Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

A molecular mechanism to regulate neural-specific A-to-I editing during development

ABSTRACT: A molecular mechanism to regulate neural-specific A-to-I editing during development

PROVIDER: PRJNA637637 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR11937800.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR11937801.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR11937802.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR11937785.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR11937786.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 18

Similar Datasets

A molecular mechanism to regulate neural-specific A-to-I editing during development

Project description:Using a combination of molecular and genomic approaches we uncover a molecular mechanism that regulates RNA editing in a neural- and development-specific manner. We de novo identified 570 A-to-i editing sites in adult neural RNA-seq data and 6202 sites from re-analyzing L1 neural RNA seq.Comparing editomes during development led to the identification of both neural transcripts that were edited only in one life-stage. The stage-specific editing is largely regulated by differential gene expression during neural development, and proper gene expression of nearly one-third of these differentially expressed genes is dependent on adr-2, the only known A-to-I editing enzyme in C. elegans. However, we also identified a subset of neural transcripts which are edited and expressed throughout development. Interestingly, despite a neural-specific downregulation of adr-2 during development, the majority of sites edited throughout development exhibit increased editing in adult neural cells. Biochemical data suggests that ADR-1, a deaminase deficient member of the Adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) family is competing with ADR-2 for binding to specific transcripts early in development. Our data suggest a model where during neural development, ADR-2 levels overcome ADR-1 repression, resulting in increased ADR-2 binding and editing of specific transcripts. Together, our findings reveal tissue- and development-specific regulation of RNA editing and identify a molecular mechanism that regulates ADAR substrate recognition and editing efficiency.

2020-06-06 | GSE151916 | GEO

Profiling neural editomes reveals a molecular mechanism to regulate RNA editing during development.

Project description:Adenosine (A) to inosine (I) RNA editing contributes to transcript diversity and modulates gene expression in a dynamic, cell type-specific manner. During mammalian brain development, editing of specific adenosines increases, whereas the expression of A-to-I editing enzymes remains unchanged, suggesting molecular mechanisms that mediate spatiotemporal regulation of RNA editing exist. Herein, by using a combination of biochemical and genomic approaches, we uncover a molecular mechanism that regulates RNA editing in a neural- and development-specific manner. Comparing editomes during development led to the identification of neural transcripts that were edited only in one life stage. The stage-specific editing is largely regulated by differential gene expression during neural development. Proper expression of nearly one-third of the neurodevelopmentally regulated genes is dependent on adr-2, the sole A-to-I editing enzyme in C. elegans However, we also identified a subset of neural transcripts that are edited and expressed throughout development. Despite a neural-specific down-regulation of adr-2 during development, the majority of these sites show increased editing in adult neural cells. Biochemical data suggest that ADR-1, a deaminase-deficient member of the adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) family, is competing with ADR-2 for binding to specific transcripts early in development. Our data suggest a model in which during neural development, ADR-2 levels overcome ADR-1 repression, resulting in increased ADR-2 binding and editing of specific transcripts. Together, our findings reveal tissue- and development-specific regulation of RNA editing and identify a molecular mechanism that regulates ADAR substrate recognition and editing efficiency.

| S-EPMC7849389 | biostudies-literature

RNA-seq of Mus musculus to investigate the role of RNA editing for the gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of the hypothalamus

Project description:RNA editing is essential for the formation of functional properties of ionotropic glutamate channels. Previously, we demonstrated the regulation of RNA editing upon manipulation with neural activity in vitro. The hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), which serve as a master circadian pacemaker depends on glutamatergic neurotransmission, in particular for signal transmission from the retina, and they exhibit spontaneous 24h rhythmical neural activity. We observed changes in the extent of ionotropic glutamate receptor RNA editing in the SCN during the 24h cycle. Therefore, we aimed to understand the overall role of RNA editing for the mechanism of SCN function and to evaluate the impact of RNA under editing on gene expression.

2023-06-29 | E-MTAB-11408 | biostudies-arrayexpress

ANKRD11 Binds to Cohesin to Regulate Neural and Craniofacial Development

Project description:ANKRD11 Binds to Cohesin to Regulate Neural and Craniofacial Development

| PRJNA1144149 | ENA

Bidirectional histone monoaminylation dynamics regulate neural rhythmicity

Project description:Bidirectional histone monoaminylation dynamics regulate neural rhythmicity

| PRJNA1126622 | ENA

Bidirectional histone monoaminylation dynamics regulate neural rhythmicity

Project description:Bidirectional histone monoaminylation dynamics regulate neural rhythmicity

| PRJNA1126624 | ENA

Bidirectional histone monoaminylation dynamics regulate neural rhythmicity

Project description:Bidirectional histone monoaminylation dynamics regulate neural rhythmicity

| PRJNA1126631 | ENA

FoxOs cooperatively regulate diverse pathways governing neural stem cell homeostasis

Project description:FoxOs cooperatively regulate diverse pathways governing neural stem cell homeostasis expression profile between six independant neural stem cell lines (three FoxO null and three wild type) were compared

2009-12-31 | E-GEOD-18308 | biostudies-arrayexpress

The dsRBP and inactive editor, ADR-1, utilizes dsRNA binding to regulate A-to-I RNA editing across the C. elegans transcriptome

Project description:Purpose: The purpose of this experiment is to expand the repertoire of C. elegans edited transcripts and identify the roles of ADR-1 as indirect regulator of editing and ADR-2 as the only active deaminase in vivo. Methods: Strand-specific RNA sequencing of wild-type and adr mutant worms, followed by a novel RNA variant calling and comparative analysis pipeline. Results: Despite lacking deaminase function, ADR-1 affects editing of over 60 adenosines within the 3’ UTRs of 16 different mRNAs. Furthermore, ADR-1 interacts directly with ADR-2 substrates, even in the absence of ADR-2; and mutations within its dsRNA binding domains abolished both binding and editing regulation. Conclusions: ADR-1 acts as a major regulator of editing by binding ADR-2 substrates in vivo and raises the possibility that other dsRNA binding proteins, including the inactive human ADARs, regulate RNA editing by deaminase-independent mechanisms. Strand-specific RNA sequencing of wild-type and adr mutant worms, followed by a novel RNA variant calling and comparative analysis pipeline.

2014-01-20 | E-GEOD-51556 | biostudies-arrayexpress

KLF4 inhibits early neural differentiation of ESCs by coordinating specific 3D chromatin structure, a new mechanism of early neural differentiation

Project description:Circular RNA has been reported to be dynamically expressed during embryonic development and regulates human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), but the identification and regulation of functional circular RNA in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) remains unclear. Neural differentiation of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) requires precisely orchestrated gene regulation, a process governed in part by changes in 3D chromatin structure. How these changes regulate gene expression in this context remains unclear. In this study, we observed enrichment of the transcription factor KLF4 at some poised or closed enhancers at TSS-linked regions of genes associated with neural differentiation. Combination analysis of ChIP, HiChIP and RNA-seq data indicated that KLF4 loss in ESCs induced changes in 3D chromatin structure, including increased chromatin interaction loops between neural differentiation-associated genes and active enhancers, leading to upregulated expression of neural differentiation-associated genes and therefore early neural differentiation. This study suggests KLF4 inhibits early neural differentiation by regulation of 3D chromatin structure, which is a new mechanism of early neural differentiation. Conclusions: Our study suggests KLF4 inhibits early neural differentiation by regulation of 3D chromatin structure, which is a new mechanism of early neural differentiation.

2022-09-20 | GSE213418 | GEO

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data