Project description:Abstract Introduction Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) are common complications in patients with glioblastoma (GBM). Factor V Leiden (FVL) polymorphism (rs6025, c.1601 G>A) is a known risk factor for VTE, evaluated in cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) in different tumor types. Little is known about the role of this variant in development of CAT in patients with GBM. Material and Methods A cohort of 116 GBM patients (73 males and 43 females) all treated with concomitant temozolomide and radiotherapy, were genotyped for FVL using PCR- pyrosequencing. Of the cohort, 40 patients were diagnosed with and 76 without VTE. Allele frequencies of respective variant were also compared with data from the SweGen Variant Frequency Browser (https://swegen-exac.nbis.se/). Statistical analyses in regard to VTE and its association with FVL and prognostic factors were performed. Results The variant A/G of FVL was carried by 17 (15%) of the patients and 99 (85%) were wild type, G/G. Chi2 test including the prognostic factors age, type of surgery, gender and blood group showed that these were evenly distributed between those with G/G and A/G, except for blood group in relation to FVL variant, which showed a borderline significance (p=0.07). Among the patients having blood group 0, 32% (n= 32) were G/G and 59% (n= 10) were A/G. Statistical tests did not reveal any correlation between blood group and FVL variant. In the logistic regression analysis apart from FVL, age, gender and blood group were included. This showed a significant difference for blood group 0 versus non-0 (A, B or AB) for decreased risk of VTE (P=0.014). There was no significant difference between heterozygous FVL (A/G) versus the G/G genotype in VTE risk (p=0.09). There were no differences in survival in relation to VTE or not or variant of FVL. The FVL AG variant is slightly overrepresented among GBM compared to the normal Swedish population, but does not reach statistical significance, OR 1.63 (0.93–2.84). Conclusions We examined the influence of FVL variants together with clinical factors in a homogenously treated cohort of GBM patients for the risk to develop a VTE. We confirmed blood group 0 versus non-0 as reducing the VTE risk. For FVL c.1601 G>A variant, the differences between AG vs GG did not reach statistical significance. In our cohort we found a trend towards increased risk of developing GBM for the A/G variant. We plan to further study other factors involved in coagulation for their potential role in GBM patients.
Project description:AbstractSickle cell trait (SCT) is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Prior studies investigating the association between SCT and VTE have been performed nearly exclusively in Black populations. However, race-based research can contribute to systemic racism in medicine. We leveraged data from the 23andMe research cohort (4 184 082 participants) to calculate the ancestry-independent risk of VTE associated with SCT as well as comparative risk estimates for heterozygous factor V Leiden (FVL). Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a meta-analysis of 3 genetic ancestry groups (European [n = 3 183 142], Latine [n = 597 539], and African [n = 202 281]) and a secondary full-cohort analysis including 2 additional groups (East Asian [n = 159 863] and South Asian [n = 41 257]). Among the full cohort, 94 323 participants (2.25%) reported a history of VTE. On meta-analysis, individuals with SCT had a 1.45-fold (confidence interval [CI], 1.32-1.60) increased risk of VTE compared with SCT noncarriers, which was similar to the full-cohort estimate. The risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) in SCT (OR, 1.95; CI, 1.72-2.20) was higher than that of isolated deep venous thrombosis (DVT; OR, 1.04; CI, 0.90-1.21). FVL carriers had 3.30-fold (CI, 3.24-3.37) increased risk of VTE compared with FVL noncarriers, with a higher risk of isolated DVT (OR, 3.59; CI, 3.51-3.68) than PE (OR, 2.72; CI, 2.64-2.81). In this large, diverse cohort, the risk of VTE was increased among individuals with SCT compared with those without, independent of race or genetic ancestry. The risk of VTE with SCT was lower than that observed in FVL; however, the pattern of VTE in SCT was PE predominant, which is the opposite to that observed in FVL.
Project description:BackgroundABO blood type locus has been reported to be an important genetic determinant of venous and arterial thrombosis in genome-wide association studies. We tested the hypothesis that ABO blood type alone and in combination with mutations in factor V Leiden R506Q and prothrombin G20210A is associated with the risk of venous thromboembolism and myocardial infarction in the general population.MethodsWe used data from 2 Danish studies that followed members of the general public from 1977 through 2010. We obtained the genotype of 66 001 white participants for ABO blood type, factor V Leiden R506Q and prothrombin G20210A. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) and population attributable risk. Our main outcome measures were venous thromboembolism and myocardial infarction.ResultsThe multivariable adjusted HR for venous thromboembolism was 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-1.5) for non-O blood type (v. O blood type). For the factor V Leiden R506Q mutation, the adjusted HR was 2.2 (95% CI 2.0-2.5) for heterozygous participants and 7.0 (95%CI 4.8-10) for homozygous participants (v. participants without the mutation). For prothrombin G20210A, the adjusted HR was 1.5 (95%CI 1.2-1.9) for heterozygous participants and 11 (95% CI 2.8-44) for homozygous participants (v. participants without the mutation). When we combined ABO blood type and factor V Leiden R506Q or prothrombin G20210A genotype, there was a stepwise increase in the risk of venous thromboembolism (trend, p<0.001). The population attributable risk of venous thromboembolism was 20% for ABO blood type, 10% for factor V Leiden R506Q and 1% for prothrombin G20210A. Multivariable adjusted HRs for myocardial infarction by genotypes did not differ from 1.0.InterpretationABO blood type had an additive effect on the risk of venous thromboembolism when combined with factor V Leiden R506Q and prothrombin G20210A mutations; blood type was the most important risk factor for venous thromboembolism in the general population.
