Project description:Background: Sepsis, a global health challenge, necessitates a nuanced understanding of modifiable factors for effective prevention and intervention. The role of trace micronutrients in sepsis pathogenesis remains unclear, and their potential connection, especially with genetic influences, warrants exploration. Methods: We employed Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to assess the causal relationship between genetically predicted blood levels of nine micronutrients (calcium, β-carotene, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, vitamin C, vitamin B6, vitamin D, and zinc) and sepsis susceptibility, severity, and subtypes. The instrumental variables for circulating micronutrients were derived from nine published genome-wide association studies (GWAS). In the primary MR analysis, we utilized summary statistics for sepsis from two independent databases (UK Biobank and FinnGen consortium), for initial and replication analyses. Subsequently, a meta-analysis was conducted to merge the results. In secondary MR analyses, we assessed the causal effects of micronutrients on five sepsis-related outcomes (severe sepsis, sepsis-related death within 28 days, severe sepsis-related death within 28 days, streptococcal septicaemia, and puerperal sepsis), incorporating multiple sensitivity analyses and multivariable MR to address potential heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Results: The study revealed a significant causal link between genetically forecasted zinc levels and reduced risk of severe sepsis-related death within 28 days (odds ratio [OR] = 0.450; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.263, 0.770; p = 3.58 × 10-3). Additionally, suggestive associations were found for iron (increased risk of sepsis), β-carotene (reduced risk of sepsis death) and vitamin C (decreased risk of puerperal sepsis). No significant connections were observed for other micronutrients. Conclusion: Our study highlighted that zinc may emerges as a potential protective factor against severe sepsis-related death within 28 days, providing theoretical support for supplementing zinc in high-risk critically ill sepsis patients. In the future, larger-scale data are needed to validate our findings.
Project description:Background: Several observational studies have demonstrated that significantly rising circulating adipokine levels are pervasive in preeclampsia or eclampsia disorder (or preeclampsia toxemia (PET)). However, it remains unclear whether this relationship is causal. In this study, we sought to elucidate the causal effects of circulating adipokine levels on PET. Methods: Summary-level data and independent genetic variants strongly associated with common adipokine molecule (adiponectin, leptin, resistin, sOB-R, and PAI-1) levels were drawn from public genome-wide association study (GWASs). Additionally, the corresponding effects between instrumental variables and PET outcomes were acquired from the FinnGen consortium, including 4,743 cases and 136,325 controls of European ancestry. Subsequently, an inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach was applied for the principal two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) and multivariable MR (MVMR) analyses. Various complementary sensitivity analyses were then carried out to determine the robustness of our models. Results: The results of the IVW method did not reveal any causal relationship shared across genetically predisposed adipokine levels and PET risk (for adiponectin, OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.65-1.13, p = 0.274). Additionally, no significant associations were identified after taking into account five circulating adipokines in MVMR research. Complementary sensitivity analysis also supported no significant associations between them. In the reverse MR analysis, genetically predicted PET risk showed a suggestive association with elevating PAI-1 levels by the IVW method (Beta = 0.120, 95% CI: 0.014, 0.227, p = 0.026). Furthermore, there were no strong correlations between genetic liability to PET and other adipokine levels (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Our MR study did not provide robust evidence supporting the causal role of common circulating adipokine levels in PET, whereas genetically predicted PET may instrumentally affect PAI-1 levels. These findings suggest that PAI-1 may be a useful biomarker for monitoring the diagnosis or therapy of PET rather than a therapeutic target for PET.
Project description:BackgroundStudies have shown an association between depression and circulating metabolites, but the causal relationship between them has not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the causal relationship between circulating metabolites and depression and to explore the role of circulating metabolites in depression.MethodsIn this study, the top single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with circulating metabolites (n = 24,925) and depression (n = 322,580) were obtained based on the publicly available genome-wide association study using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). SNP estimates were summarized through inverse variance weighted, MR Egger, weighted median, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier, and "leave-one-out" methods.ResultsApolipoprotein A-I (OR 0.990, 95% CI 981-0.999) and glutamine (OR 0.985, 95% CI 0.972-0.997) had protective causal effects on depression, whereas acetoacetate (OR 1.021, 95% CI 1.009-1.034), glycoproteins (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.000-1.009), isoleucine (OR 1.013, 95% CI 1.002-1.024), and urea (OR 1.020, 95% CI 1.000-1.039) had an anti-protective effect on depression. Reversed MR showed no effect of depression on the seven circulating metabolites.ConclusionIn this study, MR analysis showed that apolipoprotein A-I and glutamine had a protective effect on depression, and acetoacetate, glycoprotein, isoleucine, glucose, and urea may be risk factors for depression. Therefore, further research must be conducted to translate the findings into practice.
