Dataset Information

Xenophagy as a Strategy for Mycobacterium leprae Elimination during Type 1 or Type 2 Leprosy Reactions: A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Mycobacterium leprae is an intracellular bacillus that causes leprosy, a neglected disease that affects macrophages and Schwann cells. Leprosy reactions are acute inflammatory responses to mycobacterial antigens, classified as type1 (T1R), a predominant cellular immune response, or type2 (T2R), a humoral phenomenon, leading to a high number of bacilli in infected cells and nerve structures. Xenophagy is a type of selective autophagy that targets intracellular bacteria for lysosomal degradation; however, its immune mechanisms during leprosy reactions are still unclear. This review summarizes the relationship between the autophagic process and M. leprae elimination during leprosy reactions.

Methods

Three databases, PubMed/Medline (n = 91), Scopus (n = 73), and ScienceDirect (n = 124), were searched. After applying the eligibility criteria, articles were selected for independent peer reviewers in August 2023.

Results

From a total of 288 studies retrieved, eight were included. In multibacillary (MB) patients who progressed to T1R, xenophagy blockade and increased inflammasome activation were observed, with IL-1β secretion before the reactional episode occurrence. On the other hand, recent data actually observed increased IL-15 levels before the reaction began, as well as IFN-γ production and xenophagy induction.

Conclusion

Our search results showed a dichotomy in the T1R development and their relationship with xenophagy. No T2R studies were found.

SUBMITTER: Cerqueira DDN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC10747110 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Xenophagy as a Strategy for <i>Mycobacterium leprae</i> Elimination during Type 1 or Type 2 Leprosy Reactions: A Systematic Review.

Cerqueira Débora Dantas Nucci DDN Pereira Ana Letícia Silva ALS da Costa Ana Elisa Coelho AEC de Souza Tarcísio Joaquim TJ de Sousa Fernandes Matheus Santos MS Souto Fabrício Oliveira FO Santos Patrícia d'Emery Alves PDA

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) 20231215 12

<h4>Background</h4><i>Mycobacterium leprae</i> is an intracellular bacillus that causes leprosy, a neglected disease that affects macrophages and Schwann cells. Leprosy reactions are acute inflammatory responses to mycobacterial antigens, classified as type1 (T1R), a predominant cellular immune response, or type2 (T2R), a humoral phenomenon, leading to a high number of bacilli in infected cells and nerve structures. Xenophagy is a type of selective autophagy that targets intracellular bacteria f ...[more]

PMID: 38133338

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Reactions in Leprosy are immune exacerbations that cause debilitating consequences like nerve damage and permanent deformities. Prediction of these reactional states using appropriate biomarkers would enable early treatment interventions to prevent nerve function impairment. The current study investigated whole transcriptomic expression profiles of Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) that differentiate leprosy cases in type 2 (Erythema Nodosum Leprosum) reactions with those without reactions in host skin tissue derived RNA. Methods: Post clinical examination, excisional skin biopsy specimens were collected from skin lesions of subjects with and without type 2 reaction. Total RNA was extracted following the Trizol protocol and bacterial RNA was enriched in the samples. A 2 x 400K gene expression array (whole genome tiling array) was designed with the probes having 60-mer oligonucleotides tiling every 10bp of the genome sequence of M. leprae (NC_011896.1). The array comprised 420288 features which include probes and Agilent controls. The quality of RNA was estimated using BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies) followed by labelling, reverse transcription, amplification and hybridization to the arrays. The hybridized slides were scanned on a G2600D scanner (Agilent Technologies). The data thus acquired is analysed using GeneSpring GX Version 12.1 software. Data was normalized and fold difference in expression was noted from 359,922 probes which include sense and antisense orientations of 179,961 probes. The differentially expressing M. leprae genomic regions between type 2 reactions and non reactional cases were noted. Results: Considering a statistical cut-off value of 0.6 for fold difference in expression between the test and the control samples, a set of 107 genes indicated statistically significant up-regulation with volcano plot p-values less than 0.05. Functional characterization revealed higher-expression of genes encoding transmembrane proteins (12), regulatory proteins (9), fatty acid biosynthesis (6), amino acid metabolism (13), nucleic acid metabolism (7), DNA replication and repair (7), Secretory proteins (2) Krebs Cycle (1), Glycolysis (1), Drug Efflux Protein (1),Stress Response Protein (1), Energy Metabolism (2), Pantothenate biosynthesis (1), Metalloproteins (3), Hydrolases (1) and Hypothetical Proteins (40). Additionally there are 157 genes that are down regulated in cases with reaction. Conclusion: Differential expression of genes in the human skin biopsy specimens among leprosy cases with type 2 reaction in contrast to those without reaction suggests the role of pathogen associated gene expression triggers with the aetiology of these reactions. As most of the transmembrane and cell wall proteins possess epitope and surface exposed domains, higher expression levels of genes encoding these proteins may have a possible role in enhancing host immune responses characteristic of type 2 reactions in leprosy.