Project description:BackgroundThrombophilia screening is widely done in clinical practice, and it is claimed that the extent of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence risk in patients with common defects is still not fully understood.AimWe aimed to summarize data of all observational studies prospectively assessing the association of heterozygous factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation and recurrent VTE in patients with VTE, and to calculate pooled relative risks (RR), overall and in various subgroups.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for cohort studies prospectively assessing VTE recurrence in patients with and without FVL mutation (PROSPERO: CRD42021182800). Data were extracted on cohort and study-level. The methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RR were calculated overall and in subgroups using a random-effects model.ResultsFrom 31 cohorts, 24 studies were finally included summarizing 13,571 patients. Heterozygous FVL mutation was identified in 2,840 individuals (21%). The methodological quality was estimated to be high in 20 studies (83%). The overall RR was 1.46 (95% CI: 1.31, 1.64), consistent across subgroups.ConclusionsPooling all high-quality epidemiological data, the risk of recurrent VTE was increased by 46% in patients with heterozygous FVL mutation. Against the background of established risk factors, the FVL mutation plays only a marginal role in the risk assessment for recurrent VTE.
Project description:Understanding the genetic basis of routinely-acquired blood tests can provide insights into several aspects of human physiology. We report a genome-wide association study of 42 quantitative blood test traits defined using Electronic Healthcare Records (EHRs) of ~50,000 British Bangladeshi and British Pakistani adults. We demonstrate a causal variant within the PIEZO1 locus which was associated with alterations in red cell traits and glycated haemoglobin. Conditional analysis and within-ancestry fine mapping confirmed that this signal is driven by a missense variant - chr16-88716656-G-TT - which is common in South Asian ancestries (MAF 3.9%) but ultra-rare in other ancestries. Carriers of the T allele had lower mean HbA1c values, lower HbA1c values for a given level of random or fasting glucose, and delayed diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Our results shed light on the genetic basis of clinically-relevant traits in an under-represented population, and emphasise the importance of ancestral diversity in genetic studies.
Project description:Routine prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Asian IBD patients has been controversial. We aimed to estimate the risk of VTE of Asian patients at different phases of IBD by incorporating patient-specific risk factors. In this cohort study, we analyzed the National Health Insurance claims data between 2012 and 2016 for the entire Korean population. We calculated incidence rates and hazard ratios for VTE. The overall VTE risk was higher in patients with IBD [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 2.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.66-2.55], than in controls. When we compare the risk of VTE by different disease phases, the risk of VTE was the highest during post-operation period after IBD-related bowel surgery (aHR, 39.7; 95% CI 9.87-159.3), followed by during hospitalized periods with flare (aHR, 27.2; 95% CI 14.9-49.65) and during hospitalized periods with non-flare (aHR, 16.23; 95% CI 10.71-24.58). The incidence rate (per 1000 person-years) was 15.26 during hospitalized periods with a flare and 9.83 during hospitalized periods with non-flare. According to age groups, the incidence rate (per 1000 person-years) during hospitalized periods with flare was 14.53 in young patients (20-39 years) and 34.58 in older patients (60-80 years). During hospitalized periods with non-flare, the incidence rate was 3.55 in young patients and 23.61 in older patients. The prophylaxis of VTE for Asian patients with IBD should be recommended in older patients admitted to hospital and be considered in young patients who are hospitalized with a flare.
Project description:A limited number of studies investigated the association between the ABO blood groups and the incidence of venous thromboembolism in individuals with Factor V Leiden; however, discordant findings were reported. Consequently, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the existing evidence on the susceptibility of the ABO blood group to venous thromboembolism in individuals with Factor V Leiden. All English-published articles on the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were comprehensively and systematically searched by the author without a time or region limit. Four studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis after the removal of studies that were not eligible. According to the analyses of the fixed and random effects, the point estimates of the effect size and the 95% confidence interval were 0.416 (95% CI: 0.397-0.435) and 0.392 (95% CI: 0.288-0.507), respectively. In contrast, the homogeneity test (Q value) reveals that blood group data distributions have a heterogenous structure (Q = 432.187; p-value < 0.001). The pooled event rates and the 95% CIs for the A, AB, B, and O-blood groups were 0.518 (95% CI: 0.411-0.622), 0.592 (95% CI: 0.495-0.683), 0.205 (95% CI: 0.041-0.612), and 0.283 (95% CI: 0.247-0.322), respectively. According to the findings, people with Factor V Leiden with blood group AB are more likely to develop venous thromboembolism than those with blood groups A, O, and B. The overall statistical significance of the ABO blood group's susceptibility to venous thromboembolism in individuals with Factor V Leiden was <0.001 (pooled p-value). In conclusion, the current meta-analysis provides an additional indication that blood group AB individuals with Factor V Leiden are at higher risk of developing venous thromboembolism, and blood type B is connected to a lower risk of developing venous thromboembolism.
Project description:BackgroundA high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in COVID-19 has led to international recommendations for thromboprophylaxis. With limited data on Asian patients with COVID-19, the role of thromboprophylaxis remains unclear.ObjectivesTo investigate the in-hospital incidence of VTE in an Asian COVID-19 cohort, describe the VTE trend through successive COVID-19 waves (wild-type, delta, and omicron), and characterize the risk factors for VTE.MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational cohort study of hospitalized COVID-19 adults from January 2020 to February 2022. Objectively confirmed VTE were reviewed to obtain VTE incidence and trend. Subset analysis of critical (intensive care), moderate (oxygen supplementation), and mild cases hospitalized ≥5 days was performed to investigate risk factors and in-hospital hazards of VTE.ResultsSixteen VTE events occurred among 3574 patients. Overall, VTE incidence was 0.45%, or 0.21% in mild, 3.60% in moderate, and 5.38% in critical infection. The maximum cumulative risk of VTE was 1.14% at 14 days for mild, 8.13% at 21 days for moderate, and 11.55% at 35 days for critical infection. Thromboprophylaxis use in mild, moderate, and critical cases was 5.7%, 28.8%, and 81.7%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the severity of infection remained the strongest independent predictor of VTE. Compared with mild infection, the relative risk was 8.26 (95% CI, 2.26-30.16) for critical infection and 6.29 (95% CI, 1.54-25.67) for moderate infection.ConclusionOverall, VTE incidence in Asian patients with COVID-19 is <1% across successive waves. Patients with moderate and critical infections are at greater risk for VTE and should be considered for routine thromboprophylaxis.
Project description:BackgroundReported association between statin use and cataract risk is controversial. The SLCO1B1 gene encodes a transport protein responsible for statin clearance. The aim of this study was to investigate a possible association between the SLCO1B1*5 reduced function variant and cataract risk in statin users of South Asian ethnicity.MethodsThe Genes & Health cohort consists of British-Bangladeshi and British-Pakistani participants from East London, Manchester and Bradford, UK. SLCO1B1*5 genotype was assessed with the Illumina GSAMD-24v3-0-EA chip. Medication data from primary care health record linkage was used to compare those who had regularly used statins compared to those who had not. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test for association between statin use and cataracts, adjusting for population characteristics and potential confounders in 36,513 participants. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test association between SLCO1B1*5 heterozygotes or homozygotes and cataracts, in subgroups having been regularly prescribed statins versus not.ResultsStatins were prescribed to 35% (12,704) of participants (average age 41 years old, 45% male). Non-senile cataract was diagnosed in 5% (1686) of participants. An apparent association between statins and non-senile cataract (12% in statin users and 0.8% in non-statin users) was negated by inclusion of confounders. In those prescribed a statin, presence of the SLCO1B1*5 genotype was independently associated with a decreased risk of non-senile cataract (OR 0.7 (CI 0.5-0.9, p 0.007)).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that there is no independent association between statin use and non-senile cataract risk after adjusting for confounders. Among statin users, the SLCO1B1*5 genotype is associated with a 30% risk reduction of non-senile cataracts. Stratification of on-drug cohorts by validated pharmacogenomic variants is a useful tool to support or repudiate adverse drug events in observational cohorts.
Project description:IntroductionPatients with a first venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of recurrence. Recurrent VTE (rVTE) can be prevented by extended anticoagulant therapy, but this comes at the cost of an increased risk of bleeding. It is still uncertain whether patients with an intermediate recurrence risk or with a high recurrence and high bleeding risk will benefit from extended anticoagulant treatment, and whether a strategy where anticoagulant duration is tailored on the predicted risks of rVTE and bleeding can improve outcomes. The aim of the Leiden Thrombosis Recurrence Risk Prevention (L-TRRiP) study is to evaluate the outcomes of tailored duration of long-term anticoagulant treatment based on individualised assessment of rVTE and major bleeding risks.Methods and analysisThe L-TRRiP study is a multicentre, open-label, cohort-based, randomised controlled trial, including patients with a first VTE. We classify the risk of rVTE and major bleeding using the L-TRRiP and VTE-BLEED scores, respectively. After 3 months of anticoagulant therapy, patients with a low rVTE risk will discontinue anticoagulant treatment, patients with a high rVTE and low bleeding risk will continue anticoagulant treatment, whereas all other patients will be randomised to continue or discontinue anticoagulant treatment. All patients will be followed up for at least 2 years. Inclusion will continue until the randomised group consists of 608 patients; we estimate to include 1600 patients in total. The primary outcome is the combined incidence of rVTE and major bleeding in the randomised group after 2 years of follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of rVTE and major bleeding, functional outcomes, quality of life and cost-effectiveness in all patients.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden-Den Haag-Delft. Results are expected in 2028 and will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and during (inter)national conferences.Trial registration numberNCT06087952.