Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Normative Modeling of Brain Morphometry in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.


ABSTRACT:

Importance

The lack of robust neuroanatomical markers of psychosis risk has been traditionally attributed to heterogeneity. A complementary hypothesis is that variation in neuroanatomical measures in individuals at psychosis risk may be nested within the range observed in healthy individuals.

Objective

To quantify deviations from the normative range of neuroanatomical variation in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) and evaluate their overlap with healthy variation and their association with positive symptoms, cognition, and conversion to a psychotic disorder.

Design, setting, and participants

This case-control study used clinical-, IQ-, and neuroimaging software (FreeSurfer)-derived regional measures of cortical thickness (CT), cortical surface area (SA), and subcortical volume (SV) from 1340 individuals with CHR-P and 1237 healthy individuals pooled from 29 international sites participating in the Enhancing Neuroimaging Genetics Through Meta-analysis (ENIGMA) Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Working Group. Healthy individuals and individuals with CHR-P were matched on age and sex within each recruitment site. Data were analyzed between September 1, 2021, and November 30, 2022.

Main outcomes and measures

For each regional morphometric measure, deviation scores were computed as z scores indexing the degree of deviation from their normative means from a healthy reference population. Average deviation scores (ADS) were also calculated for regional CT, SA, and SV measures and globally across all measures. Regression analyses quantified the association of deviation scores with clinical severity and cognition, and 2-proportion z tests identified case-control differences in the proportion of individuals with infranormal (z < -1.96) or supranormal (z > 1.96) scores.

Results

Among 1340 individuals with CHR-P, 709 (52.91%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 20.75 (4.74) years. Among 1237 healthy individuals, 684 (55.30%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 22.32 (4.95) years. Individuals with CHR-P and healthy individuals overlapped in the distributions of the observed values, regional z scores, and all ADS values. For any given region, the proportion of individuals with CHR-P who had infranormal or supranormal values was low (up to 153 individuals [<11.42%]) and similar to that of healthy individuals (<115 individuals [<9.30%]). Individuals with CHR-P who converted to a psychotic disorder had a higher percentage of infranormal values in temporal regions compared with those who did not convert (7.01% vs 1.38%) and healthy individuals (5.10% vs 0.89%). In the CHR-P group, only the ADS SA was associated with positive symptoms (β = -0.08; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.02; P = .02 for false discovery rate) and IQ (β = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02-0.15; P = .02 for false discovery rate).

Conclusions and relevance

In this case-control study, findings suggest that macroscale neuromorphometric measures may not provide an adequate explanation of psychosis risk.

SUBMITTER: ENIGMA Clinical High Risk for Psychosis Working Group 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10568447 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Normative Modeling of Brain Morphometry in Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

Haas Shalaila S SS   Ge Ruiyang R   Agartz Ingrid I   Amminger G Paul GP   Andreassen Ole A OA   Bachman Peter P   Baeza Inmaculada I   Choi Sunah S   Colibazzi Tiziano T   Cropley Vanessa L VL   de la Fuente-Sandoval Camilo C   Ebdrup Bjørn H BH   Fortea Adriana A   Fusar-Poli Paolo P   Glenthøj Birte Yding BY   Glenthøj Louise Birkedal LB   Haut Kristen M KM   Hayes Rebecca A RA   Heekeren Karsten K   Hooker Christine I CI   Hwang Wu Jeong WJ   Jahanshad Neda N   Kaess Michael M   Kasai Kiyoto K   Katagiri Naoyuki N   Kim Minah M   Kindler Jochen J   Koike Shinsuke S   Kristensen Tina D TD   Kwon Jun Soo JS   Lawrie Stephen M SM   Lebedeva Irina I   Lee Jimmy J   Lemmers-Jansen Imke L J ILJ   Lin Ashleigh A   Ma Xiaoqian X   Mathalon Daniel H DH   McGuire Philip P   Michel Chantal C   Mizrahi Romina R   Mizuno Masafumi M   Møller Paul P   Mora-Durán Ricardo R   Nelson Barnaby B   Nemoto Takahiro T   Nordentoft Merete M   Nordholm Dorte D   Omelchenko Maria A MA   Pantelis Christos C   Pariente Jose C JC   Raghava Jayachandra M JM   Reyes-Madrigal Francisco F   Røssberg Jan I JI   Rössler Wulf W   Salisbury Dean F DF   Sasabayashi Daiki D   Schall Ulrich U   Smigielski Lukasz L   Sugranyes Gisela G   Suzuki Michio M   Takahashi Tsutomu T   Tamnes Christian K CK   Theodoridou Anastasia A   Thomopoulos Sophia I SI   Thompson Paul M PM   Tomyshev Alexander S AS   Uhlhaas Peter J PJ   Værnes Tor G TG   van Amelsvoort Therese A M J TAMJ   van Erp Theo G M TGM   Waltz James A JA   Wenneberg Christina C   Westlye Lars T LT   Wood Stephen J SJ   Zhou Juan H JH   Hernaus Dennis D   Jalbrzikowski Maria M   Kahn René S RS   Corcoran Cheryl M CM   Frangou Sophia S  

JAMA psychiatry 20240101 1


<h4>Importance</h4>The lack of robust neuroanatomical markers of psychosis risk has been traditionally attributed to heterogeneity. A complementary hypothesis is that variation in neuroanatomical measures in individuals at psychosis risk may be nested within the range observed in healthy individuals.<h4>Objective</h4>To quantify deviations from the normative range of neuroanatomical variation in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P) and evaluate their overlap with healthy varia  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9882206 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7615822 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11838943 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC12621655 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9616363 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10398543 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9606602 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11875072 | biostudies-literature