Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Generalized phase I-II designs to increase long term therapeutic success rate.


ABSTRACT: Designs for early phase dose finding clinical trials typically are either phase I based on toxicity, or phase I-II based on toxicity and efficacy. These designs rely on the implicit assumption that the dose of an experimental agent chosen using these short-term outcomes will maximize the agent's long-term therapeutic success rate. In many clinical settings, this assumption is not true. A dose selected in an early phase oncology trial may give suboptimal progression-free survival or overall survival time, often due to a high rate of relapse following response. To address this problem, a new family of Bayesian generalized phase I-II designs is proposed. First, a conventional phase I-II design based on short-term outcomes is used to identify a set of candidate doses, rather than selecting one dose. Additional patients then are randomized among the candidates, patients are followed for a predefined longer time period, and a final dose is selected to maximize the long-term therapeutic success rate, defined in terms of duration of response. Dose-specific sample sizes in the randomization are determined adaptively to obtain a desired level of selection reliability. The design was motivated by a phase I-II trial to find an optimal dose of natural killer cells as targeted immunotherapy for recurrent or treatment-resistant B-cell hematologic malignancies. A simulation study shows that, under a range of scenarios in the context of this trial, the proposed design has much better performance than two conventional phase I-II designs.

SUBMITTER: Thall PF 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10524372 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jul-Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Generalized phase I-II designs to increase long term therapeutic success rate.

Thall Peter F PF   Zang Yong Y   Yuan Ying Y  

Pharmaceutical statistics 20230411 4


Designs for early phase dose finding clinical trials typically are either phase I based on toxicity, or phase I-II based on toxicity and efficacy. These designs rely on the implicit assumption that the dose of an experimental agent chosen using these short-term outcomes will maximize the agent's long-term therapeutic success rate. In many clinical settings, this assumption is not true. A dose selected in an early phase oncology trial may give suboptimal progression-free survival or overall survi  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6139598 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3434989 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5226728 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7298772 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3981906 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5138118 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8765730 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3328614 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2374235 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC9906090 | biostudies-literature