Mouse,GC-1,TMT（Tandem Mass Tag）tag quantification
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
INSTRUMENT(S): Q Exactive HF
ORGANISM(S): Mus Musculus (mouse)
TISSUE(S): Sperm, Cell Culture
SUBMITTER: 
Lingling Liu
LAB HEAD: Ling ling Liu
PROVIDER: PXD030967 | Pride | 2022-01-19
REPOSITORIES: Pride
Similar Datasets
Project description:Isobaric chemical tag labeling (e.g., iTRAQ and TMT) is a commonly used approach in quantitative proteomics research. Typically, peptides are covalently labeled with isobaric chemical tags, and quantification is enabled through detection of low-mass reporter ions generated after MS2 fragmentation. Recently, we have introduced and optimized a platform for intact protein-level TMT labeling that demonstrated >90% labeling efficiency in complex sample with top-down proteomics. Higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) is a commonly utilized fragmentation method for peptide-level isobaric chemical tag labeling because it produces accurate reporter ion intensities and avoids the loss of low mass ions. HCD energies have been optimized for peptide-level isobaric chemical tag labeling; however, fragmentation energies have not been systematically evaluated for TMT-labeled intact proteins for both protein identification and quantitation. In this study, we report a systematic evaluation of normalized HCD fragmentation energies on TMT-labeled HeLa lysate with top-down proteomics. Our results suggested that reporter ions often require higher collisional energy for higher ion intensities while most of intact proteins fragment when normalized HCD energies are between 30% and 50%. We further demonstrated that a stepped HCD fragmentation scheme with energies between 30 and 50% resulted in the optimized quantitation and identification for TMT-labeled intact HeLa protein lysate by providing average reporter ion intensity as > 3.60 E4 and average PrSM as > 1000 PrSM counts with high confidence.
2023-01-17 | PXD037491 | Pride
Project description:Isobaric stable isotope labeling using, for example, tandem mass tags (TMTs) is increasingly being applied for large-scale proteomic studies. Experiments focusing on proteoform analysis in drug time course or perturbation studies or in large patient cohorts greatly benefit from the reproducible quantification of single peptides across samples. However, such studies often require labeling of hundreds of micrograms of peptides such that the cost for labeling reagents represents a major contribution to the overall cost of an experiment. Here, we describe and evaluate a robust and cost-effective protocol for TMT labeling that reduces the quantity of required labeling reagent by a factor of eight and achieves complete labeling. Under- and over-labeling of peptides derived from complex digests of tissues and cell lines were systematically evaluated using peptide quantities of between 12.5 and 800�?g and TMT-to-peptide ratios (wt/wt) ranging from 8:1 to 1:2 at different TMT and peptide concentrations. When reaction volumes were reduced to maintain TMT and peptide concentrations of at least 10�mM and 2�g/L, respectively, TMT-to-peptide ratios as low as 1:1 (wt/wt) resulted in labeling efficiencies of >�99�% and excellent intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility. The utility of the optimized protocol was further demonstrated in a deep-scale proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of patient-derived xenograft tumor tissue benchmarked against the labeling procedure recommended by the TMT vendor. Finally, we discuss the impact of labeling reaction parameters for N-hydroxysuccinimide ester-based chemistry and provide guidance on adopting efficient labeling protocols for different peptide quantities.
2020-01-14 | PXD012703 | Pride
Project description:Although tandem mass tag (TMT)-based isobaric labeling has become a powerful technique for multiplexed protein quantitation, it has not been easy to automate the workflow for widespread adoption. This is because preparation of TMT labeled peptide samples involves multiple steps ranging from protein extraction, denaturation, reduction and alkylation to tryptic digestion, desalting, labeling with TMT reagents and cleanup, all of which require a high level of proficiency. The variability resulting from multiple processing steps is inherently problematic especially with large-scale studies such as clinical studies that involve hundreds of samples where reproducibility is critical for quantitation. Here, we sought to compare the performance of a recently introduced platform, AccelerOme, for automated proteomics workflows for TMT-labeling experiments with manual processing of samples. Cell pellets were prepared and subjected to a 16-plex experiment using the automated platform and a conventional manual protocol. Single shot LC-MS/MS analysis revealed a higher number of proteins and peptides identified using the automated platform. Efficiencies of tryptic digestion, alkylation and TMT labeling were similar both in manual and automated process. In addition, comparison of quantitation accuracy and precision showed similar performance in automated workflow compared to manual sample preparation. Overall, we demonstrated that the automated platform performs at a level similar to manual process in TMT-based proteomics. We expect that the automated workflow will increasingly replace manual work and be applied to large-scale TMT-baed studies providing robust results and high sample throughput.
2023-10-24 | PXD040788 | Pride
Project description:Stable isotope labeling of peptides is the basis for numerous mass spectrometry-based quantification strategies. Isobaric tagging and metabolic labeling, namely TMT and SILAC, are among the most widely used techniques for relative protein quantification. Here we report an alternative, precursor-based quantification method using non-isobaric TMT variants: TMT0 (TMTzero) and shTMT (super-heavy TMT). We term this strategy mTMT (mass difference tandem mass tagging), as these TMT variants differ by 11 mass units; yet, peptides labeled with these reagents co-elute, analogous to SILAC-labeled sample analysis. As proof-of-concept, we profiled the proteomes of two cell lines that are frequently used in neuroscience studies, SH-SY5Y and SVGp12, using mTMT and standard SILAC-labeling approaches. We show similar numbers of quantified proteins and peptides using each method with highly correlated fold changes between workflows. We conclude that mTMT is a suitable alternative for precursor-based protein quantification.
2019-09-16 | PXD014545 | Pride
Project description:Isobaric labeling has emerged as an indispensable quantitative proteomic approach for its unprecedented multiplexing capacity in a single analysis. Currently, different hyperplexing approaches have been developed to meet the need for increasing sample numbers in large-scale cohort analysis. In this report, we present a tribrid hyperplexing approach by the combinational use of three types of isobaric reagents, a novel isobaric tag 16-plex (IBT16) reagent, and the widely used TMT (TMT11) and TMTpro (TMT18) reagents. After the determination of the labeling efficiency and the optimization testing conditions, we systematically evaluated the identification and quantification performance of the three labeling methods in both independent and combinatorial means using the mixtures of E. coli and HeLa peptides with different ratios. Our results reveal that the three reagents are quite similar in all testing aspects although with some differences, and the combination use of three reagents to expand the multiplexing capacity is feasible. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for the choice of isobaric reagent combinations according to different plexes.
2023-03-17 | PXD037498 | Pride
Project description:A popular method for peptide quantification relies on isobaric labeling such as tandem mass tags (TMT) which enables multiplexed proteome analyses. Quantification is achieved by reporter ions generated by fragmentation in a tandem mass spectrometer. However, with higher degrees of multiplexing, the smaller mass differences between the reporter ions increase the mass resolving power requirements. This contrasts with faster peptide sequencing capabilities enabled by lowered mass resolution on Orbitrap instruments. It is therefore important to determine the mass resolution limits for highly multiplexed quantification when maximizing proteome depth. Here we defined the lower boundaries for resolving TMT reporter ions with 0.0063 Da mass differences using an ultra-high-field Orbitrap mass spectrometer. We found the optimal method depends on the relative ratio between closely spaced reporter ions and that 64 ms transient acquisition time provided sufficient resolving power for separating TMT reporter ions with absolute ratio changes up to 16-fold. Furthermore, a 32 ms transient processed with phase-constrained spectrum deconvolution provides >50% more identifications with >99% quantified, but with a slight loss in quantification precision and accuracy. These findings should guide decisions on what Orbitrap resolution settings to use in future proteomics experiments relying on isobaric TMT reporter ion quantification.
2018-10-05 | PXD011009 | Pride
Project description:By combining isobaric tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) technology, we constructed protein regulated profiles of deciduous molar germ at embryonic days 40 and 50 ,60 in miniature pig.
2018-05-23 | PXD006174 | Pride
Project description:We developed EASI-tag (Easily Abstractable Sulfoxide-based Isobaric tag), a new generation of amine-derivatizing and sulfoxide-containing isobaric labelling reagents, which dissociate at low collision energy and generate peptide-coupled, interference-free reporter ions with high yield. Efficient isolation of 12C precursors and quantification at the MS2 level enable accurate determination of quantitative differences between multiplexed samples. EASI-tag makes isobaric labeling applicable to any bottom up proteomics application and to benchtop mass spectrometers.
2018-06-21 | PXD007165 | Pride
Project description:In large-scale quantitative mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomics, isobaric labeling with tandem mass tags (TMTs) coupled with offline high-pH reversed-phase peptide chromatographic fractionation maximizes depth of coverage. To investigate to what extent limited sample amounts affects sensitivity and dynamic range of the analysis due to sample losses, we benchmarked TMT-based peptide fractionation strategies against single-shot (SS) label-free approach with data independent acquisition (DIA), for different peptide input per sample. To systematically examine how peptide input amounts influence TMT-fractionation approaches in a phosphoproteomics workflow, we compared two different high-pH reverse-phase fractionation strategies, microflow (MF) and stage-tip fractionation (STF), while scaling the peptide input amount down from 12.5 μg to 1 μg per sample. Our results indicate that, for input amounts higher than 5 μg per sample, TMT labeling, followed by microflow fractionation and phospho-enrichment (MF), achieves the deepest phosphoproteome coverage, even compared to SS DIA analysis. Conversely, stage-tip fractionation of enriched phosphopeptides (STF) is optimal for lower amounts, below 5 μg/peptide per sample. As a result, we provide a decision tree to help phosphoproteomics users to choose the best workflow as a function of on sample amount.
2022-06-28 | PXD031277 | Pride
Project description:Mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteome profiling is most commonly performed by label-free quantification (LFQ), stable isotopic labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC), and reporter-ion based isobaric labeling methods (TMT and iTRAQ). Isobaric peptide termini labeling (IPTL) was described as an alternative to these methods and is based on crosswise labeling of both peptide termini and MS2 quantification. High quantification accuracy was assumed for IPTL because multiple quantification points are obtained per identified MS2 spectrum. A direct comparison of IPTL with other quantification methods has not been performed yet because IPTL commonly requires digestion with endoproteinase Lys-C. To enable tryptic digestion of IPTL samples, a novel labeling for IPTL was developed which combines metabolic labeling (Arg-0/Lys-0 and Arg-d4/Lys-d4, respectively) with crosswise N-terminal dimethylation (d4 and d0, respectively). The comparison of IPTL with LFQ revealed significantly more protein identifications for LFQ above homology ion scores but not above identity ion score. However, the quantification accuracy was superior for LFQ despite the many quantification points obtained with IPTL. A reason for this outcome is probably because of the significantly higher signal intensities in MS1 compared to MS2.
2022-02-17 | PXD026942 | Pride