Using four-point subcutaneous injection of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound to diagnose lymphedema of lower extremity
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Li J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC11250299 | biostudies-literature | 2024 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background Lymphedema is an accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial spaces resulting from impairment in the lymphatic circulation that can impair quality of life and cause considerable morbidity. Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) has an overall incidence rate of 20%. Conservative therapies are the first step in treatment of LEL; however, they do not provide a cure because they fail to address the underlying physiologic dysfunction of the lymphatic system. Among several surgical alternatives, lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) has gained popularity due to its improved outcomes and less invasive approach. This study aims to review the published literature on LVA for LEL treatment and to analyze the surgical outcomes. Methods PubMed database was used to perform a comprehensive literature review of all articles describing LVA for treatment of LEL from Novemeber 1985 to June 2019. Search terms included "lymphovenous" OR "lymphaticovenous" AND "bypass" OR "anastomosis" OR "shunt" AND "lower extremity lymphedema." Results A total of 95 articles were identified in the initial query, out of which 58 individual articles were deemed eligible. The studies included in this review describe notable variations in surgical techniques, number of anastomoses, and supplementary interventions. All, except one study, reported positive outcomes based on limb circumference and volume changes or subjective clinical improvement. The largest reduction rate in limb circumference and volume was 63.8%. Conclusion LVA demonstrated a considerable reduction in limb volume and improvement in subjective findings of lymphedema in the majority of patients. The maintained effectiveness of this treatment modality in long-term follow-up suggests great efficacy of LVA in LEL treatment.
| S-EPMC7192660 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAn immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) combining axillary reverse lymphatic mapping (ARLM) and lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) has been gradually in the spotlight as a novel surgical technique to prevent lymphedema. In this study, we investigate the preventive effect of ILR for the risk of upper extremity lymphedema. We will compare the incidence of postoperative lymphedema between the ILR treatment group and the no-try or failure group during the same period with analysis of the effects of different variables.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 213 patients who had undergone mastectomy for node-positive unilateral breast cancer in our institution between November 1, 2019 and February 28, 2021. To assess the effect of preventive ILR, we divided the patients into a treatment group (n=30) and a control group (n=183). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the association between ILR and lymphedema occurrence.ResultsOf the 30 patients who were attempted, we successfully performed ILRs in 26 patients (86.7%). During a mean follow-up of 14 months, one patient (3.8%) was confirmed to have upper extremity lymphedema in the treatment group, whereas 14 out of 183 patients (7.7%) were diagnosed in the control group. In multivariate analysis, ILR success showed a borderline significant decrease in risk of lymphedema [hazard ratio (HR) =0.174; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.022-1.374; P=0.097].ConclusionsOur results suggested that ILR may be a promising surgical treatment to prevent postoperative lymphedema. There is a need for larger studies with longer follow-up to confirm the findings obtained in our study.
| S-EPMC10086774 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is a microsurgical treatment for lymphedema of the lower extremity (LEL). This study systematically reviews the most recent data on outcomes of various LVA techniques for LEL in diverse patients.MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Scopus databases to extract articles published through June 2021. Studies reporting data on objective postoperative improvement in lymphedema and/or subjective improvement in quality of life for patients with LEL were included. Extracted data comprised demographics, number of patients and lower limbs, duration of symptoms before LVA, surgical technique, duration of follow-up, and objective and subjective outcomes.ResultsA total of 303 articles were identified and evaluated, of which 74 were ultimately deemed eligible for inclusion in this study, representing 6260 patients and 2554 lower limbs. The average patient age ranged from 22.6 to 76.14 years. The duration of lymphedema before LVA ranged from 12 months to 11.4 years. Objective rates of improvement in lymphedema ranged from 23.3% to 100%, with the greatest degree of improvement seen in patients with early-stage LEL.ConclusionsLVA is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of LEL of all stages. Several emerging techniques and variations may lead to improved patient outcomes.
| S-EPMC9542573 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Post traumatic lymphedema (PTL) is a known complication of extremity trauma that is detrimental to limb form and function, healing, and quality of life. In cases of complex lower extremity trauma with vascular and extensive soft tissue injury, the risk of PTL is increased. However, many trauma patients are lost to follow-up, making the risk and potential management of these patients' lymphedema difficult to characterize. The purpose of this report is to describe the successful surgical management of PTL secondary to significant lower extremity trauma requiring complex limb salvage reconstruction. A 43-year-old woman involved in a motorcycle accident presented with a Gustilo IIIB right tibial fracture and single-vessel leg. She underwent successful limb salvage with serial debridement, bony fixation, creation of an arteriovenous loop with a contralateral saphenous vein graft, and a chimeric latissimus dorsi-serratus anterior muscle flap. At the 5-month follow-up, she presented with significant right lower extremity lymphedema. She underwent lymphovenous bypass surgery guided by preoperative indocyanine green lymphography, which resulted in a 62% improvement in functional outcome measures, eliminated her prior need for compression garments and inability to wear regular shoes, and sustained improvement at two years follow-up. This case illustrates a near circumferential traumatic defect reconstructed with a muscle flap and successful delayed lymphatic reconstruction with lymphovenous bypass in the same patient.
| S-EPMC11444531 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is targeted at preventing breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) by anastomosing disrupted arm lymphatic channels to axillary vein tributaries. Inadequate vein length and venous back-bleeding are two technical reasons that lead to ILR procedures being aborted intraoperatively. Recently, our team began routinely harvesting a lower extremity vein graft (LEVG) for all ILR procedures to reduce our abort rate. We describe the surgical approach of an LEVG and evaluate the effects on aborted case rates and intraoperative time. A retrospective review of our institutional lymphatic database was conducted. Two hundred and forty-seven breast cancer patients were taken to the operating room for attempted ILR in the past 5 years. Prior to the use of an LEVG (n = 205), our abort rate was 14%. Since routinely performing an LEVG with ILR (n = 42), we have not aborted a single case. Despite an LEVG requiring one additional anastomosis to connect the vein graft to the native axillary vein tributary, this technique has not changed the intraoperative time for ILR procedures. In this technical contribution, we describe our early experience performing immediate lymphatic reconstruction utilizing a lower extremity vein graft. Implementation of this technique appears to have promising effects on aborted case rates without affecting intraoperative time, and greatly facilitates the lymphovenous anastomosis.
| S-EPMC9707267 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveLower extremity lymphedema (LEL) is a well-known adverse effect related to cervical and endometrial cancer (CEC); however, very few studies have elucidated the clinicopathologic risk factors related to LEL. We investigated the incidence and risk factors in patients who received primary surgery and/or adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or chemotherapy for CEC.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 2,565 patients who underwent primary surgery following CEC diagnosis between January 2007 and December 2020. LEL diagnosis was based on objective and subjective assessments by experts. We identified important predictors of LEL to construct a nomogram predicting individual risks of LEL. For internal validation of the nomogram, the original data were separated using the split-sample method in a 7:3 ratio of training data and test data.ResultsOverall, 858 patients (33.5%) received RT, 586 received external beam RT (EBRT), and 630 received intracavitary RT. During follow-up period, LEL developed in 331 patients, with an overall cumulative 5-year incidence of 13.3%. In multivariate analysis, age at primary treatment, use of docetaxel-based chemotherapy, type of hysterectomy, type of surgical pelvic lymph node (LN) assessment, number of dissected pelvic and para-aortic LNs, and EBRT field were the independent predictors of LEL. We subsequently developed the nomogram showing excellent predictive power for LEL.ConclusionLEL is associated with various treatment modalities, and their interactions may increase the possibility of occurrences. De-escalation strategies for treatment modalities should be considered to reduce LEL in patients with CEC.
| S-EPMC10157345 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background The staging of primary lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) is difficult yet vital in clinical work, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used for quantitative assessment of primary LEL due to its high resolution for soft tissues. In this study, we evaluated the value of MRI-based soft tissue area measurements for staging primary LEL. Methods A total of 90 consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed primary lower limb lymphoedema from January 2017 to December 2019 in Beijing Shijitan Hospital were enrolled retrospectively. Short time inversion recovery (STIR) sequence was applied to measure the total, muscle, bone, and subcutaneous areas in the upper 1/3 level of the bilateral lower calf. The difference between the affected and unaffected calf regarding the subcutaneous area was obtained, and (subcutaneous area)/(bone area) and (subcutaneous area)/(muscle area) were calculated. According to the International Society of Lymphology (ISL) clinical staging standard established in 2020, all patients were divided into stages I, II, and III, accordingly. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the validity of MRI measurements in staging LEL. Results There were 33 patients classified as stage I clinically, 44 patients as stage II, and 13 patients as stage III. There were significant differences in total, subcutaneous, the difference in subcutaneous area of limbs, subcutaneous/bone (S/B), and subcutaneous/muscle (S/M) between stage I and II as well as between stage I and III (P<0.001), but not between stage II and III (P=0.706, 0.329, and 0.229, respectively). A positive correlation was detected between the clinical stage and difference in subcutaneous area of limbs (rho =0.752, P<0.001), S/B (rho =0.747, P<0.001), S/M (rho =0.709, P<0.001), and subcutaneous (rho =0.723, P<0.001). For staging primary LEL, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated that the difference in subcutaneous area of limbs had the best discrimination ability among parameters [area under the ROC curve (AUC) =0.950; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.875–0.987; sensitivity: 95.45%; specificity: 84.85%], followed by S/B (AUC =0.930; 95% CI: 0.848–0.975; sensitivity: 77.27%; specificity: 93.94%) and S/M (AUC =0.895; 95% CI: 0.804–0.953; sensitivity: 77.27%; specificity: 90.91%). The ROC curves indicated that subcutaneous area (AUC =0.927; 95% CI: 0.844–0.974; sensitivity: 84.09%, specificity: 90.91%) and total (AUC =0.852; 95% CI: 0.753–0.923; sensitivity: 70.45%; specificity: 90.91%) also had discrimination ability between stage I and II. Conclusions The measurement of the soft tissue area of the calf may be used as an auxiliary method for staging primary LEL. For patients with unilateral primary LEL, the difference in subcutaneous area of limbs could be a specific indicator to distinguish clinical stage I from II.
