Dataset Information

Comparison of R10 and R9.4 Oxford Nanopore flowcells in bacterial genomics: raw read errors, and impact on assembly quality and gene annotation

ABSTRACT: Comparison of R10 and R9.4 Oxford Nanopore flowcells in bacterial genomics

PROVIDER: PRJEB51164 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
		Other
	ERR12342504.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR12342505.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR12342506.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR12342507.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 132

Similar Datasets

Project description:Highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses continue to pose global risks to One Health, including agriculture, public, and animal health. Rapid and accurate genomic surveillance is critical for monitoring viral mutations, tracing transmission, and guiding interventions in near real-time. Oxford Nanopore sequencing holds promise for real-time influenza genotyping, but data quality from R9 chemistry has limited its adoption due to challenges resolving low-complexity regions such as the biologically critical hemagglutinin cleavage site, a homopolymer of basic amino acids that distinguish highly pathogenic strains. In this study, human and avian influenza isolates (n = 45) from Cambodia were sequenced using both R9.4.1 and R10.4.1 flow cells and chemistries to evaluate performance between approaches. Overall, R10.4.1 yielded increased data output with higher average quality compared to R9.4.1, producing improved consensus sequences using a reference-based bioinformatics approach. R10.4.1 had significantly lower minor population insertion and deletion frequencies, driven by improved performance in low sequence complexity regions prone to insertion and deletion errors, such as homopolymers. Within the hemagglutinin cleavage site, R10.4.1 resolved the correct motif in 90% of genomes compared to only 60% with R9.4.1. Further examination showed reduced frameshift mutations in consensus sequences generated with R10.4.1 that could result in incorrectly classified virulence with automated pipelines. Improved consensus genome quality from nanopore sequencing approaches, especially across biologically important low-complexity regions, is critical to reduce subjective hand-curation and will improve local and global genomic surveillance responses.ImportanceThis study demonstrates significant advancement in the field of influenza virus genomic surveillance by showcasing the superior accuracy and data quality of the Oxford Nanopore R10 sequencing chemistry compared to the older R9 chemistry. Improved resolution, including in the critical hemagglutinin multi-basic cleavage site, enables more reliable monitoring and tracking of viral mutations. This accelerates the ability to respond quickly to outbreaks, potentially improving impacts on public health, agriculture, and the economy by enabling more accurate and timely interventions.

Dataset Information

Comparison of R10 and R9.4 Oxford Nanopore flowcells in bacterial genomics: raw read errors, and impact on assembly quality and gene annotation

Dataset's files

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets