Method Study
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERR412885_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR412885_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR412886_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR412886_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| ERR412887_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 22 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:High-throughput sequencing (HTS) of antibody amplicon libraries has become a powerful method in the emerging field of systems immunology. However, numerous sources of bias in HTS workflows may affect antibody repertoire data. A crucial step in antibody amplicon library preparation is the addition of adapter sequences, which are platform-specific short nucleotide sequences. In addition to conventional ligation-based adapter addition, it is also possible to use PCR-based methods such as Direct Addition (one-step adapter addition, DA) and Primer Extension (two-step adapter addition, PE), which have led to the lack of a consensus method and uncertainty regarding the impact of adapter addition on repertoire HTS data. Therefore, we compared all three methods by performing HTS with the Illumina MiSeq platform using total RNA originating from mouse antibody-secreting cells. We used technical replicate-based validation and clonal overlap and rank statistics to demonstrate that the two PCR-based methods produced HTS repertoires equivalent to ligation. Specifically: Nine BALB/c mice (8-10 weeks old, Charles River, specific-pathogen free) were immunized with 50 ug alum-precipitated chicken gamma globulin (CGG) conjugated to 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl (NP, NP-CGG, BioCat). Mice were sacrificed 14 days post-immunization (dpi) and their spleens and bone marrow (from femurs and tibia) were harvested. Antibody-secreting CD138-positive cells were enriched from spleen and bone marrow 14 dpi as previously described (Reddy, 2010, Nat Biotech).
2014-02-20 | E-MTAB-2226 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Copepod microbiome method comparison
| PRJNA698385 | ENA
Project description:DNA extraction method from alfalfa Metagenome
| PRJNA901244 | ENA
Project description:Transposon insertion site sequencing (TIS) is a powerful method for associating genotype to phenotype. However, all TIS methods described to date use short nucleotide sequence reads which cannot uniquely determine the locations of transposon insertions within repeating genomic sequences where the repeat units are longer than the sequence read length. To overcome this limitation, we have developed a TIS method using Oxford Nanopore sequencing technology that generates and uses long nucleotide sequence reads; we have called this method LoRTIS (Long Read Transposon Insertion-site Sequencing). This experiment data contains sequence files generated using Nanopore and Illumina platforms. Biotin1308.fastq.gz and Biotin2508.fastq.gz are fastq files generated from nanopore technology. Rep1-Tn.fastq.gz and Rep1-Tn.fastq.gz are fastq files generated using Illumina platform. In this study, we have compared the efficiency of two methods in identification of transposon insertion sites.
2022-05-30 | E-MTAB-11351 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Time series of eleven breast cancer samples subjected to different cold ischemic stress of up to 3 hr post tumor excision. A different 2x2 factorial within this study evaluated the effect of stabilization method (RNAlater vs snap freezing) and stablization delay (0 and 40 min) at room temperature.
2011-11-02 | GSE25011 | GEO
Project description:A method of stripping custom microarrays
| PRJNA108525 | ENA
Project description:DNA extraction method for synthetic Mars soil
| PRJEB68335 | ENA
Project description:Our genome wide analyses of microRNA expression profiles involve the hybridization of fluorescently labeled RNA samples to custom made, DNA microarrays based on the GAPSII coated slides. We describe a simple and effective method to regenerate such custom microarrays. Our protocol entails the use of a very low concentration of sodium hydroxide in a low salt buffer to strip RNA molecules from the arrays. The solution is also capable of removing DNA molecules hybridized to the slides, while preserving the slide coating and printed DNA probes. Slides can be stripped and reused at least twice without significantly sacrificing data quality. Keywords: expression study, new vs. stripped array comparison
2008-10-01 | GSE10305 | GEO
Project description:Aim: We aim to compare current (MeDIP-seq), new (Illumina Infinium 450K BeadChip) and future (PacBio) methods for whole genome DNA methylation analysis. As the interest in determination of disease methylation profiles increases, the scope, advantages and limitations of these methods requires assessment. There are key questions to answer and specific challenges to overcome. For example, how much detail/resolution is sufficient to identify regions of differential methylation and regions of biological/medical significance within a sample? How much coverage of the genome is required for accurate methylation analysis? Is it important to confirm which regions of the genome are unmethylated in addition to focusing on those that are methylated? Loss of methylation may be of equal importance within the cell since this may also contribute to disease pathogenesis. A multi-method (affinity enrichment/bisulphite-conversion based/direct sequencing of methyl-cytosine) and technology platform (Illumina HiSeq/PacBio/Illumina Infinium BeadChip) comparison will enable us to determine the strengths and weakness of each method. We propose to compare four methods using two DNA samples from the Coriell Institute for Cell Repository to assess both current and future capabilities for whole genome methylation analysis in parallel: A) MeDIP-seq using Illumina HiSeq B) Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450K BeadChip and C) whole genome methylation sequencing using PacBio. Existing single molecule deep bisulphite sequencing data generated previously from these same samples at the WTSI for targeted regions (30-40 genes) on the human X chromosome will be used to assess performance of each method. The methods selected for this study will generate data covering a range of resolutions from a whole genome scan to array (target defined) resolution and up to single base pair, single molecule resolution; the highest level of detail possible with methods currently available.Samples: DNA from sibling pair GM01240 (female) and GM01240 (male).Requirements: Both samples will be analysed using;A.MeDIP-seq using Illumina HiSeq (one HiSeq lane, 75bp paired end, per sample) B.Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation 450K BeadChipWe are expecting a potentially unnecessary high coverage using one HiSeq lane per sample. However, for the MeDIP procedure we do not have a multiplexing procedure in place. Our requirements for PacBio sequencing have been discussed with and will be supported by the Sequencing Technology Development group.
2013-01-22 | E-ERAD-139 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Bacillus velezensis isolate:Streak plate method Genome sequencing
| PRJNA865457 | ENA