Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

The F-box cofactor UFO redirects the LEAFY floral regulator to novel cis-elements

ABSTRACT: The F-box cofactor UFO redirects the LEAFY floral regulator to novel cis-elements

PROVIDER: PRJNA842357 | ENA |

REPOSITORIES: ENA

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Dataset's files

Source:

			Action	DRS
	SRR19397081_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR19397081_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR19397082_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR19397082_2.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz
	SRR19397083_1.fastq.gz	Fastqsanger.gz

Items per page:

1 - 5 of 16

Similar Datasets

The F-box cofactor UFO redirects the LEAFY floral regulator to novel cis-elements

Project description:In angiosperms, flower patterning requires the localized expression of the APETALA3 (AP3) floral homeotic gene involved in petal and stamen development. AP3 is synergistically induced by the master transcription factor LEAFY (LFY) and the F-box protein UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS (UFO), but the molecular mechanism underlying this synergy has remained unknown. Here we show that the connection to ubiquitination pathways suggested by the F-box domain of UFO is mostly dispensable and that UFO instead acts by forming a transcriptional complex with LFY on newly discovered regulatory elements. The cryo-electron microscopy structure of the UFO-LFY-DNA complex shows that UFO-DNA contacts allows relocating LFY to novel DNA sites. Finally, we show that this complex has a deep evolutionary origin, largely predating flowering plants. This work unravels an unsuspected role for a member of one of the largest protein families in plants as a modulator of the DNA binding specificity of a master TF.

2023-01-01 | GSE204793 | GEO

The Function of Tetrameric MADS-box Transcription Factors in Floral Fate Determination [Mnase-seq]

Project description:MADS-domain transcription factors (TF) are critical in determining floral cell fate and floral organ identities. However, their function molecular mechanisms are still poorly understood. Here, we show that effective DNA-binding in closed chromatin and target gene regulation of APETALA1 (AP1), a key floral MADS-box TF requires tetramerisation, indicating the fundamental role of tetrameric MADS-box TFs in floral cell fate programming.

2025-11-13 | GSE297049 | GEO

The Function of Tetrameric MADS-box Transcription Factors in Floral Fate Determination [RNA-seq]

2025-11-13 | GSE227950 | GEO

The Function of Tetrameric MADS-box Transcription Factors in Floral Fate Determination [ATAC-seq]

2025-11-13 | GSE227949 | GEO

The Function of Tetrameric MADS-box Transcription Factors in Floral Fate Determination [ChIP-seq]

2025-11-13 | GSE227948 | GEO

The KNOXI gene SHOOT MERISTEMLESS regulates floral fate in Arabidopsis

Project description:Plants have evolved a unique and conserved developmental program that enables the conversion of leaves into floral organs. Elegant genetic and molecular work has identified key regulators of floral meristem identity. However, further understanding of flower meristem specification has been hampered by redundancy and by pleiotropic effects. The KNOXI gene STM transcription factor is a well-characterized regulator of shoot apical meristem maintenance. stm loss-of-function mutants arrest shortly after germination, and therefore the knowledge on later roles of STM, including flower development, is limited. Here, we uncover a role for STM in the specification of flower meristem identity. Silencing STM in the AP1 expression domain in the ap1-4 mutant background resulted in a complete leafy-like flower phenotype and an intermediate stm-2 allele enhanced the floral meristem identity phenotype of ap1-4. Transcriptional profiling of STM perturbation suggested that STM activity affects multiple meristem identity and flower transition genes, among them the F-Box gene UFO. In agreement, stm-2 enhanced the ufo-2 floral meristem fate phenotype, and ectopic UFO expression rescued the leafy flowers in genetic backgrounds with compromised AP1 and STM activities. This work suggests a molecular mechanism that underlies the activity of STM in the specification of flower meristem identity.

2018-05-04 | GSE113894 | GEO

Transcription factor Interplay between LEAFY and APETALA1/ CAULIFLOWER during Floral Initiation

Project description:The transcription factors LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1)_together with the AP1 paralog CAULIFLOWER (CAL)_control the onRep_of flower development in a partially redundant manner. This redundancy is thought to be mediated_at least in part_through the regulation of a shared Rep_of target genes. However_whether these genes are independently or cooperatively regulated by LFY and AP1/CAL_is currently unknown. To better understand the regulatory relationship between LFY and AP1/CAL during floral initiation_we monitored the activity of LFY in the absence of AP1/CAL function. We found that the regulation of several known LFY target genes is unaffected by AP1/CAL perturbation_while others appear to require AP1/CAL activity. Furthermore_we obtained evidence that LFY and AP1/CAL control the expression of some genes in an antagonistic manner. Notably_these include key regulators of floral initiation such TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1)_which had been previously reported to be directly repressed by both LFY and AP1. We show here that TFL1 expression is suppressed by AP1 but promoted by LFY. We further demonstrate that LFY has an inhibitory effect on flower formation in the absence of AP1/CAL activity. We propose that LFY and AP1/CAL may act as part of an incoherent feed-forward loop to control the establishment of a stable developmental program for the formation of flowers.

2017-04-28 | GSE96799 | GEO

Transcription factor Interplay between LEAFY and APETALA1/ CAULIFLOWER during Floral Initiation

Project description:The transcription factors LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1), together with the AP1 paralog CAULIFLOWER (CAL), control the onset of flower development in a partially redundant manner. This redundancy is thought to be mediated, at least in part, through the regulation of a shared set of target genes. However, whether these genes are independently or cooperatively regulated by LFY and AP1/CAL, is currently unknown. To better understand the regulatory relationship between LFY and AP1/CAL during floral initiation, we monitored the activity of LFY in the absence of AP1/CAL function. We found that the regulation of several known LFY target genes is unaffected by AP1/CAL perturbation, while others appear to require AP1/CAL activity. Furthermore, we obtained evidence that LFY and AP1/CAL control the expression of some genes in an antagonistic manner. Notably, these include key regulators of floral initiation such TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1), which had been previously reported to be directly repressed by both LFY and AP1. We show here that TFL1 expression is suppressed by AP1 but promoted by LFY. We further demonstrate that LFY has an inhibitory effect on flower formation in the absence of AP1/CAL activity. We propose that LFY and AP1/CAL may act as part of an incoherent feed-forward loop to control the establishment of a stable developmental program for the formation of flowers.

2017-04-28 | GSE96806 | GEO

Leafy Greens

Project description:Leafy Greens Metagenome

| PRJNA1112879 | ENA

The Function of Tetrameric MADS-box Transcription Factors in Floral Fate Determination

Project description:The Function of Tetrameric MADS-box Transcription Factors in Floral Fate Determination

| PRJNA947552 | ENA