Dataset Information

PATHOME: an algorithm for accurately detecting differentially expressed subpathways.

ABSTRACT: The translation of high-throughput gene expression data into biologically meaningful information remains a bottleneck. We developed a novel computational algorithm, PATHOME, for detecting differentially expressed biological pathways. This algorithm employs straightforward statistical tests to evaluate the significance of differential expression patterns along subpathways. Applying it to gene expression data sets of gastric cancer (GC), we compared its performance with those of other leading programs. Based on a literature-driven reference set, PATHOME showed greater consistency in identifying known cancer-related pathways. For the WNT pathway uniquely identified by PATHOME, we validated its involvement in gastric carcinogenesis through experimental perturbation of both cell lines and animal models. We identified HNF4α-WNT5A regulation in the cross-talk between the AMPK metabolic pathway and the WNT signaling pathway, and further identified WNT5A as a potential therapeutic target for GC. We have demonstrated PATHOME to be a powerful tool, with improved sensitivity for identifying disease-related dysregulated pathways.

SUBMITTER: Nam S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4182295 | biostudies-literature | 2014 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

PATHOME: an algorithm for accurately detecting differentially expressed subpathways.

Nam S S Chang H R HR Kim K-T KT Kook M-C MC Hong D D Kwon C H CH Jung H R HR Park H S HS Powis G G Liang H H Park T T Kim Y H YH

Oncogene 20140331 41

The translation of high-throughput gene expression data into biologically meaningful information remains a bottleneck. We developed a novel computational algorithm, PATHOME, for detecting differentially expressed biological pathways. This algorithm employs straightforward statistical tests to evaluate the significance of differential expression patterns along subpathways. Applying it to gene expression data sets of gastric cancer (GC), we compared its performance with those of other leading prog ...[more]

PMID: 24681952

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMicroarray experiments are often performed with a small number of biological replicates, resulting in low statistical power for detecting differentially expressed genes and concomitant high false positive rates. While increasing sample size can increase statistical power and decrease error rates, with too many samples, valuable resources are not used efficiently. The issue of how many replicates are required in a typical experimental system needs to be addressed. Of particular interest is the difference in required sample sizes for similar experiments in inbred vs. outbred populations (e.g. mouse and rat vs. human).ResultsWe hypothesize that if all other factors (assay protocol, microarray platform, data pre-processing) were equal, fewer individuals would be needed for the same statistical power using inbred animals as opposed to unrelated human subjects, as genetic effects on gene expression will be removed in the inbred populations. We apply the same normalization algorithm and estimate the variance of gene expression for a variety of cDNA data sets (humans, inbred mice and rats) comparing two conditions. Using one sample, paired sample or two independent sample t-tests, we calculate the sample sizes required to detect a 1.5-, 2-, and 4-fold changes in expression level as a function of false positive rate, power and percentage of genes that have a standard deviation below a given percentile.ConclusionsFactors that affect power and sample size calculations include variability of the population, the desired detectable differences, the power to detect the differences, and an acceptable error rate. In addition, experimental design, technical variability and data pre-processing play a role in the power of the statistical tests in microarrays. We show that the number of samples required for detecting a 2-fold change with 90% probability and a p-value of 0.01 in humans is much larger than the number of samples commonly used in present day studies, and that far fewer individuals are needed for the same statistical power when using inbred animals rather than unrelated human subjects.

Project description:BackgroundIdentification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under different experimental conditions is an important task in many microarray studies. However, choosing which method to use for a particular application is problematic because its performance depends on the evaluation metric, the dataset, and so on. In addition, when using the Affymetrix GeneChip(R) system, researchers must select a preprocessing algorithm from a number of competing algorithms such as MAS, RMA, and DFW, for obtaining expression-level measurements. To achieve optimal performance for detecting DEGs, a suitable combination of gene selection method and preprocessing algorithm needs to be selected for a given probe-level dataset.ResultsWe introduce a new fold-change (FC)-based method, the weighted average difference method (WAD), for ranking DEGs. It uses the average difference and relative average signal intensity so that highly expressed genes are highly ranked on the average for the different conditions. The idea is based on our observation that known or potential marker genes (or proteins) tend to have high expression levels. We compared WAD with seven other methods; average difference (AD), FC, rank products (RP), moderated t statistic (modT), significance analysis of microarrays (samT), shrinkage t statistic (shrinkT), and intensity-based moderated t statistic (ibmT). The evaluation was performed using a total of 38 different binary (two-class) probe-level datasets: two artificial "spike-in" datasets and 36 real experimental datasets. The results indicate that WAD outperforms the other methods when sensitivity and specificity are considered simultaneously: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for WAD was the highest on average for the 38 datasets. The gene ranking for WAD was also the most consistent when subsets of top-ranked genes produced from three different preprocessed data (MAS, RMA, and DFW) were compared. Overall, WAD performed the best for MAS-preprocessed data and the FC-based methods (AD, WAD, FC, or RP) performed well for RMA and DFW-preprocessed data.ConclusionWAD is a promising alternative to existing methods for ranking DEGs with two classes. Its high performance should increase researchers' confidence in microarray analyses.

Dataset Information

PATHOME: an algorithm for accurately detecting differentially expressed subpathways.

Publications

PATHOME: an algorithm for accurately detecting differentially expressed subpathways.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets