Proteomics

Dataset Information

0

An evaluation of high-field asymmetric-waveform ion mobility spectrometry coupled to electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation for ADP-ribosylation proteomics


ABSTRACT: Objective: ADP-ribosylation is a post-translational modification that plays an important role in cellular processes. Our previous work implemented multiple gas-phase separation strategies (e.g., FAIMS) and in-source CID on the quadrupole-Orbitrap (Exploris 480) to increase the yield and acceptor site confidence scores of HCD-dependent ADP-ribosyl (ADPr) peptide identifications. We evaluated whether FAIMS coupled on the quadruple-ion trap-Orbitrap (Fusion Lumos) also improves EThcD-dependent ADP-ribosyl peptide sequencing. Methods: ADPr peptides derived from the human macrophage-like cell line THP-1 (THP-1-Mφ) were analyzed on the Lumos fronted with a FAIMS Pro and EASY-Spray Source, coupled to an Easy-nLC1200 HPLC pump. Gas-phase segmentation (GPS) for the MS1 scan range, and single and multiple combined compensation voltages (CVs) for FAIMS were applied for HCD and EThcD properties. ADP-ribosyl peptide spectra were analyzed using Proteome Discoverer 2.5. The ptmRS function was used for calculating ADP-ribosyl site probabilities. Results: We evaluated the number of ADPr and non-ADPr PSMs using ADPr peptides pooled from PBS and IFN-γ treated THP-1-Mφ across a range of CVs (-40V to -85V) using FAIMS with HCD and EThcD. The peak CVs for ADPr and non-ADPr PSMs were shifted for HCD, while they represented similar distributions for EThcD. The net number of unique ADPr and non-ADPr peptides across the CVs increased by 3.2- and 3.8-fold more respectively for HCD, and 2.0- and 3.6-fold respectively for EThcD, compared to no FAIMS. We then tested 4 distinct MS methods: (method 1: m/z 400-900, method 2: m/z 400-655 and m/z 650-900, method 3: three CVs combination (-50V, -60V, -70V) with m/z 400-900, method 4: three different acquisitions using distinct CVs (-50V, -60V, -70V) with m/z 400-900) for identifying the maximum number of ADPr acceptor sites with high (>95%) confidence using EThcD. Method 4 was best with 562 ADPr PSMs, but only 54% were high confidence ADPr sites. Due to sample volume limitation, we used method 3 for analyzing ADPr peptides enriched from THP-1-Mφ treated with PBS or IFN-γ separately. We identified 324 and 196 unique ADPr peptides from PBS and IFN-γ, of which 257 and 139 unique acceptor sites were identified with high confidence. The most frequent ADPr acceptor site was lysine (>90%), followed by serine. Conclusion: Our data demonstrated that while FAIMS is valuable for EThcD-dependent sequencing of ADPr peptides, the gains are less for ADPr peptides or contaminant non-ADPr peptides when using HCD.

INSTRUMENT(S):

ORGANISM(S): Homo Sapiens (human)

TISSUE(S): Cell Culture, Macrophage

SUBMITTER: Sasha Singh  

LAB HEAD: Masanori Aikawa

PROVIDER: PXD067389 | Pride | 2026-04-13

REPOSITORIES: Pride

altmetric image

Publications

Impact of Variations in Commercial Standard Operating Procedure on Plasma Proteome Recovery.

Kasai Taku T   Weiss Luisa L   Wohlfahrt Jessica J   Matamalas Joan T JT   Shlayen Gabriel G   Kirsch Zachary J ZJ   Aikawa Masanori M   Aikawa Elena E   Singh Sasha A SA  

Journal of proteome research 20260325 4


Advancements in mass spectrometry and complementary technologies now enable comprehensive, high-resolution plasma proteomics. Plasma is a key biofluid for clinical research, harboring potential disease-informative biomarkers. Commercial sources of nondiseased, healthy donor plasma samples are often used for proteomic workflow development and as controls for clinical studies. The overarching assumption is that standard operating procedures for plasma preparation are comparable across different so  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2025-12-26 | PXD068570 | Pride
2024-12-05 | PXD055586 | Pride
2020-01-27 | PXD011690 | Pride
2023-08-30 | PXD040898 | Pride
2021-11-02 | PXD027454 | Pride
2020-09-23 | PXD017417 | Pride
2016-12-22 | PXD005462 | Pride
2024-08-02 | PXD047613 | Pride
2025-11-25 | GSE310746 | GEO
2025-09-19 | PXD051108 | Pride