Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA379194 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR5343940_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR5343940_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR5343941_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR5343941_2.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR5343942_1.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 24 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:Haploid segregants from a cross between the yeast strains BY4716 and RM11-1a as in Brem et al. 2002 and Yvert et al. 2003. This series contains all GSE617 samples (re-submitted for convenience), plus 27 additional segregants assayed with the same protocol and the same reference sample as GSE617. Keywords: other
2005-01-20 | GSE1990 | GEO
Project description:To determine the genomic location of a gene that permits xylose utilization we conducted bulk segregant analysis (BSA) using Affymetrix yeast tiling arrays. BSA works by taking advantage of DNA sequence polymorphisms between different strains and the fact that it is relatively easy to pool large numbers of meiotic spore products (segregants) in yeast. Pooling segregants based on their phenotype allows the region of the genome responsible for the phenotype to be detected. This is because DNA polymorphisms in regions unlinked to the locus causing the phenotype will segregate randomly and be “evened” out, while around the genomic region of interest, sequences or polymorphisms responsible for the trait will be present in all positive segregants, and absent in all negative segregants. In our case, a Simi White wine strain (S. cerevisiae) carrying the locus responsible for xylose utilization was crossed to a laboratory strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae; this strain was estimated to carry DNA polymorphisms relative to the laboratory strain at a level of approximately .5%. Spores from the Simi White / S288c diploid were screened for the xylose utilization phenotype and 39 positive spores were combined into one pool and 39 negative spores into another pool, and genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from each pool. We then hybridized the positive and negative gDNA pools to tiling microarrays that were based on the S288c reference genome with the expectation that regions of the genome derived from Simi White will hybridize less robustly to the array because of the DNA polymorphisms between Simi White and S288c. Log2 ratios of probe intensities were calculated (negative/positive), and a peak appeared in the chromosome XV right subtelomeric region that corresponds to less robust hybridization to the microarray of the positive pool gDNA coming from this region of the genome
2010-04-09 | GSE19120 | GEO
Project description:In order to narrow candidate QTL loci into relevant genes driving disease differences, we assessed transcriptional differences across the pre-CC population used to map phenotypic QTL. We integrate this normalized expression data with polymorphisms underneath a candidate locus to arrive at a high priority candidate gene which had genetic variants private to the causal haplotype and also had expression strongly correlated with the appropriate trait (SARS-CoV viral lung load at 4 DPI).
2017-03-31 | GSE93283 | GEO
Project description:We profiled the time-dependent expression levels of a set of 95 genomically characterized haploid yeast segregants in response to rapamycin. They were derived from two genetically diverse parental yeast strains, BY4716 and RM11. Both parental strains have been sequenced. Our goal is to capture widespread transcriptional changes over time, and to leverage on both the temporal and genetic variations to construct regulatory networks.
2011-11-03 | E-MTAB-412 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Array hybridization data for 611 yeast segregants to determine genotype at each marker. DNA from each segregant was digested with DNAseI, labeled with Cy5-ddATP, and hybridized individually to a custom agilent 8x15k, genotyping array . Note: Tetrad refers to the tetrad from the cross of YJM145 x S288c that each segregant was dissected from. Tag ID refers to unique yeast barcode has been integrated at the ho locus in a segregant.
2012-06-29 | E-MTAB-724 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Open chromatin provides access to a wide spectrum of DNA binding proteins for DNA metabolism processes such as transcription, repair, recombination, and replication. In this regard, open chromatin profiling has been widely used to identify the location of regulatory regions, including promoters, enhancers, insulators, silencers, replication origins, and recombination hotspots. For a quantitative getic analysis of chromatin regulation, we generated open chromatin maps of 100 yeast samples including the parental strains (BY and RM, and two replicates for each) and their descendants by using the FAIRE-seq technique Open chromatin in two parental strains and 94 segregants of their crossing
2012-11-02 | E-GEOD-33466 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:MyoD and NeuroD2 are master regulators of myogenesis and neurogenesis and bind to a "shared" E-box sequence (CAGCTG) and a "private" sequence (CAGGTG or CAGATG, respectively). To determine whether private-site recognition is sufficient to confer lineage-specification, we generated a MyoD-mutant with the DNA binding specificity of NeuroD2. Our results demonstrate that redirecting MyoD binding from MyoD-private sites to NeuroD2-private sites, despite preserved binding to the MyoD/NeuroD2-shared sites, is sufficient to change MyoD from a master regulator of myogenesis to a master regulator of neurogenesis.
2015-07-31 | GSE64626 | GEO
Project description:Transcription profile in YPD media of 48 segregants spores obtained from a cross of the yeast strains S96 and YJM789. These spores are a subset of those published by Mancera et al, Nature, 2008. Two CEL files were mislabelled: eQTL_080822_spore_38B.CEL and eQTL_080826_spore_21C.CEL, actually spores 24A and 8D respectively. The correct spore IDs are in the sample annotation (under StrainOrLine).
2010-10-06 | E-TABM-845 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In this study, we mapped for the first time differences in transcription binding among individuals and elucidated the genetic basis of such variation. Whole-genome Ste12 binding profiles were determined using ChIP-Seq in pheromone-treated cells of 43 segregants of a cross between two highly diverged yeast strains, YJM789 and S288c as well as the parental lines. We identified extensive Ste12 binding variation among individuals and mapped underlying cis- and trans- acting loci responsible for such variation. We showed that the majority of TF binding variation is cis-linked and that many variations are associated with polymorphisms residing in the binding motifs of Ste12 as well as those of several known and proposed Ste12 cofactors. We also identified two trans factors, AMN1 and FLO8, that modulate Ste12 binding to promoters of more than 10 genes under α-factor treatment. Neither of these two genes was known to regulate Ste12 previously, and we suggest that they may be key mediators of gene activity and phenotypic diversity. Ste12 binding strongly correlates with gene expression for more than 200 genes indicating that binding variation is functional. Many of the variable bound genes are involved in cell wall organization and biogenesis. Overall, we identified key regulators of molecular diversity among individuals and provide novel insights into mechanisms of gene regulation. Two ChIP-Seq experiments and one Input DNA-Seq experiment for the yeast strains S96, HS959 and 43 MATa segregants were performed under alpha factor treatment conditions; an additional replicate was also performed for some of the strains. One ChIP-Seq experiment for each parental strain was performed without alpha factor treatment, and one ChIP-Seq experiment for each of the 24 deletion strains was performed under alpha factor treatment.
2010-02-18 | E-GEOD-19635 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:MyoD and NeuroD2 are master regulators of myogenesis and neurogenesis and bind to a "shared" E-box sequence (CAGCTG) and a "private" sequence (CAGGTG or CAGATG, respectively). To determine whether private-site recognition is sufficient to confer lineage-specification, we generated a MyoD-mutant with the DNA binding specificity of NeuroD2. Our results demonstrate that redirecting MyoD binding from MyoD-private sites to NeuroD2-private sites, despite preserved binding to the MyoD/NeuroD2-shared sites, is sufficient to change MyoD from a master regulator of myogenesis to a master regulator of neurogenesis. ChIP-seq profiling of MyoD, NeuroD2 and chimera mutants in mouse P19 cells transfected with these genes. The chimeric mutants are MyoD with the bHLH domain replaced with the NeuroD2 bHLH domain.
2015-07-31 | E-GEOD-64626 | biostudies-arrayexpress