Expression Characteristics of Genes Hypermethylated and Downregulated in Rat Liver Specific to Non-genotoxic Hepatocarcinogens
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA508720 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Similar Datasets
Project description:The present study examined hypermethylated and downregulated genes specific to carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) by Methyl-Seq analysis combined with expression microarray analysis in the liver of rats treated with CCl4 or N-nitrosodiethylamine (DEN) for 28 days, by excluding those with DEN.
2019-05-09 | GSE123408 | GEO
Project description:Liver tumors in rodents are frequently induced by non-genotoxic carcinogens. These hepatocarcinogens generally activate hepatic nuclear receptors (e.g., CAR and PXR), resulting in a cascade of signals causing modifications in the expression of genes responsible for several processes involved in carcinogenesis. Evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of chemicals is a regulatory requirement but is time-consuming and expensive. Consequently, several short-term in vivo and in vitro approaches, using molecular tools, have been proposed as predictive models for non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens. The objective of our study was to discriminate between chemicals that are either non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens or merely hepatotoxicants and also between CAR and PXR modulators on the basis of their gene expression profiles. Thus, we treated rats for seven days with the hepatoxicants, diclofenac and diazepam, or with several CAR and PXR modulators, which were mainly hepatocarcinogens. Different hepatic gene expression profiles were obtained not only between the hepatotoxicants and the non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens but also between the CAR activators phenobarbital, phenytoin and 1,1-bis-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethene which were grouped together, and the two PXR activators pregnenolone 16α-carbonitrile and clotrimazole. Diethylstilbestrol had an expression profile that was quite distinct from the other PXR activators, suggesting that this compound is certainly not a classic PXR modulator. Moreover, some differences were observed between phenytoin (not considered as a hepatocarcinogen), and the other two CAR activators. Our data therefore indicate that discrimination is possible between hepatocarcinogens and hepatotoxicants, between CAR and PXR modulators and also between compounds within the same class of modulators using a short-term transcriptomic approach.
2013-07-31 | GSE39350 | GEO
Project description:Liver tumors in rodents are frequently induced by non-genotoxic carcinogens. These hepatocarcinogens generally activate hepatic nuclear receptors (e.g., CAR and PXR), resulting in a cascade of signals causing modifications in the expression of genes responsible for several processes involved in carcinogenesis. Evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of chemicals is a regulatory requirement but is time-consuming and expensive. Consequently, several short-term in vivo and in vitro approaches, using molecular tools, have been proposed as predictive models for non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens. The objective of our study was to discriminate between chemicals that are either non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens or merely hepatotoxicants and also between CAR and PXR modulators on the basis of their gene expression profiles. Thus, we treated rats for seven days with the hepatoxicants, diclofenac and diazepam, or with several CAR and PXR modulators, which were mainly hepatocarcinogens. Different hepatic gene expression profiles were obtained not only between the hepatotoxicants and the non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens but also between the CAR activators phenobarbital, phenytoin and 1,1-bis-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethene which were grouped together, and the two PXR activators pregnenolone 16α-carbonitrile and clotrimazole. Diethylstilbestrol had an expression profile that was quite distinct from the other PXR activators, suggesting that this compound is certainly not a classic PXR modulator. Moreover, some differences were observed between phenytoin (not considered as a hepatocarcinogen), and the other two CAR activators. Our data therefore indicate that discrimination is possible between hepatocarcinogens and hepatotoxicants, between CAR and PXR modulators and also between compounds within the same class of modulators using a short-term transcriptomic approach. CAR or PXR inducers were administered in suspension to rats (7 weeks old at start of treatment) by oral gavage at a daily dose for 7 consecutive days. Treatment-related changes in gene expression were determined in the liver using whole genome oligonucleotide microarrays.
2013-07-31 | E-GEOD-39350 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:This study examined hypermethylated and downregulated genes specific to carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) by Methyl-Seq analysis combined with expression microarray analysis in the liver of rats treated with CCl4 or N-nitrosodiethylamine (DEN) for 28 days, by excluding those with DEN. Among 52 genes, Ldlrad4, Proc, Cdh17, and Nfia were confirmed to show promoter-region hypermethylation by methylation-specific quantitative PCR analysis on day 28. The transcript levels of these 4 genes decreased by real-time reverse transcription-PCR analysis in the livers of rats treated with nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens for up to 90 days compared with untreated controls and genotoxic hepatocarcinogens. Immunohistochemically, LDLRAD4 and PROC showed decreased immunoreactivity, forming negative foci, in glutathione S-transferase placental form (GST-P)+ foci, and incidences of LDLRAD4- and PROC- foci in GST-P+ foci induced by treatment with nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens for 84 or 90 days were increased compared with those with genotoxic hepatocarcinogens. In contrast, CDH17 and NFIA responded to hepatocarcinogens without any relation to the genotoxic potential of carcinogens. All 4 genes did not respond to renal carcinogens after treatment for 28 days. Considering that Ldlrad4 is a negative regulator of transforming growth factor-β signaling, Proc participating in p21WAF1/CIP1 upregulation by activation, Cdh17 inducing cell cycle arrest by gene knockdown, and Nfia playing a role in a tumor-suppressor, all these genes may be potential in vivo epigenetic markers of nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens from the early stages of treatment in terms of gene expression changes. LDLRAD4 and PROC may have a role in the development of preneoplastic lesions produced by nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens.
| S-EPMC6484883 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In order to screen candidate genes that discriminate genotoxic hepatocarcinogens from nongenotoxic ones, we compared gene expression in the liver of mice treated with 6 genotoxic hepatocarcinogens or 5 nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens.
2011-10-27 | GSE33248 | GEO
Project description:Several studies have successfully detected hepatocarcinogenicity in rats based on gene expression data. Here, we constructed a model for detecting non-genotoxic (NGTX) hepatocarcinogens and predicted their MOAs in rats. Piperonyl butoxide (PBO) and Dammar resin (DAM) are NGTX hepatocarcinogens. Gene expression data in the liver treated by PBO and DAM was used for validation of constructed model.
2015-07-29 | GSE71413 | GEO
Project description:In order to screen candidate genes that discriminate genotoxic hepatocarcinogens from nongenotoxic ones, we compared gene expression in the liver of mice treated with 6 genotoxic hepatocarcinogens or 5 nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens. 6 genotoxic and 2 non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens with expression time of 4h, 20h, 14 days, and 28 days
2011-10-26 | E-GEOD-33248 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The need for an efficient carcinogenicity test prompted this study, in which we used a microarray-based genomics approach, with a short-term in vivo model, in combination with insights from statistical and mechanistic analyses. We performed additional experiments to support the significance of the microarray results. Carcinogens were evaluated based on differences in the mechanisms involved in the response to genotoxic (GTX) carcinogens and non-genotoxic (NGTX) carcinogens. Microarray data were analyzed for 2 time points after treatment with the following 6 carcinogens. The analysis was performed using t-tests to compare the fold changes, and we selected differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and evaluated the reasons for differential expression in terms of cellular pathways and processes. We mapped the DEG-related pathways to analyze cellular processes, and we were able to uncover significant mechanisms that involve critical cellular components, such as CDKN1A (p21) and BAX. In addition, a comparison of the data from two time points showed that the repeated administration model was more effective than a single administration for carcinogen research. The classification analysis of selected DEGs was performed by setting microarray data of 4 carcinogens as test sets; these test sets were evaluated as classifiers. Microarray results were further supported using the Comet and micronucleus assays. It was found that gene expression profiling using microarrays, followed by pathway analysis, was effective in increasing the understanding of the characteristics of different carcinogens, and the efficiency of these methods was exemplified by the short-term (3 day) nature of the animal experiments. The following 10 hepatocarcinogens were used: 2-acetylaminofluorene (53-96-3), diethylnitrosamine (55-18-5), 4-dimethylamino-3'-methyl azobenzene (55-80-1), clofibrate (637-07-0), 1,4-dioxane (123-91-1), DL-ethionine (67-21-0), 1,3-dichloro-2'-propanol (96-23-1), urethane (51-79-6), sodium nitrite (7632-00-0), and methyleugenol (93-15-2). Forty-one data were obtained for the training compounds in this study. We treated rats with one of three compounds or a control for each GTX and NGTX experimental group and measured 2 time points for each group. All experimental procedures were repeated three times. We excluded 1 file that was found to be a failure. Each ‘.CEL’ file obtained as a raw data file was standardized using the RMA (Robust Multi-array Average) algorithm.
2011-08-10 | E-GEOD-31307 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:In this study we performed microarray-based molecular profiling of liver samples from Wistar rats exposed to genotoxic carcinogens (GC), nongenotoxic carcinogens (NGC) or non-hepatocarcinogens (NC) for up to 14 days. In contrast to previous toxicogenomics studies aimed at the inference of molecular signatures for assessing the potential and mode of compound carcinogenicity, we considered multi-level omics data. Besides evaluating the predictive power of signatures observed on individual biological levels, such as mRNA, miRNA and protein expression, we also introduced novel feature representations which capture putative molecular interactions or pathway alterations by integrating expression profiles across platforms interrogating different biological levels. Male Wistar rats were treated by oral gavage with the eight nongenotoxic hepatocarcinogens Phenobarbital sodium (PB), Piperonylbutoxide (PBO), Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), Acetamide (AA), Methapyrilene HCl (MPy), Methylcarbamate (Mcarb), Diethylstilbestrol (DES) and Ethionine (ETH), the two genotoxic carcinogens C.I Direct Black (CIDB) and dimethylnitrosamine (DMN), the two non-hepatocarcinogens Cefuroxime (CFX) and Nifedipine (Nif), and the three compounds with undefined carcinogenic class Cyproterone acetate (CPA), Thioacetamid (TAA) and Wy-14643 (Wy). Depending on the administered compound, livers were taken after 3, 7, or 14 days for histopathological evaluation. From the five animals per treatment group three animals were selected based on the histopathological findings and subjected to molecular profiling using Affymetrix RG-230A arrays (mRNA expression), Agilent G4473A arrays (miRNA expression) and Zeptosens ZeptoMARK reverse arrays (protein expression).
2014-08-18 | E-GEOD-53083 | biostudies-arrayexpress