Dataset Information

Serum vitamin D, vitamin D binding protein, and risk of colorectal cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

We previously reported a positive association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and colorectal cancer risk. To further elucidate this association, we examined the molar ratio of 25(OH)D to vitamin D binding protein (DBP), the primary 25(OH)D transport protein, and whether DBP modified the association between 25(OH)D and colorectal cancer risk.

Methods

In a nested case-control study within the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study, controls were 1∶1 matched to 416 colorectal cancer cases based on age and date of blood collection. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for quartiles of 25(OH)D, DBP, and the molar ratio of 25(OH)D:DBP, a proxy for free, unbound circulating 25(OH)D.

Results

Comparing highest to lowest quartiles, DBP was not associated with colorectal cancer risk (OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.58, 1.42, p for trend = 0.58); however, a positive risk association was observed for the molar ratio of 25(OH)D:DBP (OR = 1.44; 95% CI: 0.92, 2.26, p for trend = 0.04). In stratified analyses, the positive association between 25(OH)D and colorectal cancer was stronger among men with DBP levels above the median (OR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.07, 3.36, p for trend = 0.01) than below the median (OR = 1.20; 95% CI: 0.68, 2.12, p for trend = 0.87), although the interaction was not statistically significant (p for interaction = 0.24).

Conclusion

Circulating DBP may influence the association between 25(OH)D and colorectal cancer in male smokers, with the suggestion of a stronger positive association in men with higher DBP concentrations. This finding should be examined in other populations, especially those that include women and non-smokers.

SUBMITTER: Anic GM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4103858 | biostudies-literature | 2014

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Serum vitamin D, vitamin D binding protein, and risk of colorectal cancer.

Anic Gabriella M GM Weinstein Stephanie J SJ Mondul Alison M AM Männistö Satu S Albanes Demetrius D

PloS one 20140718 7

<h4>Background</h4>We previously reported a positive association between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and colorectal cancer risk. To further elucidate this association, we examined the molar ratio of 25(OH)D to vitamin D binding protein (DBP), the primary 25(OH)D transport protein, and whether DBP modified the association between 25(OH)D and colorectal cancer risk.<h4>Methods</h4>In a nested case-control study within the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study, controls we ...[more]

PMID: 25036524

Similar Datasets

Project description:Associations between vitamin D biochemical status and cancer may be modified by vitamin D binding protein isoforms which are encoded by GC (group-specific component). We examined interactions between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], the Gc isoforms Gc1-1, Gc1-2, and Gc2-2, and cancer risk within the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial cohort based on 3,795 cases and 3,856 controls. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of cancer risk according to 25(OH)D quantiles, stratified by Gc isoform. Separately, the GC-cancer risk association was examined using proportional hazards regression among 109,746 individuals with genetic data and 26,713 diagnosed with cancer. Specific vitamin D binding protein isoform subtypes were delineated and analyzed, including Gc1-1 subtypes (Gc1s-Gc1s, Gc1f-Gc1s, and Gc1f-Gc1f) and Gc2 subtypes (Gc1s-Gc2, Gc1f-Gc2, and Gc2-Gc2). For most cancers, the GC genotype did not modify the risk associations for 25(OH)D; e.g., the OR for high vs. low vitamin D quintile was 1.09 (0.89-1.33) for overall cancer risk among individuals with the Gc1-1 isoform and 1.04 (0.83-1.31) among those with either the Gc1-2 or Gc2-2 isoforms. ORs for high compared to low vitamin D tertile for colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancer among those with the Gc1-1 vs. any Gc2 isoforms were, respectively, 0.60 vs. 0.73, 1.96 vs. 1.03, 1.30 vs. 1.18, and 1.19 vs. 1.22 (all p-interaction ≥0.36). However, GC qualitatively modified the vitamin D-bladder cancer risk association: OR = 1.70 (95% CI 0.96-2.98) among those with the Gc1-1 isoform and 0.52 (0.28-0.96) among those with any Gc2 isoforms (p-interaction = 0.03). When modeled without regard for 25(OH)D, Gc isoforms were generally not associated with cancer risk, although melanoma risk was significantly lower among individuals with the "f" subtype of the Gc1-1 isoform, specifically HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.70-0.98) for Gc1f-1s and 0.67 (0.45-1.00) for Gc1f-1f, compared to individuals with the Gc1s-Gc1s isoform. Vitamin D binding protein genetic isoforms may be associated with melanoma risk but do not modify the association between vitamin D status and cancer, with the possible exception of bladder cancer.

Project description:BackgroundHigh circulating levels of vitamin D (25(OH)D) are suggested to reduce the risk of urinary bladder cancer (BC), but the evidence is weak, and several studies lack sufficient adjustment for potential confounders (e.g., smoking, body mass index (BMI), and physical activity). Moreover, few studies have investigated the role of vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) in this context. We conducted a matched nested case-control study including 378 cases and 378 controls within the Norwegian population-based Janus cohort, using serum collected 5-41 years prior to diagnosis, to study 25(OH)D and BC risk, by taking circulating DBP into account.MethodsCox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), for 25(OH)D, DBP, and the molar ratio of 25(OH)D:DBP, an estimate of unbound (free) 25(OH)D levels. We adjusted for smoking (status and pack-years), BMI, physical activity, education and (mutually) for 25(OH)D and DBP. Restricted cubic splines were employed to examine nonlinear associations.ResultsHigh optimal levels of circulating 25(OH)D (≥100 nmol/L) (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.64) were associated with decreased BC risk, when compared with insufficient concentrations (50-74 nmol/L). This association was less pronounced for optimal levels (75-99 nmol/L) (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.47-1.01). Moreover, estimated free 25(OH)D, was associated with decreased BC risk for molar ratio 17-21 (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.97) and ≥22 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.82), compared to molar ratio 11-16. The HR function for BC risk was not linear, rather reversed u-shaped, with the highest HR at 62.5 nmol/L and 13.5 molar ratio, respectively.ConclusionHigh levels of total and estimated free 25(OH)D were associated with reduced risk of BC, compared with insufficient concentrations. DBP was not associated with BC risk. We did not observe any impact of DBP or any of the studied lifestyle factors on the association between 25(OH)D and BC.

Dataset Information

Serum vitamin D, vitamin D binding protein, and risk of colorectal cancer.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Serum vitamin D, vitamin D binding protein, and risk of colorectal cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets