Dataset Information

An oncogene addiction phosphorylation signature and its derived scores inform tumor responsiveness to targeted therapies

ABSTRACT: Oncogene addiction provides important therapeutic opportunities for precision oncology treatment strategies. To date the cellular circuitries associated with driving oncoproteins, which eventually establish the phenotypic manifestation of oncogene addiction remain largely unexplored. We employed a targeted mass spectrometry approach to systematically explore alterations in 116 phosphosites related to oncogene signaling and its intersection with the DDR following inhibition of the addicting oncogene alone or in combination with irradiation in MET-, EGFR-, ALK- or BRAF (V600)-positive cancer models and ex vivo non-small cell lung cancer patient organotypic cultures. We identified an ‘oncogene addiction phosphorylation signature’ (OAPS) consisting of 8 protein phosphorylations (ACLY S455, IF4B S422, IF4G1 S1231, LIMA1 S490, MYCN S62, NCBP1 S22, P3C2A S259 and TERF2 S365) that are significantly suppressed upon targeted oncogene inhibition solely in addicted cell line models and patient tissues. We show that the OAPS is present in patient tissues and the OAPS-derived score strongly correlates with the ex vivo responses to targeted treatments.

INSTRUMENT(S): Q TRAP

ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (human)

TISSUE(S): Lung, Epithelial Cell, Cell Culture

DISEASE(S): Lung Cancer

SUBMITTER: Michaela Medova

LAB HEAD: Yitzhak Zimmer

PROVIDER: PXD037406 | Pride | 2023-03-11

REPOSITORIES: Pride

ACCESS DATA

Publications

An oncogene addiction phosphorylation signature and its derived scores inform tumor responsiveness to targeted therapies.

Orlando Eleonora E Medo Matúš M Bensimon Ariel A Quintin Aurélie A Riedo Rahel R Roth Selina M SM Riether Carsten C Marti Thomas M TM Aebersold Daniel M DM Medová Michaela M Aebersold Ruedi R Zimmer Yitzhak Y

Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS 20221210 1

<h4>Purpose</h4>Oncogene addiction provides important therapeutic opportunities for precision oncology treatment strategies. To date the cellular circuitries associated with driving oncoproteins, which eventually establish the phenotypic manifestation of oncogene addiction, remain largely unexplored. Data suggest the DNA damage response (DDR) as a central signaling network that intersects with pathways associated with deregulated addicting oncoproteins with kinase activity in cancer cells.<h4>Ex ...[more]

PMID: 36494469

Similar Datasets

Project description:We quantified the protein abundances of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Mpn), a genome-reduced organism, by combining selected reaction monitoring of a reduced set of labeled peptides and label-free shotgun mass spectrometry. A set of 77 labeled peptides were synthesized and used as internal standard peptides to precisely and quantitatively measure the absolute concentrations of proteins in a tandem mass spectrometer [1]. The heavy peptides were chosen based on tryptic peptides of endogenous proteins previously observed in mass spectrometry experiments and that covered more than a 1000-fold range of protein concentrations. Three time points of Mpn growth curve (48, 72 and 96 hours) and the heavy peptides were injected per triplicates in order to calculate the endogenous amount of each peptide (single reference point quantitation) [2], resulting in the absolute quantification of 73 reference proteins. A calibration curve between the absolute amount of reference proteins and the proteome-wide protein intensities allowed the estimation of absolute protein abundances for all detected proteins [3]. In order to further improve the quantification, four additional label-free mass spectrometry datasets of Mpn [4] using different protein extraction methods, from a previous project, were combined with the original dataset, which allowed to quantify the abundances of 528 proteins (75% of the proteome of Mpn). 1. Gerber SA, Rush J, Stemman O, Kirschner MW, Gygi SP. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 6940–6945. doi:10.1073/pnas.0832254100 2. Campbell J, Rezai T, Prakash A, Krastins B, Dayon L, Ward M, et al. Evaluation of absolute peptide quantitation strategies using selected reaction monitoring. Proteomics. 2011;11: 1148–1152. doi:10.1002/pmic.201000511 3. Schmidt A, Kochanowski K, Vedelaar S, Ahrné E, Volkmer B, Callipo L, et al. The quantitative and condition-dependent Escherichia coli proteome. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34: 104–110. doi:10.1038/nbt.3418 4. Miravet-Verde S, Ferrar T, Espadas-García G, Mazzolini R, Gharrab A, Sabido E, et al. Unraveling the hidden universe of small proteins in bacterial genomes. Mol Syst Biol. 2019;15: e8290. doi:10.15252/msb.20188290 5. Yus E, Maier T, Michalodimitrakis K, van Noort V, Yamada T, Chen W-H, et al. Impact of genome reduction on bacterial metabolism and its regulation. Science. 2009;326: 1263–1268. doi:10.1126/science.1177263 6. Wiśniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods. 2009;6: 359–362. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1322 7. Picotti P, Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Domon B, Aebersold R. Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics. Cell. 2009;138: 795–806. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.051 8. Martens L, Van Damme P, Van Damme J, Staes A, Timmerman E, Ghesquière B, et al. The human platelet proteome mapped by peptide-centric proteomics: a functional protein profile. Proteomics. 2005;5: 3193–3204. doi:10.1002/pmic.200401142 9. Desiere F, Deutsch EW, King NL, Nesvizhskii AI, Mallick P, Eng J, et al. The peptideatlas project. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34: D655–D658. Available: https://academic.oup.com/nar/article-abstract/34/suppl_1/D655/1132687 10. Lange V, Picotti P, Domon B, Aebersold R. Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial. Mol Syst Biol. 2008;4: 222. doi:10.1038/msb.2008.61 11. MacLean B, Tomazela DM, Shulman N, Chambers M, Finney GL, Frewen B, et al. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics. 2010;26: 966–968. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq054 12. Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis. 1999;20: 3551–3567. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2683(19991201)20:18<3551::AID-ELPS3551>3.0.CO;2-2 13. Elias JE, Gygi SP. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods. 2007;4: 207–214. doi:10.1038/nmeth1019

Project description:Phase 1: The whole saliva samples were obtained from 66 systemically healthy subjects consisting of patients with chronic periodontitis (CP), generalized aggressive periodontitis (G-AgP), gingivitis and individuals with periodontal health. The use of humans for study satisfied the requirements of the Ege University Institutional Review Board (Ethics number 16-12.1/16) and and was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. It is confirmed that this cross-sectional study conforms to STROBE guidelines for observational studies. Complete medical and dental histories were taken from all participants. Systemic exclusion criteria were the presence of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, diabetes mellitus, HIV infection, systemic inflammatory conditions or non-plaque-induced oral inflammatory conditions, immunosuppressive chemotherapy, and current pregnancy or lactation. Smoking status was also recorded. None of the patients had taken medication such as antibiotics or anti-inflammatory drugs that could affect their periodontal status for at least 6 months before the study. Patients eligible for the study returned to the clinic for clinical measurement screening one-week after being pre-screened. Before being enrolled in the study, participants provided written and informed consent to use their saliva samples and individual data for scientific purposes. The clinical periodontal indices including probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PI) and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded by a manual periodontal probe by a trained and calibrated examiner (V.O.O). The extent and severity of alveolar bone support were evaluated radiographically in each patient. The participants were classified into four groups based on their periodontal conditions according to the criteria proposed by the 1999 International Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions (REF). Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis (G-AgP): The G-AgP group included 17 patients with ≥16 teeth. The patients had a non- contributory medical history and demonstrated with an early age of clinical manifestations with a generalized pattern of rapid attachment loss and bone destruction. These individuals had minimum of CAL ≥ 5 mm and PD ≥ 6 mm on eight or more teeth; at least three of these were other than central incisors or first molars. Radiographic bone loss was above ≥ 30 % of root length affecting ≥3 permanent teeth other than first molars and incisors. Generalized Chronic Periodontitis (CP): The CP group included 17 patients with severe generalized chronic periodontitis. These individuals had a minimum four non-adjacent teeth with sites with CAL ≥ 5 mm and PPD ≥ 6 mm, and ≥50 % alveolar bone loss in at least two quadrants which was commensurate with the amount of plaque accumulation. Phase 2: We aimed to develop SRM-based workflow for detecting and quantitating the relative abundance of the candidate proteins in an independent saliva cohort . 82 subjects (48 females and 34 males; age range 24-59 years) were recruited for the study at the Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine, Ege University with the protocol number ((Ethics number 70198063-050.06.04). Each participant gave written and verbal informed consent after the purpose and procedures of the study were explained. A dental and medical history was compiled for all subjects as detailed in phase 1 and participants were clustered into four groups according to the criteria proposed by the 1999 International Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions as detailed at Phase 1

Project description:Hass2017-PanRTK model for single cell line The model structure comprises heterodimerization and receptor trafficking as described in detail in the article below. For ligand input, set a respective event. The illustrated event sets the EGF concentration to 2.5 nMol in the model file. This model is described in the article: Predicting ligand-dependent tumors from multi-dimensional signaling features. Hass H, Masson K, Wohlgemuth S, Paragas V, Allen JE, Sevecka M, Pace E, Timmer J, Stelling J, MacBeath G, Schoeberl B, Raue A. NPJ Syst Biol Appl 2017; 3: 27 Abstract: Targeted therapies have shown significant patient benefit in about 5-10% of solid tumors that are addicted to a single oncogene. Here, we explore the idea of ligand addiction as a driver of tumor growth. High ligand levels in tumors have been shown to be associated with impaired patient survival, but targeted therapies have not yet shown great benefit in unselected patient populations. Using an approach of applying Bagged Decision Trees (BDT) to high-dimensional signaling features derived from a computational model, we can predict ligand dependent proliferation across a set of 58 cell lines. This mechanistic, multi-pathway model that features receptor heterodimerization, was trained on seven cancer cell lines and can predict signaling across two independent cell lines by adjusting only the receptor expression levels for each cell line. Interestingly, for patient samples the predicted tumor growth response correlates with high growth factor expression in the tumor microenvironment, which argues for a co-evolution of both factors in vivo. This model is hosted on BioModels Database and identified by: MODEL1708210000. To cite BioModels Database, please use: Chelliah V et al. BioModels: ten-year anniversary. Nucl. Acids Res. 2015, 43(Database issue):D542-8. To the extent possible under law, all copyright and related or neighbouring rights to this encoded model have been dedicated to the public domain worldwide. Please refer to CC0 Public Domain Dedication for more information.

Dataset Information

An oncogene addiction phosphorylation signature and its derived scores inform tumor responsiveness to targeted therapies

Publications

An oncogene addiction phosphorylation signature and its derived scores inform tumor responsiveness to targeted therapies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure