Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To examine trends in methodological quality of studies of endstage renal disease risk in lupus nephritis, 1970-2015.Methods
We assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies, and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool for trials.Results
In observational studies, description of enrollment criteria was high but decreased over time. Adequacy of followup was low but improved. Inception cohorts and community-based studies were uncommon. Trials had low risk of bias in blinding and selective outcome reporting but most had unclear risks in sequence generation and allocation concealment.Conclusion
Methodological quality was mixed, with limited improvement over time.
SUBMITTER: Tektonidou MG
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5413417 | biostudies-literature | 2017 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Tektonidou Maria G MG Ward Michael M MM
The Journal of rheumatology 20170215 5
<h4>Objective</h4>To examine trends in methodological quality of studies of endstage renal disease risk in lupus nephritis, 1970-2015.<h4>Methods</h4>We assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies, and the Cochrane Collaboration's risk-of-bias tool for trials.<h4>Results</h4>In observational studies, description of enrollment criteria was high but decreased over time. Adequacy of followup was low but improved. Inception cohorts and community-based studies were unc ...[more]