Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA640755 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR12060200.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR12060201.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR12060202.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR12060203.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR12060192.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 12 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:The role of rpoS gene in the formation of Escherichia coli biofilms were investigated. The gene expression was compared among E. coli MG1655 wild type strain and rpoS knock-out strain in the biofilms, the planktonic exponential phase, and the planktonic stationary phase. The analysis revealed that the wild type bilfilms (WBF) showed similar pattern of gene expression with the WT planktonic stationary phase (WS), whereas the rpoS knock-out biofilms (MBF) showed similar pattern of gene expression with the wild type planktonic exponential phase (WE). Genes involved in the energy metabolism and the flagella synthesis showed higher expression in the rpoS knock-out biofilms (MBF), but not in the wild type biofilms (WBF). Moreover, genes involved in the stress responses showed higher expression in the wild type biofilms (WBF), but not in the rpoS knock-out biofilms (MBF). Keywords: cell type comparison (biofilms vs planktonic cells, wild type vs rpoS knock-out strains)
2008-05-23 | GSE7885 | GEO
Project description:Transcription profile of Escherichia coli cells in mono-species pure planktonic cultures was compared to that of E. coli cells in E. coli-Stenotrophomonas maltophilia dual-species planktonic cultures E. coli cells were separated from dual-species planktonic cultures before total RNA extraction to eliminate possible cross hybridization from S. maltophilia transcripts. The separation method was developed by combining the use of reagent RNAlater and immuno-magnetic separation. Pure E. coli planktonic cultures were processed with the same separation protocol before RNA extraction. Two condition experiments: E. coli mono-species pure planktonic culture vs E. coli in mixed-species planktonic cultures. Two biological replicates with independently grown and harvested planktonic cultures. Each biological replicate has two technical replicates of hybridization on microarray slides. Each slide has three built-in replicates for each probe.
2013-12-30 | E-GEOD-24913 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Transcription profile of Escherichia coli cells in biofilms under static batch culture was compared to that of E. coli cells in planktonic cultures. Both E. coli biofilm and planktonic cultures were cultivated for 18 h in 10% Luria-Bertani broth at room temperature (20 degree Celsius). Biofilms were grown in static batch culture in petri dishes. Both planktonic culture and biofilms were homogenized and run through a separated protocol. Two condition experiments: E. coli biofilm vs E. coli planktonic cultures. Two biological replicates with independently grown and harvested biofilms or planktonic cultures. Each biological replicate has two technical replicates of hybridization on microarray slides. Each slide has three built-in replicates for each probe.
2013-12-30 | E-GEOD-24914 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:Transcription profile of Escherichia coli cells in mono-species pure planktonic cultures was compared to that of E. coli cells in E. coli-Stenotrophomonas maltophilia dual-species planktonic cultures E. coli cells were separated from dual-species planktonic cultures before total RNA extraction to eliminate possible cross hybridization from S. maltophilia transcripts. The separation method was developed by combining the use of reagent RNAlater and immuno-magnetic separation. Pure E. coli planktonic cultures were processed with the same separation protocol before RNA extraction.
2013-12-30 | GSE24913 | GEO
Project description:Escherichia coli biofilms vs planktonic culture
| PRJNA133407 | ENA
Project description:Transcription profile of Escherichia coli cells in biofilms under static batch culture was compared to that of E. coli cells in planktonic cultures. Both E. coli biofilm and planktonic cultures were cultivated for 18 h in 10% Luria-Bertani broth at room temperature (20 degree Celsius). Biofilms were grown in static batch culture in petri dishes. Both planktonic culture and biofilms were homogenized and run through a separated protocol.
2013-12-30 | GSE24914 | GEO
Project description:The role of rpoS gene in the formation of Escherichia coli biofilms were investigated. The gene expression was compared among E. coli MG1655 wild type strain and rpoS knock-out strain in the biofilms, the planktonic exponential phase, and the planktonic stationary phase. The analysis revealed that the wild type bilfilms (WBF) showed similar pattern of gene expression with the WT planktonic stationary phase (WS), whereas the rpoS knock-out biofilms (MBF) showed similar pattern of gene expression with the wild type planktonic exponential phase (WE). Genes involved in the energy metabolism and the flagella synthesis showed higher expression in the rpoS knock-out biofilms (MBF), but not in the wild type biofilms (WBF). Moreover, genes involved in the stress responses showed higher expression in the wild type biofilms (WBF), but not in the rpoS knock-out biofilms (MBF). Experiment Overall Design: Affymetrix E. coli antisense genome array was used to compare the gene expression among E. coli wild type and rpoS konck-out strains in the biofilms, the planktonic exponential phase, and the planktonic stationary phase. All samples were grown in MOPS minimal media with 0.2% glucose. Biofilms were grown for 72 hours on glass surface in flow cells (1x4x40 mm), and planktonic cells were grown for 8 hours (exponential phase) and 12 hours (stationary phase). Experiments were repeated 3 times, which resulted in 3 replicates of 6 different samples.
2008-06-18 | E-GEOD-7885 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:The planktonic versus biofilm gene expression arrays were performed in a/alpha cell types. Gene expression arrays were performed on planktonic vs biofilm cells grown in Spider medium at 37C. Normalized data is reported in matrix.
2011-07-08 | GSE30474 | GEO
Project description:Bacteria are extremely versatile organisms which rapidly adapt to changing environments. When Escherichia coli cells switch from planktonic growth to biofilm, flagellum formation is turned off, and the production of fimbriae and extracellular polysaccharides is switched on. Here we show that BolA protein is a new bacterial transcription factor which modulates the switch from planktonic to sessile lifestyle. BolA negatively modulates flagella biosynthesis and thus swimming capacity. Furthermore, BolA overexpression favors biofilm formation and involvesinvolving fimbriae-like adhesins and curli production. Our results unraveled for the first time that BolA is a protein with high affinity to DNA, involved in the regulation of several genes of E. coli at a genome-wide scale level. Moreover, this observation further demonstrated that the most significant targets of this protein involved a complex network of genes encoding proteins extremely necessary in biofilm development processes. Herein we propose that BolA is a motile/adhesive transcriptional switch, specifically involved in the transition between the planktonic and the attachment stage of biofilm formation process.
2015-02-19 | GSE58623 | GEO
Project description:Transcription profile of sorted Escherichia coli cells was compared to that of non-sorted cells to evaluate the effect of sorting process on transcriptome of E. coli. E. coli cells were harvest from planktonic cultures in annular reactor and stored in RNAlater. Sorting includes 2-min homogenization with OMNI TH homogenizer on ice for E. coli cells pre-stored in RNAlater and then resuspended in nuclease free phosphate buffered saline for sorting with one-step immuno-magnetic separation with anti-E. coli antibody and microbeads on a MACS separator (Miltenyi, Auburn, CA). Two condition experiments: sorted vs non-sorted. Two biological replicates with individually grown and harvested E. coli cells. Each biological replicate has two technical replicates of labeling and hybridization on microarray slides. Each slide has three built-in replicates for each probe.
2010-07-13 | E-GEOD-22885 | biostudies-arrayexpress