Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparison of the short- and long-term prognosis of early-onset colorectal cancer compared with later-onset colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Background and aims

The annual incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing at an alarming rate. The prognosis of EOCRC remains controversial, and whether the early onset is a risk factor for colorectal cancer remains unclear.

Methods

We searched four electronic bibliographic databases from database inception to April 25, 2022 for studies that included both early- and later-onset patients and performed a prognostic analysis. Random-effects models were used to summarize the prognostic information extracted by the investigators, including overall survival (OS), cancer-special survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Network meta-analysis (NMA) was used to compare patients' long-term prognoses in different age subgroups.

Results

After 694 reports were screened, 13 studies were included in the final analysis, with a total of 448,781 CRC cases. In the meta-analysis of the 5-year OS, EOCRC had a better prognosis compared to LOCRC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.99; relative risk [RR] 0.83, 95% CI, 0.78-0.89). No difference in prognosis was found between the two groups in terms of 5-year CSS (RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.93-1.05), 5-year DFS (RR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.74-1.09), and short-term OS. In the NMA, patients aged <30 years had the worst outcome (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 15.8%) in 5-year OS; consistent results were observed in the analysis of 5-year CSS (<30 years, SUCRA 4.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Although patients with early-onset CRC had better OS than those with later-onset CRC, there was no difference in the CSS. Meanwhile, the trend for survival was worse in younger patients, especially in those ages 18-29 years. Thus, more attention should be paid to early diagnosis and treatment of EOCRC.

Systematic review and meta‐analysis registration

The systematic review and Meta-analysis protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022334697).

SUBMITTER: Jin T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10259524 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparison of the short- and long-term prognosis of early-onset colorectal cancer compared with later-onset colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jin Taojun T   Li Xinxing X   Ji Jianmei J   Li Jue J   Yin Xiaomao X   Xu Kai K   Wang Wenqiang W   Zhang Wei W   Xu Xiaowen X   Hu Zhiqian Z   Gong Biao B  

Health science reports 20230612 6


<h4>Background and aims</h4>The annual incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) is increasing at an alarming rate. The prognosis of EOCRC remains controversial, and whether the early onset is a risk factor for colorectal cancer remains unclear.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched four electronic bibliographic databases from database inception to April 25, 2022 for studies that included both early- and later-onset patients and performed a prognostic analysis. Random-effects models were used to s  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10065351 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8899385 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6774873 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8047767 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8005726 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8924022 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10881959 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8263633 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8477896 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10648487 | biostudies-literature