Single cell atlas of spinal cord injury in mice reveals a pro-regenerative signature in spinocerebellar neurons
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
PROVIDER: PRJNA722283 | ENA |
REPOSITORIES: ENA
Dataset's files
| Action | DRS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRR14246800.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR14246900.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR14246801.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR14246901.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz | |||
| SRR14246802.fastq.gz | Fastqsanger.gz |
Items per page: 5 1 - 5 of 144 |
Similar Datasets
Project description:After spinal cord injury, tissue distal to the lesion contains undamaged cells that could support or augment recovery. Targeting these cells requires a clearer understanding of their injury responses and capacity for repair. Here, we use single nucleus RNA sequencing to profile how each cell type in the lumbar spinal cord changes after a thoracic injury in mice. We present an atlas of these dynamic responses across dozens of cell types in the acute, subacute, and chronically injured spinal cord. Using this resource, we find rare spinal neurons that express a signature of regeneration in response to injury, including a major population that represent spinocerebellar projection neurons. We characterize these cells anatomically and observed axonal sparing, outgrowth, and remodeling in the spinal cord and cerebellum. Together, this work provides a key resource for studying cellular responses to injury and uncovers the spontaneous plasticity of spinocerebellar neurons, uncovering a potential candidate for targeted therapy.
2022-08-01 | GSE172167 | GEO
Project description:Salamanders have the remarkable ability to functionally regenerate after spinal cord transection. In response to injury, GFAP+ glial cells in the axolotl spinal cord proliferate and migrate to replace the missing neural tube and create a permissive environment for axon regeneration. Molecular pathways that regulate the pro-regenerative axolotl glial cell response are poorly understood. Here we show axolotl glial cells up-regulate AP-1cFos/JunB after injury, which promotes a pro-regenerative glial cell response. Axolotl glial cells directly repress c-Jun expression via up-regulation of miR-200a. Inhibition of miR-200a during regeneration causes defects in axonal regrowth and transcriptomic analysis revealed that miR-200a inhibition leads to differential regulation of genes involved with reactive gliosis, the glial scar, ECM remodeling and axon guidance. This work identifies a novel role for miR-200a in inhibiting reactive gliosis in glial cell in axolotl during spinal cord regeneration
2019-03-19 | GSE122939 | GEO
Project description:Neonatal spinal cord tissues exhibit remarkable regenerative capabilities as compared to adult spinal cord tissues after injury, but the role of extracellular matrix (ECM) in this process has remained elusive. Here, we found that early developmental spinal cord had higher levels of ECMproteins associated with neural development and axon growth, but fewer inhibitory proteoglycans, compared to those of adult spinal cord. Decellularized spinal cord ECM from neonatal (DNSCM) and adult (DASCM) rabbits preserved these differences. DNSCM promoted proliferation, migration, and neuronal differentiation of neural progenitor cells (NPCs) and facilitated axonal outgrowth and regeneration of spinal cord organoids more effectively than DASCM. Pleiotrophin (PTN) and Tenascin (TNC) inDNSCMwere identified as contributors tothese abilities. Furthermore,DNSCMdemonstrated superior performance as a delivery vehicle forNPCs and organoids in spinal cord injury (SCI)models. This suggests that ECMcues from early development stages might significantly contribute to the prominent regeneration ability in spinal cord.
2024-03-01 | GSE242908 | GEO
Project description:The capacity to regenerate the spinal cord after an injury is a coveted trait that only a limited group of non-mammalian organisms can achieve. In Xenopus laevis, this capacity is only present during larval or tadpole stages, but is absent during postmetamorphic frog stages. This provides an excellent model for comparative studies between a regenerative and a non-regenerative stage to identify the cellular and molecular mechanisms that explain the difference in regenerative potential. Here, we used iTRAQ chemistry to obtain a quantitative proteome of the spinal cord 1 day after a transection injury, and used sham operated animals as controls. We quantified a total of 6,384 proteins, with 172 showing significant differential expression in the regenerative stage and 240 in the non-regenerative stage, with an overlap of only 14 proteins. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that while the regenerative stage downregulated synapse/vesicle and mitochondrial proteins, the non-regenerative stage upregulated lipid metabolism proteins, and downregulated ribosomal and translation control proteins. Furthermore, STRING network analysis showed that proteins belonging to these groups are highly interconnected, providing interesting candidates for future functional studies.
2018-01-25 | PXD006993 | Pride
Project description:Neonatal spinal cord tissues exhibit remarkable regenerative capabilities than adult tissues after injury, but the role of extracellular matrix (ECM) in this process has remained elusive. Here we found that early developmental spinal cord had higher levels of ECM proteins associated with neural development and axon growth, but fewer inhibitory proteoglycans compared to adult spinal cord. Decellularized spinal cord ECM from neonatal (DNSCM) and adult (DASCM) rabbits preserved these differences. DNSCM promoted proliferation, migration, and neuronal differentiation of neural progenitor cells (NPCs), and facilitated axonal outgrowth and regeneration of spinal cord organoids than DASCM. Pleiotrophin (PTN) and Tenascin (TNC) in DNSCM were identified as contributors to these abilities. Furthermore, DNSCM demonstrated superior performance as a delivery vehicle for NPCs and organoids in rats with spinal cord injury (SCI). It suggests that ECM cues from early development stages might significantly contribute to the prominent regeneration ability in spinal cord.
2024-01-29 | PXD048991 |
Project description:Neonatal spinal cord tissues exhibit remarkable regenerative capabilities compared to adult tissues following injury. Although some cellular signaling pathways involved in the process have been identified, the specific role of extracellular matrix (ECM) responsible for neonatal spinal cord regeneration has remained elusive. Here we revealed that early developmental spinal cord contained a higher abundance of ECM proteins associated with neural development and axon growth but fewer inhibitory proteoglycans compared to adult spinal cord. Decellularized spinal cord ECM from neonatal (DNSCM) and adult (DASCM) rabbits preserve the major difference of native spinal cord tissues in both stages. Compared to DASCM, DNSCM promoted proliferation, migration, and neuronal differentiation of neural progenitor cells (NPCs), as well as facilitated the long-distance axonal outgrowth and axon regeneration of spinal cord organoids. Pleiotrophin (PTN) and Tenascin (TNC) in DNSCM were identified as contributors to the remarkable neural regeneration ability. Furthermore, DNSCM demonstrated superior performance when used as a delivery vehicle for NPCs and organoids in rats with spinal cord injury (SCI). It suggests that ECM cues derived from different development stage might contribute to the distinct regeneration ability of spinal cord.
2023-09-13 | PXD045337 |
Project description:Background: The efficient regenerative abilities at larvae stages followed by a non-regenerative response after metamorphosis in froglets makes Xenopus an ideal model organism to understand the cellular responses leading to spinal cord regeneration. Methods: We compared the cellular response to spinal cord injury between the regenerative and non-regenerative stages of Xenopus laevis. For this analysis, we used electron microscopy, immunofluorescence and histological staining of the extracellular matrix. We generated two transgenic lines: i) the reporter line with the zebrafish GFAP regulatory regions driving the expression of EGFP, and ii) a cell specific inducible ablation line with the same GFAP regulatory regions. In addition, we used FACS to isolate EGFP + cells for RNAseq analysis. Results: In regenerative stage animals, spinal cord regeneration triggers a rapid sealing of the injured stumps, followed by proliferation of cells lining the central canal, and formation of rosette-like structures in the ablation gap. In addition, the central canal is filled by cells with similar morphology to the cells lining the central canal, neurons, axons, and even synaptic structures. Regeneration is almost completed after 20 days post injury. In non-regenerative stage animals, mostly damaged tissue was observed, without clear closure of the stumps. The ablation gap was filled with fibroblast-like cells, and deposition of extracellular matrix components. No reconstruction of the spinal cord was observed even after 40 days post injury. Cellular markers analysis confirmed these histological differences, a transient increase of vimentin, fibronectin and collagen was detected in regenerative stages, contrary to a sustained accumulation of most of these markers, including chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in the NR-stage. The zebrafish GFAP transgenic line was validated, and we have demonstrated that is a very reliable and new tool to study the role of neural stem progenitor cells (NSPCs). RNASeq of GFAP::EGFP cells has allowed us to clearly demonstrate that indeed these cells are NSPCs. On the contrary, the GFAP::EGFP transgene is mainly expressed in astrocytes in non-regenerative stages. During regenerative stages, spinal cord injury activates proliferation of NSPCs, and we found that are mainly fated to form neurons and glial cells. Specific ablation of these cells abolished proper regeneration, confirming that NSPCs cells are necessary for functional regeneration of the spinal cord. Conclusions: The cellular response to spinal cord injury in regenerative and non-regenerative stages is profoundly different between both stages. A key hallmark of the regenerative response is the activation of NSPCs, which massively proliferate to reconstitute the spinal cord, and are differentiated into neurons. Also very notably, no glial scar formation is observed in regenerative stages, but a transient, glial scar-like structure is formed in non-regenerative stage animals.
2021-01-05 | GSE164204 | GEO
Project description:Harnessing developmental dynamics of spinal cord extracellular matrix improves regenerative potential of spinal cord organoids
| PRJNA1015265 | ENA
Project description:We profiled single cells from mouse spinocerebellar tract neurons (SCTNs) in cervical and thoracic sections of mouse spinal cord, as defined by retrograde projection labeling. For each sample, SCTNs were labeled by injecting CTB (Alexa555 conjugated form, 1µg/µl in PBS) into the cerebellum using NanojetII at P4 and examined at P6-P7. Labeled SCTNs were collected manually from 150-300µm transverse spinal cord, and slices were generated using a razor blade. Labelled cells were manually collected from each injection experiment and then profiled using a plate-based SMART-SCRB protocol (see Baek et al. 2019 for detailed methods)
2019-04-26 | GSE130312 | GEO
Project description:We profiled populations of mouse spinocerebellar tract neurons (SCTNs) in cervical and thoracic sections of mouse spinal cord, as defined by retrograde projection labeling. For each sample, SCTNs were labeled by injecting CTB (Alexa555 conjugated form, 1µg/µl in PBS) into the cerebellum using NanojetII at P4 and examined at P6-P7. Labeled SCTNs were collected manually from 150-300µm transverse spinal cords slices were generated using a razor blade. Cells were collected from each injection experiment and then profiled using standard Illumina bulk RNA-seq protocols
2019-04-18 | GSE129948 | GEO