Project description:Purpose: Soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines Ichinohe, (SCN) are the two most economically important pests of soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr., in the Midwest. Although the soybean aphid is an aboveground pest and SCN is a belowground pest there is evidence that concomitant infestations result in improved SCN reproduction. This study is aimed to characterize the three-way interactions among soybean, soybean aphid and SCN using demographic and genetic datasets. Results: More than 1.1 billion reads (61.4 GB) of transcriptomic data were yielded from 47 samples derived from the experiment using whole roots of G. max. The phred quality scores per base for all the samples were higher than 30. The GC content ranged from 43 to 45% and followed the normal distribution. After trimming, more than 99% of the reads were retained as the clean and good quality reads. Upon mapping these reads, we obtained high mapping rate ranging from 73.8% to 94.3%. Among the mapped reads, 67.1% to 87.6% reads were uniquely mapped. Conclusions: The comprehensive understanding of these transcriptome data would help in understanding the molecular interactions among soybean, A. glycines, and H. glycines. The use of multifaceted bioinformatics approaches could facilitate finding candidate genes and their function that might play a crucial role in various pathways for host resistance against both soybean aphids and SCN. For differential gene expression analysis, EdgeR, limma, and DEseq2 could be used. Apart from standalone tools like iDEP, Galaxy (https://usegalaxy.org), CyVerse (http://www.cyverse.org), and MeV (http://mev.tm4.org) could also be used for both analysis and visualization of RNA- seq data.
2019-05-18 | GSE125103 | GEO
Project description:Genome Resource for Coniothyrium glycines, causal agent of Soybean Red Leaf Blotch
Project description:Expression profiling of 7,530 Heterodera glycines probesets present on the Affymetrix Soybean Genome Array GeneChip throughout the life cycle of the nematode (egg, infective J2, parasitic J2, J3, J4, adult female).
Project description:Gene expression profiles in the bacterial pustule-resistant soybean cultivars To investigate the differential action between resistance and susceptible cultivars, we examined genome wide expression levels at five time points after X. axonopodis pv. Glycines (Xag) inoculation using microarray.
Project description:Many of the microorganisms that are normally present in the soil, actually inhabit the rhizosphere and interact with plants. Those plant–microorganisms interactions may be beneficial or harmful. Among the first are the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). These soil fungi have been reported to improve plant resistance/tolerance to pests and diseases. On the other hand, soilborne pathogens represent a threat to agriculture generating important yield losses, depending upon the pathogen and the crop. One example is the “Sudden Death Syndrome” (SDS), a severe disease in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr) caused by a complex of at least four species of Fusarium sp., among which Fusarium virguliforme and F. tuccumaniae are the most prevalent in Argentina. This study provides, under strict in vitro culture conditions, a global analysis of transcript modifications in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal soybean root associated with F. virguliforme inoculation. Microarray results showed qualitative and quantitative changes in the expression of defense-related genes in mycorrhizal soybean, suggesting that AMF are good candidates for sustainable plant protection against F. virguliforme.
Project description:Gene expression profiles in resistant (cv. Dowling) and susceptible (Williams 82) soybean genotypes [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] were compared at 6 and 12 h with and without aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura) infestation using cDNA microarrays consisting of approximately 18,000 soybean-expressed sequence tags. More genes were induced in Dowling than Williams 82 at 6 h after infestation. Genes that were differentially expressed between aphid and control treatments were selected as aphid-response genes. Eighty-four genes showed specific responses in Dowling and included genes related to defense and other processes. Expression of three defense-related genes was examined at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after infestation in both genotypes by quantitative real-time PCR. The increases in the transcripts of three defense-related genes were earlier and stronger at 6, 12 and 24 h after infestation in Dowling compared to Williams 82. The differential gene expression between the two genotypes without aphids was determined, and five genes with constitutively higher expression levels were found in Dowling. Keywords = genomic Keywords = Defense Responses Keywords = plant Keywords = DNA-binding protein Keywords = PR proteins Keywords = plant resistance Keywords = signal transduction keywords = insect Keywords: susceptible vs resistant
Project description:Background: Soybean cyst nematode (SCN, Heterodera glycines Ichinohe) is the most devastating pathogen of soybean. Many gene expression profiling studies have been conducted to investigate the responses of soybean to the infection by this pathogen using primarily the first-generation soybean genome array that covered approximately 37,500 soybean transcripts. However, no study has been reported yet using the second-generation Affymetrix soybean whole-genome transcript array (Soybean WT array) that represents approximately 66,000 predicted soybean transcripts. Results: In the present work, the gene expression profiles of two soybean plant introductions (PIs) PI 437654 and PI 567516C (both resistant to multiple SCN races) and cultivar (cv.) Magellan (susceptible to SCN) were compared in the presence or absence of the SCN inoculum at different time points (3 and 8 days post-inoculation). For this purpose, the Soybean WT array, which covers many more predicted soybean transcripts than the first-generation Affymetrix soybean array, was employed. Data analysis revealed that the two resistant soybean lines showed distinctive gene expression profiles from each other and from Magellan not only in response to the SCN inoculation, but also in the absence of SCN. Overall, 1,413 genes and many pathways, such as defense and hormonal pathways, were revealed to be differentially regulated. Among them, 297 genes were constitutively regulated in the two resistant lines (compared with cv. Magellan) and 1,146 genes were responsive to the SCN inoculation in the three lines, with 30 genes regulated both constitutively and by SCN. In addition to the findings similar to those in the published work, many genes involved in ethylene, protein degradation, and phenylpropanoid pathways were also revealed differentially regulated in the present study. GC-rich elements (e.g., GCATGC) were found over-represented in the promoter regions of certain groups of genes. These have not been observed before, and could be new defense-responsive regulatory elements. Conclusions: Different soybean lines showed different gene expression profiles in the presence and absence of the SCN inoculum. Both inducible and constitutive gene expression may contribute to resistance to multiple SCN HG Types in the resistant soybean PI lines. Ethylene, protein degradation, and phenylpropanoid pathways, as well as many other pathways reported previously, may play important roles in mediating the soybean-SCN interactions. The revealed genes, pathways, and promoter elements can be further explored to regulate or engineer soybean for resistance to SCN.