Project description:Single cell RNA-seq of the human alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma cell line Rh41. We also inlcude a bulk RNA-seq study of unsorted and sorted cells using CD44 as a marker
Project description:Purpose: To analyze the sensitivity and specificity of the AmpFISH method, we sequenced the NIH3T3 cell line via UMI-RNAseq experiments. Methods:NIH3T3 cells were grown in DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium, Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum, Sigma), 50U/ml Penicillin and 50 mg/ml streptomycin (Gibco,cat.no.15070) at 37℃ with 5% CO2. Cells were treated with 0.25% trypsin solution (HyClone, No.SH42605.01) when they reached ~106 cells/ml. Then, the cells were washed with 1X PBS, and then mixed with 1ml TRIzol solution (ThermoFish, No.15596029), and snap-frozen with dry ice. Total RNA was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated as follows: (1) the RNA sample was initially qualitatively evaluated using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis for possible contamination and degradation; (2) RNA purity and concentration were then examined using NanoPhotometer spectrophotometer; (3) RNA integrity and quantity were finally measured using RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 system. After library preparation and pooling of different samples, the samples were subjected to Illumina sequencing. The libraries were sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 Platform for 6G raw data and generated 150nt pair-end reads. UMI sequences on each read were identified by UMI-tools (1.0.0), and reads with UMIs were used for the subsequent analysis. To identify the duplicated reads, UMIs were initially removed from the UMI reads, and the remaining parts of each read were mapped to the reference genome using Hisat2. Reads that mapped to the same location on the reference genome were identified as duplicated reads. Then, the UMIs on each read were recalled, and the duplicated reads with the same UMI were identified as non-natural duplications, which were subsequently removed from the processed data. HTSeq v0.6.1 was used to count the read numbers mapped to each gene. Then, the FPKM of each gene was calculated based on the length of the gene, and the read count was mapped to the gene. Conclusions:AmpFISH provides convenient and versatile tools for sensitive RNA/DNA detection and to gain useful information on cellular molecules using simple workflows
Project description:We sequenced single cells coming from three developmental stages of chicken forelimb. We identified different cell populations with distinct transcriptional profiles. The supplementary file contains processed UMI count matrices, which also include meta data of each cell, e.g. cluster.
Project description:Comparison of single cell RNAseq and single nucleus RNAseq on four healthy human liver caudate lobes, with cell-types validated using one slice of a fifth healthy human for VISIUM Spatial Transcriptomics. Raw UMI count tables can be found here: https://figshare.com/projects/Human_Liver_SC_vs_SN_paper/98981 Processed Seurat Objects can be found here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sso15ehqmrrh6mk/AACKHOsSlZW0_Zy9cbCkOmMfa?dl=0
Project description:In this study, 7530 newborn pancreatic β-cells were analyzed by single-cell sequencing. Cell Ranger was used to compare the original sequencing data, count the genome, filter background cells and cell transcript UMI, and use cell barcode to generate gene-barcode matrix. Then the samples were grouped, gene expression analysis, etc., and the statistical results of each sample sequencing data were output