| S-EPMC10423363 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo explore whether patient-reported lymphedema-related symptoms, as measured by the Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ), are associated with a patient-reported diagnosis of lymphedema of the lower extremity (LLE) and limb volume change (LVC) in patients who have undergone radical surgery, including lymphadenectomy, for endometrial, cervical, or vulvar cancer on Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study 244.MethodsPatients completed the baseline and at least one post-surgery GCLQ and LVC assessment. The 20-item GCLQ measures seven symptom clusters-aching, heaviness, infection-related, numbness, physical functioning, general swelling, and limb swelling. LLE was defined as a patient self-reported LLE diagnosis on the GCLQ. LVC was measured by volume calculations based on circumferential measurements. A linear mixed model was fitted for change in symptom cluster scores and GCLQ total score and adjusted for disease sites and assessment time.ResultsOf 987 eligible patients, 894 were evaluable (endometrial, 719; cervical, 136; vulvar, 39). Of these, 14% reported an LLE diagnosis (endometrial, 11%; cervical, 18%; vulvar, 38%). Significantly more patients diagnosed versus not diagnosed with LLE reported ≥4-point increase from baseline on the GCLQ total score (p < 0.001). Changes from baseline were significantly larger on all GCLQ symptom cluster scores in patients with LLE compared to those without LLE. An LVC increment of >10% was significantly associated with reported general swelling (p < 0.001), heaviness (p = 0.005), infection-related symptoms (p = 0.002), and physical function (p = 0.006).ConclusionsPatient-reported symptoms, as measured by the GCLQ, discerned those with and without a patient-reported LLE diagnosis and demonstrated predictive value. The GCLQ combined with LVC may enhance our ability to identify LLE.
| S-EPMC6900449 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To explore potential therapeutic targets for diabetic vascular complications, we first conducted an unbiased screen at the protein level with lower extremity vessels from non-diabetic control individuals and from patients with type 2 diabetes by LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry). A total of 1093 proteins were identified by MS, of which 116 proteins were differentially expressed (false discovery rate q-value < 0.05; fold change > 1.5 or < 1/1.5) in the 3 diabetic samples (DM) compared with 3 non-diabetic controls (Non-DM), including 92 upregulated and 24 downregulated proteins.
2025-09-05 | PXD067778 | Pride
Project description:BACKGROUND:The sensitivity and specificity of exercise testing have never been studied simultaneously against an objective quantification of arterial stenosis. Aims were to define the sensitivity and specificity of several exercise tests to detect peripheral artery disease (PAD), and to assess whether or not defined criteria defined in patients suspected of having a PAD show a difference dependent on the resting ABI. METHODS:In this prospective study, consecutive patients with exertional limb pain referred to our vascular center were included. All patients had an ABI, a treadmill exercise-oximetry test, a second treadmill test (both 10% slope; 3.2km/h speed) with post-exercise pressures, and a computed-tomography-angiography (CTA). The receiver-operating-characteristic curve was used to define a cut-off point corresponding to the best area under the curve (AUC; [CI95%]) to detect arterial stenosis ≥50% as determined by the CTA. RESULTS:Sixty-three patients (61+/-11 years-old) were included. Similar AUCs from 0.72[0.63-0.79] to 0.83[0.75-0.89] were found for the different tests in the overall population. To detect arterial stenosis ≥50%, cut-off values of ABI, post-exercise ABI, post-exercise ABI decrease, post-exercise ankle pressure decrease, and distal delta from rest oxygen pressure (DROP) index were ≤0.91, ≤0.52, ≥43%, ≥20mmHg and ≤-15mmHg, respectively (p<0.01). In the subset of patients with an ABI >0.91, cut-off values of post-exercise ABI decrease (AUC = 0.67[0.53-0.78]), and DROP (AUC = 0.67[0.53-0.78]) were ≥18.5%, and ≤-15mmHg respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSION:Resting ABI is as accurate as exercise testing in patients with exertional limb pain. Specific exercise testing cut-off values should be used in patients with normal ABI to diagnose PAD.
| S-EPMC6597112 | biostudies-literature