Project description:Genomic profiles of DLBCL (Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma) patients 20 DLBCL patients were selected for detection of genomic aberrations
Project description:Genomic profiles of DLBCL (Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma) patients 20 DLBCL patients were selected for detection of genomic aberrations Patient's DNA were hybridized against Promega control on Agilent G4410B arrays and scanned with the Agilent G2505B scanner.
Project description:RNA extracted from diagnostic tumor samples of 52 patients affected by DLBCL was analyzed on the nCounter system using the PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel.
Project description:FFPE tissue sections of lymphoma patients were analyzed. All patients were enrolled in prospective multicenter DSHNHL clinical trials. The study included DLBCL samples from 357 patients.
Project description:Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is currently divided into three main molecular subtypes, defined by gene expression profiling (GEP): Germinal Center B-cell like (GCB), Activated B-Cell like (ABC), and Primary Mediastinal B-cell Lymphoma (PMBL). DLBCL subtypes were determined according to patients' gene expression profiles.
Project description:Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent entity among non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). It is a clinically and biologically heterogeneous disease regarding treatment response and long-term outcome. The anthracycline-based regimen R-CHOP is still considered as the standard of care for first-line treatment allowing achieving a complete response for approximately 60% of the patients. The prognosis of patients with primary refractory or relapsed (R/R) disease is particularly poor with a median overall survival below one year. Only a fraction of R/R patients can be cured with salvage therapies due to the acquisition of chemoresistance. We conducted a large-scale and deep proteomic investigation of the proteome profiles of R/R DLBCL patients compared to chemosensitive patients in order to identify new potential biomarkers related to resistance to treatment and to better understand the biological mechanisms underlying chemoresistance.
Project description:This study performed an in-depth investigation of the immune-molecular profiles of an unique cohort of extranodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the bone, with single primary bone (PB-)DLBCL and multiple localizations (polyostotic-DLBCL). A similar DLBCL cohort with nodal localizations only and germinal center B-cell (GCB) phenotype (nodal-DLBCL-GCB) was used as comparator. With comprehensive genomic mutational and gene gene-expression profiling (GEP), in total 103 DLBCLS were analyzed. Both molecular techniques revealed a shared mutational genomic and gene-expression transcriptomic profile for PB-DLBCL (n=51) and polyostotic-DLBCL (n=18), justifying a collective analysis as bone-DLBCL. Differential incidences of EZH2, IRF8, and HIST1H1E, and MYC mutations/rearrangements (p<0.05) confirmed the distinct oncogenic evolution of bone-DLBCL and nodal-DLBCL-GCB (n=34). Bone-DLBCL primarily exhibited an intermediate/rich immune TME GEP signature (p≤<0.005), based on published gene sets. Further unsupervised clustering identified two distinct groups, establishing a notable ‘immune-rich’ cluster dominated by bone-DLBCL (754%, p=0.0062). This immune-rich cluster demonstrated superior survival (p=≤0.0263) compared to the ‘immune-low’ cluster, which consisted mostly of nodal-DLBCL-GCB cases (61%). Gene-set enrichment analysis illustrated variations in cell proliferation and immune systemreceptor pathways for the immune-rich cluster (p<0.001), indicating a crucial role for the tumor microenvironment (TME) in disease behavior and outcome. Further supported by deconvolution applications (CIBERSORTx and single-sample gene-set enrichment analysis), The immune-rich cluster highlighted highlighting an abundantmainly regulatory T cells in immune-rich and cell proliferation in immune-low. infiltrate of NK/T, Treg, TFH and follicular dendritic cells (p<0.001). Conclusively, PB-DLBCL and polyostotic-DLBCL shared similar TME features and immune-molecular profiles. This study delineates tThe distinct immune-rich TME profile of bone-DLBCL, which is associated with a superior survival. These findings suggest that bone-DLBCL patients with immune-rich GEP might benefit from less intensive polychemotherapies and this could further shape targeted immunomodulatory strategies.
Project description:The main purpose of the study was to identify biological prognostic factors that could be used to define poor risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients. We used exon array profiling to screen differentially expressed genes and splicing variants between clinically high risk patients, who have relapsed or remained in remission in response to dose dense chemoimmunotherapy. Study population consisted of 43 high-risk DLBCL/FL grade 3 patients less than 65 years old. The patients were treated in the Nordic phase II protocol with six courses of R-CHOEP14 followed by systemic central nervous system prophylaxis with one course of high dose methotrexate and one course of high dose cytarabine.
Project description:Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has striking clinical and molecular variability. Although a more precise identification of the multiple determinants of this variability is still under investigation, there is a consensus that high-clinical-risk DLBCL cases require a risk-adapted therapy, since intensification of chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) has been shown to improve the prognosis for high-risk patients in randomised clinical trials. In spite of this, the protocols used for these patients have a high morbidity, associated with ASCT and the use of multiple drugs. This makes it important to identify patients that may take benefit from risk-adapted therapies, through the recognition of biological markers that provide information about both the tumoral cells and the microenvironment. Unfortunately, many of the studies so far performed have relied on heterogeneous series of patients, staged or treated with different protocols. For instance, some of the variability in DLBCL arises from the fact that this diagnosis is applied to de novo and secondary tumours, nodal and extranodal, irrespective of clinical stage, patient age and associated infections. Additionally, DLBCL includes some specific variants, such as mediastinal DLBCL and T/HRBCL, with specific prognostic parameters. This could prevent the identification of potential predictive biomarkers, because the results of many studies show that the search for predictive biomarkers should be promoted in the context of samples of clinically homogeneous patients enrolled in clinical trials. A further source of variability is the dependence of some predictive markers on specific therapeutic approaches, as is the case for the Bcl6 expression in DLBCL, since Bcl-6+ cases have been shown not to benefit from the addition of R to CHOP. Here we have analysed a series of high-clinical-risk DLBCLs by a two-stage approach, first identifying functional signatures by expression analysis, then analysing surrogate biomarkers using tissue microarrays (TMAs). This eclectic approach could reveal new aspects of the relationship between the neoplastic cells and the microenvironment, leading to the identification of previously unknown prognostic markers. At the same time, the use of functional signatures to analyse expression-profiling data avoids the poor reproducibility of the data obtained from gene-by-gene analysis, and benefits from the existence of a growing body of data concerning the major pathways deregulated in DLBCL. To avoid the bias of semiquantitative scoring, in this study we have quantified the markers included in the multivariate analysis. Keywords: new biological variables, risk-adapted therapies