Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study.


ABSTRACT: The metabo-ring initiative brought together five nuclear magnetic resonance instruments (NMR) and 11 different mass spectrometers with the objective of assessing the reliability of untargeted metabolomics approaches in obtaining comparable metabolomics profiles. This was estimated by measuring the proportion of common spectral information extracted from the different LCMS and NMR platforms. Biological samples obtained from 2 different conditions were analysed by the partners using their own in-house protocols. Test #1 examined urine samples from adult volunteers either spiked or not spiked with 32 metabolite standards. Test #2 involved a low biological contrast situation comparing the plasma of rats fed a diet either supplemented or not with vitamin D. The spectral information from each instrument was assembled into separate statistical blocks. Correlations between blocks (e.g., instruments) were examined (RV coefficients) along with the structure of the common spectral information (common components and specific weights analysis). In addition, in Test #1, an outlier individual was blindly introduced, and its identification by the various platforms was evaluated. Despite large differences in the number of spectral features produced after post-processing and the heterogeneity of the analytical conditions and the data treatment, the spectral information both within (NMR and LCMS) and across methods (NMR vs. LCMS) was highly convergent (from 64 to 91 % on average). No effect of the LCMS instrumentation (TOF, QTOF, LTQ-Orbitrap) was noted. The outlier individual was best detected and characterised by LCMS instruments. In conclusion, untargeted metabolomics analyses report consistent information within and across instruments of various technologies, even without prior standardisation.

SUBMITTER: Martin JC 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4475541 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study.

Martin Jean-Charles JC   Maillot Matthieu M   Mazerolles Gérard G   Verdu Alexandre A   Lyan Bernard B   Migné Carole C   Defoort Catherine C   Canlet Cecile C   Junot Christophe C   Guillou Claude C   Manach Claudine C   Jabob Daniel D   Bouveresse Delphine Jouan-Rimbaud DJ   Paris Estelle E   Pujos-Guillot Estelle E   Jourdan Fabien F   Giacomoni Franck F   Courant Frédérique F   Favé Gaëlle G   Le Gall Gwenaëlle G   Chassaigne Hubert H   Tabet Jean-Claude JC   Martin Jean-Francois JF   Antignac Jean-Philippe JP   Shintu Laetitia L   Defernez Marianne M   Philo Mark M   Alexandre-Gouaubau Marie-Cécile MC   Amiot-Carlin Marie-Josephe MJ   Bossis Mathilde M   Triba Mohamed N MN   Stojilkovic Natali N   Banzet Nathalie N   Molinié Roland R   Bott Romain R   Goulitquer Sophie S   Caldarelli Stefano S   Rutledge Douglas N DN  

Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society 20141014 4


The metabo-ring initiative brought together five nuclear magnetic resonance instruments (NMR) and 11 different mass spectrometers with the objective of assessing the reliability of untargeted metabolomics approaches in obtaining comparable metabolomics profiles. This was estimated by measuring the proportion of common spectral information extracted from the different LCMS and NMR platforms. Biological samples obtained from 2 different conditions were analysed by the partners using their own in-h  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10667725 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6918145 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5017021 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7281133 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7886748 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5455767 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10733301 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10186604 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10456436 | biostudies-literature