Project description:Observational data from China, the United States, France, and Italy suggest that chronological age is an adverse COVID-19 outcome risk factor, with older patients having a higher severity and mortality rate than younger patients. Most studies have gotten the same view. However, the role of aging in COVID-19 adverse effects is unclear. To more accurately assess the effect of aging on adverse COVID-19, we conducted this bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Epigenetic clocks and telomere length were used as biological indicators of aging. Data on epigenetic age (PhenoAge, GrimAge, Intrinsic HorvathAge, and HannumAge) were derived from an analysis of biological aging based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data. The telomere length data are derived from GWAS and the susceptibility and severity data are derived from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (HGI). Firstly, epigenetic age and telomere length were used as exposures, and following a screen for appropriate instrumental variables, we used random-effects inverse variance weighting (IVW) for the main analysis, and combined it with other analysis methods (e.g., MR Egger, Weighted median, simple mode, Weighted mode) and multiple sensitivity analysis (heterogeneity analysis, horizontal multiplicity analysis, "leave-one-out" analysis). For reducing false-positive rates, Bonferroni corrected significance thresholds were used. A reverse Mendelian randomization analysis was subsequently performed with COVID-19 susceptibility and severity as the exposure. The results of the MR analysis showed no significant differences in susceptibility to aging and COVID-19. It might suggest that aging is not a risk factor for COVID-19 infection (P-values are in the range of 0.05-0.94). According to the results of our analysis, we found that aging was not a risk factor for the increased severity of COVID-19 (P > 0.05). However, severe COVID-19 can cause telomere lengths to become shorter (beta = -0.01; se = 0.01; P = 0.02779). In addition to this, severe COVID-19 infection can slow the acceleration of the epigenetic clock "GrimAge" (beta = -0.24, se = 0.07, P = 0.00122), which may be related to the closely correlation of rs35081325 and COVID-19 severity. Our study provides partial evidence for the causal effects of aging on the susceptibility and severity of COVID-19.
Project description:BackgroundObservational studies have reported an association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk and thyroid dysfunction, but without a clear causal relationship. We attempted to evaluate the association between thyroid function and COVID-19 risk using a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.MethodsSummary statistics on the characteristics of thyroid dysfunction (hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism) were obtained from the ThyroidOmics Consortium. Genome-wide association study statistics for COVID-19 susceptibility and its severity were obtained from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative, and severity phenotypes included hospitalization and very severe disease in COVID-19 participants. The inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary analysis method, supplemented by the weighted-median (WM), MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO methods. Results were adjusted for Bonferroni correction thresholds.ResultsThe forward MR estimates show no effect of thyroid dysfunction on COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. The reverse MR found that COVID-19 susceptibility was the suggestive risk factor for hypothyroidism (IVW: OR = 1.577, 95% CI = 1.065-2.333, P = 0.022; WM: OR = 1.527, 95% CI = 1.042-2.240, P = 0.029), and there was lightly association between COVID-19 hospitalized and hypothyroidism (IVW: OR = 1.151, 95% CI = 1.004-1.319, P = 0.042; WM: OR = 1.197, 95% CI = 1.023-1.401, P = 0.023). There was no evidence supporting the association between any phenotype of COVID-19 and hyperthyroidism.ConclusionOur results identified that COVID-19 might be the potential risk factor for hypothyroidism. Therefore, patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 should strengthen the monitoring of thyroid function.