Project description:BackgroundLeprosy is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae. As incidence begins to decline, the characteristics of new cases shifts away from those observed in highly endemic areas, revealing potentially important insights into possible ongoing sources of transmission. We aimed to investigate whether transmission is driven mainly by undiagnosed and untreated new leprosy cases in the community, or by incompletely treated or relapsing cases.Methodology/principal findingsA literature search of major electronic databases was conducted in January, 2020 with 134 articles retained out of a total 4318 records identified (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020178923). We presented quantitative data from leprosy case records with supporting evidence describing the decline in incidence across several contexts. BCG vaccination, active case finding, adherence to multidrug therapy and continued surveillance following treatment were the main strategies shared by countries who achieved a substantial reduction in incidence. From 3950 leprosy case records collected across 22 low endemic countries, 48.3% were suspected to be imported, originating from transmission outside of the country. Most cases were multibacillary (64.4%) and regularly confirmed through skin biopsy, with 122 cases of suspected relapse from previous leprosy treatment. Family history was reported in 18.7% of cases, while other suspected sources included travel to high endemic areas and direct contact with armadillos. None of the countries included in the analysis reported a distinct increase in leprosy incidence in recent years.Conclusions/significanceTogether with socioeconomic improvement over time, several successful leprosy control programmes have been implemented in recent decades that led to a substantial decline in incidence. Most cases described in these contexts were multibacillary and numerous cases of suspected relapse were reported. Despite these observations, there was no indication that these cases led to a rise in new secondary cases, suggesting that they do not represent a large ongoing source of human-to-human transmission.

Project description:BackgroundLeprosy reactions, reversal reactions/RR and erythema nodosum leprosum/ENL, can cause irreversible nerve damage, handicaps and deformities. The study of Mycobacterium leprae-specific serologic responses at diagnosis in the cohort of patients enrolled at the Clinical Trial for Uniform Multidrug Therapy Regimen for Leprosy Patients in Brazil/U-MDT/CT-BR is suitable to evaluate its prognostic value for the development of reactions.MethodologyIgM and IgG antibody responses to PGL-I, LID-1, ND-O-LID were evaluated by ELISA in 452 reaction-free leprosy patients at diagnosis, enrolled and monitored for the development of leprosy reactions during a total person-time of 780,930 person-days, i.e. 2139.5 person-years, with a maximum of 6.66 years follow-up time.Principal findingsAmong these patients, 36% (160/452) developed reactions during follow-up: 26% (119/452) RR and 10% (41/452) had ENL. At baseline higher anti-PGL-I, anti-LID-1 and anti-ND-O-LID seropositivity rates were seen in patients who developed ENL and RR compared to reaction-free patients (p<0.0001). Seroreactivity in reactional and reaction-free patients was stratified by bacilloscopic index/BI categories. Among BI negative patients, higher anti-PGL-I levels were seen in RR compared to reaction-free patients (p = 0.014). In patients with 0<BI<3, (36 RR, 36 reaction-free), higher antibody levels to PGL-I (p = 0.014) and to LID-1 (p = 0.035) were seen in RR while difference in anti-ND-O-LID positivity was borderline (p = 0.052). Patients with BI≥3 that developed ENL had higher levels of anti-LID-1 antibodies (p = 0.028) compared to reaction-free patients. Anti-PGL-I serology had a limited predictive value for RR according to receiver operating curve/ROC analyses (area-under-the-curve/AUC = 0.7). Anti LID-1 serology at baseline showed the best performance to predict ENL (AUC 0.85).ConclusionsOverall, detection of anti-PGL-I, anti-LID-1 and anti-ND-O-LID antibodies at diagnosis, showed low sensitivity and specificity for RR prediction, indicating low applicability of serological tests for RR prognosis. On the other hand, anti-LID-1 serology at diagnosis has shown prognostic value for ENL development in BI positive patients.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00669643.

Project description:BackgroundDetection of infection with Mycobacterium leprae allows timely prophylactic treatment, thereby reducing transmission as well as the risk of permanent, leprosy-associated nerve damage. However, since there is no worldwide-implemented standard test for M. leprae infection, detection of infection in asymptomatic individuals remains a major challenge for control programs in endemic areas. In previous studies, we developed and field-tested a lateral flow assay (LFA) quantitatively detecting human IgM against M. leprae-specific phenolic glycolipid I (anti-PGL-I), a marker for both active and past infection. This rapid test utilizes luminescent, background-free, up-converting reporter particles (UCP) and immunochromatography (i.e. the UCP-LF test platform) for accurate quantitation of anti-PGL-I IgM without operator bias. The aim of this study was to evaluate the final version of this quantitative UCP-based rapid test (i.e. PGL-I QURapid), using serum and fingerstick blood (FSB).MethodsThe test comprises a lateral flow strip, in a standard plastic or biodegradable cassette. It can be provided with a humanized, recombinant control to monitor test performance and calculate accurate anti-PGL-I IgM levels. The performance of this QUR-test was assessed using serum and FSB from patients with leprosy (n = 214), tuberculosis (n = 20), buruli ulcer (n = 19), leishmaniasis (n = 14), non-tuberculous mycobacterial (n = 35) infections, as well as healthy Dutch individuals (n = 710) and humanized, recombinant anti-PGL-I IgM antibodies. Plot receiver operating characteristic curves were created and sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp) and the area under the curve were calculated to evaluate test performance.ResultsTest results classified multibacillary leprosy patients with 95.0% Sn and 100% Sp using serum and 91.5% Sn and 99.8% Sp using FSB. Qualitative test results could be read after 2 min flow time, with accurate quantitation from 10 min onwards. The new anti-PGL-I IgM control supports production of batches with predetermined seropositivity thresholds and monitoring of the PGL-I QUR-test in various settings.ConclusionThe operational version of the PGL-I QURapid with point-of-care applicability, meets the WHO target product profile criteria. Thus, this QUR-test is ready for public health implementations.