Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

IdLapGibb

ABSTRACT: Laphria gibbosa, genomic and transcriptomic data

PROVIDER: PRJEB84342 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	ERR14172314_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR14172314_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	ERR14151140.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 3 of 3

Similar Datasets

iuPsoGibb

Project description:Psococerastis gibbosa, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB71620 | ENA

qqGibGibb

Project description:Gibbaranea gibbosa, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB73644 | ENA

eaAstGibb

Project description:Asterina gibbosa (Pennant, 1777) (cushion star), genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB78960 | ENA

E-GEOD-30573

Project description:Transcriptomic analysis of autistic brain reveals convergent molecular pathology [high-throughput sequence data]

2025-01-24 | E-GEOD-30573 | ExpressionAtlas

tfGorAlbo

Project description:Gordius_albopunctatus, genomic and transcriptomic data

| PRJEB78907 | ENA

Tropheryma whipplei proteome - Analyses of new genomic, transcriptomic or proteomic data commonly result in trashing many unidentified data escaping the ‘canonical’ DNA-RNA-protein scheme

Project description:Analyses of new genomic, transcriptomic or proteomic data commonly result in trashing many unidentified data escaping the ‘canonical’ DNA-RNA-protein scheme. Testing systematic exchanges of nucleotides over long stretches produces inversed RNA pieces (here named “swinger” RNA) differing from their template DNA. These may explain some trashed data. Here analyses of genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data of the pathogenic Tropheryma whipplei according to canonical genomic, transcriptomic and translational 'rules' resulted in trashing 58.9% of DNA, 37.7% RNA and about 85% of mass spectra (corresponding to peptides). In the trash, we found numerous DNA/RNA fragments compatible with “swinger” polymerization. Genomic sequences covered by «swinger» DNA and RNA are 3X more frequent than expected by chance and explained 12.4 and 20.8% of the rejected DNA and RNA sequences, respectively. As for peptides, several match with “swinger” RNAs, including some chimera, translated from both regular, and «swinger» transcripts, notably for ribosomal RNAs. Congruence of DNA, RNA and peptides resulting from the same swinging process suggest that systematic nucleotide exchanges increase coding potential, and may add to evolutionary diversification of bacterial populations.

2017-12-18 | PXD006238 | Pride

qqGibGibb

Project description:Gibbaranea gibbosa

| PRJEB73645 | ENA

Ancula gibbosa

Project description:Ancula gibbosa

| PRJNA970769 | ENA

iuPsoGibb

Project description:Psococerastis gibbosa

| PRJEB71621 | ENA

idLapGibb

Project description:Laphria gibbosa