Project description:Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is the most important fiber crop, and its lint yield improvement is impeded due to its narrow genetic base and the lack of understanding of the genetic basis of yield. Backcross inbred lines (BILs) or near-isogenic lines (NILs) in the same genetic background differing in lint yield, developed through advanced backcrossing, provide an important genomic resource to study the molecular genetic basis of lint yield. We used a microarray-based comparative transcriptome analysis on developing fibers at 10 days post-anthesis (DPA) between a high-yield (HY) group and a low-yield (LY) group each with three BILs were selected from a BIL population between G. hirsutum and G. barbadense, and identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) during this process.
Project description:A method was developed to isolate RNA from 1 dpa fiber. ESTs derived from this and other cotton mRNAs were sequenced and assembled into contigs. Contigs composed of EST unique to libraries of interest and unique singletons were represented on a microarray. Microarrays were hybridized with labed nucleic acids derived from 10 dpa fiber and 1 dpa fiber to identify genes differentially regulated during fiber initiation and fiber elongation. Genes with known expression in fiber were included to validate the microarray. Analysis of the gene ontology (GO) of differentially expressed genes suported previously reported aspects of fiber initiation such as cell wall remodeling. Transcription factors upregulated in fiber initials and elongating fiber were identified Keywords: cell type comparison
Project description:RNAs from the upland cotton 9-DPA fibers were compared to the 9-DPA fiber-detached ovule. RNAs from the upland cotton 9-DPA fibers were compared to the 9-DPA fiber-detached ovule.
Project description:To explore the regulation mechanism of GhWRKY16 in fiber development, we performed a transcriptome deep sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis on 9 DPA fibers from wild type and GhWRKY16-RNAi seeds. We identified 2,186 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), consisting of 1,088 upregulated genes and 1,098 downregulated genes Gene ontology (GO) cluster analysis showed that the DEGs regulated by GhWRKY16 are classified in diverse molecular functions, cellular components and biological processes.
Project description:The G. hirsutum mutant li1 is caused by a dominant mutation which has pleiotropic effects on plant development. To get information for molecular effects by li1 mutation on cotton fiber development, we examined expression patterns of over 5000 genes by cDNA array from 6 to 18 DPA in a 3-day interval between li1 mutant and normal fibers. RNAs from li1 mutant fibers at 6-, 9-, 12-, 15-, and 18-DPA were compared to normal fiber RNA at each corresponding time points. Four biological repeats were carried out including two dye-swap ones.
Project description:A cDNA library from 0-10 day post anthesis cotton ovules was established to study genes expressed in cotton ovule during initiation and quickly elongation period. We randomly sequenced over 100,000 ESTs from this library and acquired a gene pool of more than 28,000 UniESTs. The cotton UniESTs were then PCR-amplified and printed onto microarray. This array is comprised of about 28000 high-quality cotton cDNAs (with average length>750bp) and external controls. To study the different growth potential of cotton fibers in a one-year cycle, we then hybridized the array with RNA samples derived from +7 DPA wild-type upland cotton fibers in four different seasons, respectively.
Project description:Transcriptional profiling of cotton fibers during development. Time course at 6 days post anthesis (dpa), 10 dpa, 20 dpa, and 24 dpa. All referenced to 20 dpa.
Project description:The G. hirsutum mutant li1 is caused by a dominant mutation which has pleiotropic effects on plant development. To get information for molecular effects by li1 mutation on cotton fiber development, we examined expression patterns of over 5000 genes by cDNA array from 6 to 18 DPA in a 3-day interval between li1 mutant and normal fibers. Keywords: Mutant and normal fiber comparison