Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

ABSTRACT: Enhanced bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soil by sophorolipids-modified biochar in combination with Iris lacteal Pall: metagenomic and metabolomic analyses

PROVIDER: PRJNA1166985 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR30834700_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR30834700_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR30834701_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR30834701_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR30834702_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 34

Similar Datasets

Whole transcriptome analysis of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Aca13 induced by n-hexadecane or naphthalene

Project description:Petroleum hydrocarbons are recalcitrant contaminants, which has caused most serious environmental problems. Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Aca13 was isolated from petroleum polluted soil for petroleum biodegradation. Hexadecane and naphthalene were used to incubate with Acinetobacter calcoaceticus Aca13. After incubation, the whole transcriptome was obtained from treated groups and control groups, and then used for RNA sequence and analysis. Obtained data in this project will help us understand the biodegradation mechanism of hexadecane and naphthalene, and will be helpful for the bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons.

2024-06-30 | GSE235642 | GEO

Project description:In-situ bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated sites

| PRJNA636951 | ENA

Microarray analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation: genomic DNA

Project description:High Arctic soils have low nutrient availability, low moisture content and very low temperatures and, as such, they pose a particular problem in terms of hydrocarbon bioremediation. An in-depth knowledge of the microbiology involved in this process is likely to be crucial to understand and optimize the factors most influencing bioremediation. Here, we compared two distinct large-scale field bioremediation experiments, located at Alert (ex situ approach) and Eureka (in situ approach), in the Canadian high Arctic. Bacterial community structure and function were assessed using microarrays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of bacteria found in cold environments and hydrocarbon degradation genes as well as reverse-transcriptase real-time PCR targeting key functional genes. Results indicated a large difference between sampling sites in terms of both soil microbiology and decontamination rates. A rapid reorganization of the bacterial community structure and functional potential as well as rapid increases in the expression of alkane monooxygenases and polyaromatic hydrocarbon ring-hydroxylating-dioxygenases were observed one month after the bioremediation treatment commenced in the Alert soils. In contrast, no clear changes in community structure were observed in Eureka soils, while key gene expression increased after a relatively long lag period (1 year). Such discrepancies are likely caused by differences in bioremediation treatments (i.e. ex situ vs. in situ), weathering of the hydrocarbons, indigenous microbial communities, and environmental factors such as soil humidity and temperature. In addition, this study demonstrates the value of molecular tools for the monitoring of polar bacteria and their associated functions during bioremediation. 38 soil samples from two high arctic locations that were contaminated-treated, contaminated or not contaminated followed for up to 4 years

2010-05-15 | E-GEOD-17517 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Microarray analysis of high Arctic soil bacterial response to hydrocarbon pollution and bioremediation: 16S rRNA

2010-06-19 | E-GEOD-17532 | biostudies-arrayexpress

Project description:Transcriptome sequencing of Iris dichotoma Pall.

| PRJNA690976 | ENA

Analysis of the physiological status of Geobacter uraniireducens growing in uranium-contaminated subsurface sediments

Project description:Geobacteraceae transfer electrons from a donor such as acetate to an electron acceptor such as Fe(III) or U(VI). Geobacter uraniireducens is found in uranium-contaminated sites and plays an important role in in situ bioremediation. In this experiment, gene expression was compared between G. uraniireducens cultures grown in sediments from a uranium contaminated site amended with acetate and cultures grown in acetate/fumarate medium. Keywords: two-condition comparison

2008-10-20 | GSE10920 | GEO

Project description:In-depth Exploration of the Coloration Mechanism of Iris dichotoma Pall. via Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analyses

| PRJNA1244055 | ENA

Project description:Quinone-Modified Biochar

| PRJNA1311537 | ENA

1ITS - Soil Microcosms Contaminated with Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Different Bioremediation Treatments Metagenome

Project description:ITS - Soil Microcosms Contaminated with Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Different Bioremediation Treatments Metagenome Metagenome

| PRJNA1206151 | ENA

16S rRNA - Soil Microcosms Contaminated with Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Different Bioremediation Treatments

Project description:16S rRNA - Soil Microcosms Contaminated with Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Different Bioremediation Treatments Metagenome

| PRJNA1205790 | ENA