Project description:Objective: Inflammatory cytokines disturbance is the main result of immune dysregulation, which is widely described in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the potential causal relationship between these two factors has not been discovered. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the causal relationship between inflammatory cytokines and MDD risk by using the two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Method: Two genetic instruments obtained from publicly available gene profile data were utilized for the analysis. We obtained the genetic variation data of 41 inflammatory cytokines from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) meta-analysis of 8293 individuals of Finnish descent. The MDD data, including 135,458 MDD cases and 344,901 controls, were obtained from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Database. For the Mendelian randomization (MR) estimation, several methods were employed, namely, MR-Egger regression, inverse-variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO) methods. Result: A causal relationship was identified between the genetically proxied levels of Interleukin (IL) -18, IL-1β, and Regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) and the risk of MDD (OR = 0.968, 95%CI = 0.938, 0.998, p = 0.036; OR = 0.875, 95%CI = 0.787, 0.971, p = 0.012; OR = 0.947, 95%CI = 0.902, 0.995, p = 0.03; respectively). However, our Mendelian randomization (MR) estimates provided no causality of MDD on inflammatory cytokines. Conclusion: Our study elucidates the connection between inflammatory cytokines and MDD by using MR analysis, thereby enhancing our comprehension of the potential mechanisms. By identifying these associations, our findings hold substantial implications for the development of more effective treatments aimed at improving patient outcomes. However, further investigation is required to fully comprehend the exact biological mechanisms involved.
Project description:BackgroundObservational researches reported the underlying correlation of plasma myeloperoxidase (MPO) concentration with respiratory tract infections (RTIs), but their causality remained unclear. Here, we examined the cause-effect relation between plasma MPO levels and RTIs.Materials and methodsDatasets of plasma MPO levels were from the Folkersen et al. study (n = 21,758) and INTERVAL study (n = 3,301). Summarized data for upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) (2,795 cases and 483,689 controls) and lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) (585 cases and 430,780 controls) were from the UK Biobank database. The primary method for Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was the inverse variance weighted approach, with MR-Egger and weighted median methods as supplements. Cochrane's Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outliers global test, funnel plots, and leave-one-out analysis were used for sensitivity analysis.ResultsWe found that plasma MPO levels were positively associated with URTI (odds ratio (OR) = 1.135; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.011-1.274; P=0.032) and LRTI (ICU) (OR = 1.323; 95% CI = 1.006-1.739; P=0.045). The consistent impact direction is shown when additional plasma MPO level genome-wide association study datasets are used (URTI: OR = 1.158; 95% CI = 1.072-1.251; P < 0.001; LRTI (ICU): OR = 1.216; 95% CI = 1.020-1.450; P=0.030). There was no evidence of a causal effect of URTI and LRTI (ICU) on plasma MPO concentration in the reverse analysis (P > 0.050). The sensitivity analysis revealed no violations of MR presumptions.ConclusionsPlasma MPO levels may causally affect the risks of URTI and LRTI (ICU). In contrast, the causal role of URTI and LRTI (ICU) on plasma MPO concentration was not supported in our MR analysis. Further studies are needed to identify the relationship between RTIs and plasma MPO levels.
Project description:BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which since 2019 has caused over 5 million deaths to date. The pathogenicity of the virus is highly variable ranging from asymptomatic to fatal. Evidence from experimental and observational studies suggests that circulating micronutrients may affect COVID-19 outcomes.ObjectivesTo complement and inform observational studies, we investigated the associations of genetically predicted concentrations of 12 micronutrients (β-carotene, calcium, copper, folate, iron, magnesium, phosphorus, selenium, vitamin B-6, vitamin B-12, vitamin D, and zinc) with SARS-CoV-2 infection risk and COVID-19 severity using Mendelian randomization (MR).MethodsTwo-sample MR was conducted using 87,870 individuals of European descent with a COVID-19 diagnosis and 2,210,804 controls from the COVID-19 host genetics initiative. Inverse variance-weighted MR analyses were performed with sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of potential violations of MR assumptions.ResultsCompared to the general population, nominally significant associations were noted for higher genetically predicted vitamin B-6 (Odds ratio per standard deviation [OR SD]: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00, 1.13; p-value = 0.036) and lower magnesium concentrations (OR SD: 0.33; 95%CI: 0.11, 0.96; P = 0.042) with COVID-19 infection risk. However, the association for magnesium was not consistent in some sensitivity analyses, and sensitivity analyses could not be performed for vitamin B-6 as only two genetic instruments were available. Genetically predicted levels of calcium, folate, β-carotene, copper, iron, vitamin B-12, vitamin D, selenium, phosphorus, or zinc were not associated with the outcomes from COVID-19 disease.ConclusionThese results, though based only on genetically predicated circulating micronutrient concentrations, provide scant evidence for possible associations of micronutrients with COVID-19 outcomes.