Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Influence of RNA extraction methods and library selection schemes on RNA-seq data

ABSTRACT: Influence of RNA extraction methods and library selection schemes on RNA-seq data

PROVIDER: PRJEB4197 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR304479_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR304479_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR304480_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR304480_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR304481_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 24

Similar Datasets

Influence of RNA extraction methods and library selection schemes on RNA-seq data.

Project description:BackgroundGene expression analysis by RNA sequencing is now widely used in a number of applications surveying the whole transcriptomes of cells and tissues. The recent introduction of ribosomal RNA depletion protocols, such as RiboZero, has extended the view of the polyadenylated transcriptome to the poly(A)- fraction of the RNA. However, substantial amounts of intronic transcriptional activity has been reported in RiboZero protocols, raising issues regarding their potential nuclear origin and the impact on the actual sequence depth in exonic regions.ResultsUsing HEK293 human cells as source material, we assessed here the impact of the two commonly used RNA extraction methods and of the library construction protocols (rRNA depletion versus mRNA) on 1) the relative abundance of intronic reads and 2) on the estimation of gene expression values. We benchmarked the rRNA depletion-based sequencing with a specific analysis of the cytoplasmic and nuclear transcriptome fractions, suggesting that the large majority of the intronic reads correspond to unprocessed nuclear transcripts rather than to independent transcriptional units. We show that Qiagen or TRIzol extraction methods retain differentially nuclear RNA species, and that consequently, rRNA depletion-based RNA sequencing protocols are particularly sensitive to the extraction methods.ConclusionsWe could show that the combination of Trizol-based RNA extraction with rRNA depletion sequencing protocols led to the largest fraction of intronic reads, after the sequencing of the nuclear transcriptome. We discuss here the impact of the various strategies on gene expression and alternative splicing estimation measures. Further, we propose guidelines and a double selection strategy for minimizing the expression biases, without loss of information.

| S-EPMC4148917 | biostudies-literature

DNA extraction methods comparison

Project description:The impact of the DNA extraction methods on the gut bacterial and fungal microbiota community recovery

| PRJEB29363 | ENA

A comparison of RNA extraction and sequencing protocols for detection of small RNAs in plasma

Project description:We compared 3 small RNA library prep kits (CleanTag, NEXTflex, QIAseq) and two RNA extraction methods (miRNeasy and MagnaZol) on plasma. We report that library preparation has a significant effect upon the miRNA profile detected, with QIAseq libraries exhibiting the least sequencing bias of the three library kits. RNA extraction methods also contribute, to a lesser extent, to the miRNA profile detected, with MagnaZol RNA extraction increasing the percentage of reads mapping to miRNAs and the number of individual miRNAs detected.

2019-05-21 | GSE118125 | GEO

Comparison of library preparation methods

Project description:Comparison of library preparation methods using Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii

| PRJEB7411 | ENA

Examination and comparison of the RNA extraction methods using mouse serum

Project description:Examination and comparison of the RNA extraction methods using mouse serum

| PRJNA1032931 | ENA

Effect of DNA extraction methods

Project description:Effect of DNA extraction methods on the determination of the structure of microbial communities in the phosphogypsum waste heap soil

| PRJEB12454 | ENA

The effects from DNA extraction methods on the evaluation of microbial diversity associated with human colonic tissue

Project description:Recent advances in (meta)genomic methods have provided new opportunities to examine host-microbe-environment interactions in the human gut. While opportunities exist to extract DNA from freshly sourced colonic tissue there are potentially valuable sources of DNA from historical studies that might also be examined. We examined how four different tissue DNA extraction methods employed in past clinical trials might impact the recovery of microbial DNA from a colonic tissue sample as assessed using a custom designed phylogenetic microarray for human gut bacteria and archaebacteria. While all methods of DNA extraction produced similar phylogenetic profiles some extraction specific biases were also observed. Real time PCR analysis targeting several bacterial groups substantiated this observation. These data suggest that while the efficacy of different DNA extraction methods differs somewhat all the methods tested produce an accurate representation of microbial diversity. This suggests that DNA samples archived in biobanks should be suitable for retrospective analyses.

2010-01-01 | GSE18420 | GEO

Sequencing Universal Human Reference RNA by Smart-seq and early barcoding library preparation methods

Project description:Many library preparation methods are available for gene expression quantification. Here, we sequenced and analysed Universal Human Reference RNA (UHRR) prepared using Smart-Seq2, TruSeq (public data) and a protocol using unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) that all include the ERCC spike-in mRNAs to investigate the effects of amplification bias on expression quantification. UHRR 10 and 12 replicates for Smart-seq2 and UMI-seq library preparation methods, respectively.

2016-05-13 | E-GEOD-75823 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Examination and comparison of the RNA extraction methods using mouse serum

Project description:Serum miRNAs are considered useful as non-invasive biomarkers for various diseases, but the optimal method for extracting RNA from serum is currently unknown. In this study, several RNA extraction kits were used to determine which kit is the optimal method. RNA was extracted from the serum of 8-week-old C57BL/6NJcl male mice according to the protocol of each RNA extraction kit. The yield of extracted RNA samples was calculated and electrophoretic patterns were evaluated by Agilent bioanalyzer. Expression patterns of the extracted RNA samples were confirmed by Agilent mouse miRNA microarray. The results showed significant differences in RNA yields in the miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit, and mirVana™ PARIS™ RNA and Native Protein Purification Kit compared to almost all other samples. Furthermore, two peaks were identified in the miRNeasy serum/plasma advanced kit using small RNA kit of Agilent bioanalyzer, one at 20-40 nucleotides (nt) and the other around 40-100 nt whereas the other reagents had a single peak. In addition, a high correlation was observed between the two RNA extraction kits in microarray. These results suggest that the above two kits are suitable for miRNA extraction from mouse serum.

2024-01-01 | GSE246437 | GEO

Comparison of methods to generate a pooled Enterococcus faecalis Tn library from arrayed library plates

Project description:Comparison of methods to generate a pooled Enterococcus faecalis Tn library from arrayed library plates

| PRJNA975209 | ENA