Dataset Information

A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2.

ABSTRACT: Rapid identification of the rise and spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern remains critical for monitoring of the efficacy of diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, and control strategies. A wide range of SARS-CoV-2 next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods have been developed over the last years, but cross-sequence technology benchmarking studies have been scarce. In the current study, 26 clinical samples were sequenced using five protocols: AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 (Illumina), EasySeq RC-PCR SARS-CoV-2 (Illumina/NimaGen), Ion AmpliSeq SARS-CoV-2 (Thermo Fisher), custom primer sets (Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT)), and capture probe-based viral metagenomics (Roche/Illumina). Studied parameters included genome coverage, depth of coverage, amplicon distribution, and variant calling. The median SARS-CoV-2 genome coverage of samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values of 30 and lower ranged from 81.6 to 99.8% for, respectively, the ONT protocol and Illumina AmpliSeq protocol. Correlation of coverage with PCR Ct values varied per protocol. Amplicon distribution signatures differed across the methods, with peak differences of up to 4 log₁₀ at disbalanced positions in samples with high viral loads (Ct values ≤ 23). Phylogenetic analyses of consensus sequences showed clustering independent of the workflow used. The proportion of SARS-CoV-2 reads in relation to background sequences, as a (cost-)efficiency metric, was the highest for the EasySeq protocol. The hands-on time was the lowest when using EasySeq and ONT protocols, with the latter additionally having the shortest sequence runtime. In conclusion, the studied protocols differed on a variety of the studied metrics. This study provides data that assist laboratories when selecting protocols for their specific setting.

SUBMITTER: Carbo EC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10075175 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2.

Carbo Ellen C EC Mourik Kees K Boers Stefan A SA Munnink Bas Oude BO Nieuwenhuijse David D Jonges Marcel M Welkers Matthijs R A MRA Matamoros Sebastien S van Harinxma Thoe Slooten Joost J Kraakman Margriet E M MEM Karelioti Evita E van der Meer David D Veldkamp Karin Ellen KE Kroes Aloys C M ACM Sidorov Igor I de Vries Jutte J C JJC

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology 20230405 6

Rapid identification of the rise and spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern remains critical for monitoring of the efficacy of diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, and control strategies. A wide range of SARS-CoV-2 next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods have been developed over the last years, but cross-sequence technology benchmarking studies have been scarce. In the current study, 26 clinical samples were sequenced using five protocols: Amp ...[more]

PMID: 37017810

Similar Datasets

Project description:Fast and effective methods are needed for sequencing of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genome to track genetic mutations and to identify new and emerging variants during the ongoing pandemic. The objectives were to assess the performance of the SARS-CoV-2 AmpliSeq research panel and S5 plug-in analysis tools for whole-genome sequencing analysis of SARS-CoV-2 and to compare the results with those obtained with the MiSeq-based ARTIC analysis pipeline, using metrics such as depth, coverage, and concordance of single-nucleotide variant (SNV) calls. A total of 191 clinical specimens and a single cultured isolate were extracted and sequenced with AmpliSeq technology and analysis tools. Of the 191 clinical specimens, 83 (with threshold cycle [CT] values of 15.58 to 32.54) were also sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq-based method with the ARTIC analysis pipeline, for direct comparison. A total of 176 of the 191 clinical specimens sequenced on the S5XL system and prepared using the SARS-CoV-2 research panel had nearly complete coverage (>98%) of the viral genome, with an average depth of 5,031×. Similar coverage levels (>98%) were observed for 81/83 primary specimens that were sequenced with both methods tested. The sample with the lowest viral load (CT value of 32.54) achieved 89% coverage using the MiSeq method and failed to sequence with the AmpliSeq method. Consensus sequences produced by each method were identical for 81/82 samples in areas of equal coverage, with a single difference present in one sample. The AmpliSeq approach is as effective as the Illumina-based method using ARTIC v3 amplification for sequencing SARS-CoV-2 directly from patient specimens across a range of viral loads (CT values of 15.56 to 32.54 [median, 22.18]). The AmpliSeq workflow is very easily automated with the Ion Chef and S5 instruments and requires less training and experience with next-generation sequencing sample preparation than the Illumina workflow.

Dataset Information

A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2.

Publications

A comparison of five Illumina, Ion Torrent, and nanopore sequencing technology-based approaches for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets