the individual components. Normalization: We used a normalization and referencing strategy that consisted of BioConductor/RMA Express RMA processing of the entire series of cel files followed by a per gene normalization in which the median value of expression for each gene was derived from the cultured samples only, and this was used as a reference for all samples including the cultured skin substitute. This approach allowed for the identification of genes that were higher and lower-expressed in the cultured skin relative to the individual cell types that were also expressed strongly or weakly in normal skin relative to the median value established by the three cell types. Results Summary:We identified six major clusters of coordinately regulated genes that were the most differentially expressed between groups. These clusters correspond to biomarker pools representing expression signatures for native skin, fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and cultured skin. The expression analysis revealed that entire clusters of genes were either up-regulated or down-regulated upon combination of fibroblasts and keratinocytes in cultured skin grafts. Further, several categories of genes were overexpressed in cultured skin substitutes compared with native skin, including genes associated with hyperproliferative skin or activated keratinocytes. The observed pattern of expression indicates that cultured skin substitutes in vitro, which display a well-differentiated epidermal layer, exhibit skin-like differentiation relative to gene expression patterns in the individual cells. This consists of both the activation of normal skin signature genes and the suppression of keratinocyte and fibroblast signatures. There is also a signature consistent with a hyperproliferative phenotype similar to wounded native skin. Keywords: Cell interaction and co-culture response expression profile

Project description:Cultured skin substitutes, prepared using keratinocytes, fibroblasts and biopolymers, can facilitate closure of massive burn wounds by increasing the availability of autologous tissue for grafting. However, because they contain only two cell types, skin substitutes cannot replace all of the functions of native human skin. To better understand the physiological and molecular differences between cultured skin substitutes and native skin, we undertook a comprehensive analysis of gene expression in native skin, cultured keratinocytes, cultured fibroblasts, and skin substitutes using Affymetrix gene chip microarrays. Goals: Our analysis focused on identifying gene signatures that were highly characteristic of each cell and tissue type, and those that are regulated by the formation of cultured skin substitute from the individual components. Normalization: We used a normalization and referencing strategy that consisted of BioConductor/RMA Express RMA processing of the entire series of cel files followed by a per gene normalization in which the median value of expression for each gene was derived from the cultured samples only, and this was used as a reference for all samples including the cultured skin substitute. This approach allowed for the identification of genes that were higher and lower-expressed in the cultured skin relative to the individual cell types that were also expressed strongly or weakly in normal skin relative to the median value established by the three cell types. Results Summary:We identified six major clusters of coordinately regulated genes that were the most differentially expressed between groups. These clusters correspond to biomarker pools representing expression signatures for native skin, fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and cultured skin. The expression analysis revealed that entire clusters of genes were either up-regulated or down-regulated upon combination of fibroblasts and keratinocytes in cultured skin grafts. Further, several categories of genes were overexpressed in cultured skin substitutes compared with native skin, including genes associated with hyperproliferative skin or activated keratinocytes. The observed pattern of expression indicates that cultured skin substitutes in vitro, which display a well-differentiated epidermal layer, exhibit skin-like differentiation relative to gene expression patterns in the individual cells. This consists of both the activation of normal skin signature genes and the suppression of keratinocyte and fibroblast signatures. There is also a signature consistent with a hyperproliferative phenotype similar to wounded native skin. Experiment Overall Design: The sample series consists of native human skin (NHS) samples isolated from female donors undergoing reduction mammoplasty (breast skin) or abdominoplasty (abdomen skin). Skin samples from donors that were used to establish cultures of fibroblasts (CF) and keratinocytes (CK) were assigned donor numbers in the order they were processed in the laboratory, for example: 633, 634, etc. An additional human skin sample (C-1-Ref) was used only to make RNA as a standard control, and was therefore not assigned a donor number. Cultured skin substitutes (CSS) were prepared using isogenic CF and CK from each donor, and were cultured for 2 weeks in vitro to permit development of a stratified and cornified epidermal layer (confirmed by histology). For microarray analysis, RNA was isolated from intact NHS, from CF and CK in monolayer cultures, and from CSS. Samples are labeled indicating the sample type and donor number; for example, CF633 represents cultured fibroblasts from donor 633. To control for variation between individuals, four donors (= biological replicates) were used for each sample type: NHS, CF, CK, and CSS. Efforts were made to have complete sets of 4 samples from each donor, but intact RNA was not obtainable from 2 of the NHS samples (donors 634 and 651); these were replaced with NHS RNA from similar donors (donors C-1-Ref and 636). To check the fidelity of the microarray analysis, 2 of the RNA samples (CK639 and CSS651) were analyzed in duplicate (= technical replicates)

Dataset Information

Gene expression in chicken skin cells cultured in vitro

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure