Dataset Information

Adjunct rasagiline to treat Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations: a randomized, double-blind study in China.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The use of adjunct rasagiline in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations is supported by findings from large-scale clinical studies. This study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of adjunct rasagiline in Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease, as a product registration study.

Methods

This 16-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, placebo-controlled study of rasagiline 1 mg/day included levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change from baseline in total daily OFF time over 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints were Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I), and change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Activities of daily living (ADL) and Motor scores. Patient well-being (EQ-5D), and the frequency of adverse events were also assessed.

Results

In total, 324 levodopa-treated patients were randomized to rasagiline 1 mg/day (n = 165) or placebo (n = 159). Over 16 weeks, rasagiline statistically significantly reduced the mean [95% confidence interval] total daily OFF time versus placebo (- 0.5 h [- 0.92, - 0.07]; p = 0.023). There were also statistically significant improvements versus placebo in CGI-I (- 0.4 points [- 0.61, - 0.22]; p < 0.001), UPDRS-ADL OFF (- 1.0 points [- 1.75, - 0.27]; p = 0.008), and UPDRS-Motor ON (- 1.6 points [- 3.05, - 0.14]; p = 0.032) scores, as well as the EQ-5D utility index (p < 0.05). Rasagiline was safe and well tolerated.

Conclusions

In levodopa-treated Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations, adjunct rasagiline 1 mg/day statistically significantly reduced OFF time, and improved daily function and overall well-being, versus placebo. Consistent with findings in other countries, adjunct rasagiline was proven efficacious and well tolerated in Chinese patients.

Trial registration number

NCT01479530. Registered 22 November 2011.

SUBMITTER: Zhang Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6026338 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Adjunct rasagiline to treat Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations: a randomized, double-blind study in China.

Zhang Zhenxin Z Shao Ming M Chen Shengdi S Liu Chunfeng C Peng Rong R Li Yansheng Y Wang Jian J Zhu Suiqiang S Qu Qiumin Q Zhang Xiaoying X Chen Haibo H Sun Xiangru X Wang Yanping Y Sun Shenggang S Zhang Baorong B Li Jimei J Pan Xiaoping X Zhao Gang G

Translational neurodegeneration 20180630

<h4>Background</h4>The use of adjunct rasagiline in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations is supported by findings from large-scale clinical studies. This study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of adjunct rasagiline in Chinese patients with Parkinson's disease, as a product registration study.<h4>Methods</h4>This 16-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, placebo-controlled study of rasagiline 1 mg/day included levodopa-treated pa ...[more]

PMID: 29988514

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCVN424 is a GPR6 inverse agonist that provides selective pharmacological control of the indirect striatopallidal pathway. We assessed the safety and efficacy of CVN424 as an adjunctive treatment to levodopa for reducing OFF-time in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing motor-fluctuations.MethodsThis was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 21 sites across the United States to evaluate two doses of CVN424 (NCT04191577). Patients with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stages 2-4) who were on a stable dose of levodopa and experiencing ≥2 h of daily OFF-time were randomised (1:1:1) to receive either once-daily CVN424 (50 mg or 150 mg) or placebo for a 28-day treatment period. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. The key secondary endpoint was the change from baseline to Day 27 in OFF-time.FindingsThe study was conducted from December 23, 2019, to October 14, 2021. Out of 198 participants screened, 141 eligible participants were randomised to one of the three treatment groups (n = 47 per group), and 127 participants completed the 28-day treatment period. The most common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were headache (2% with CVN424 50 mg, 9% with CVN424 150 mg, and 2% with placebo) and nausea (4% with CVN424 50 mg, 6% with CVN424 150 mg and 2% with placebo). No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported. On Day 27, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) change from baseline in daily OFF-time was -1.3 ± 3.0 h in the CVN424 50 mg group, -1.6 ± 2.5 h in the CVN424 150 mg group, and -0.5 ± 2.9 h in the placebo group. The placebo-adjusted LS mean ± standard error (SE) treatment difference was significant for the CVN424 150 mg dose (1.3 ± 0.56 h, [95 CI% -2.41 to -0.19], nominal p = 0.02).InterpretationTreatment with CVN424 was safe and well-tolerated. Despite the short study duration and small sample size, the 150 mg CVN424 dose provided a clinically meaningful reduction in daily OFF-time. This study supports the development of CVN424 for the treatment of PD.FundingCerevance.

Project description:BackgroundRasagiline is a monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor used for Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment, but its effectiveness on Chinese patients is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rasagiline monotherapy in Chinese patients with early PD.MethodsA 26-weeks, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study has been performed at 15 sites in China and enrolled outpatients (≥35 years old) with idiopathic PD without a history of using any dopaminergic drugs. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive rasagiline 1 mg once daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was the change of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total score from baseline to 26 weeks treatment. Secondary endpoints included changes in UPDRS subscale scores from part I to III. Health status was assessed with the PD Questionnaire (PDQ)-39 and EuroQol-Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire. Safety profile was collected until 30 weeks after randomization.ResultsA total of 130 patients (n = 65/group) were recruited, and 127 (rasagiline, n = 64; placebo, n = 63) were included in the full analysis set. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The decrease in the mean UPDRS total score was greater in the rasagiline group than in the placebo group (- 3.18 ± 0.95 vs. - 0.18 ± 0.98, P = 0.025), and the mean UPDRS part I non-motor symptoms score (- 0.54 ± 0.15 vs. -0.08 ± 0.15, P = 0.003) were significantly decreased in the rasagiline group compared with placebo treated patients. An improvement trend was observed in the active treatment group for the subscales evaluation with parts II and III, while the difference to placebo was not statistically significant. Life quality assessed by the EQ-5D visual analog scale improved in the rasagiline group but worsened in placebo treated patients. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) was slightly lower in the rasagiline group (41.5%) than in the placebo group (46.2%).ConclusionsRasagiline is effective, safe, and well tolerated as monotherapy for the treatment of Chinese PD patients.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT01556165. Registered 13 Mar 2012.

Project description:Background: Pingchan granule (PCG) is a traditional Chinese medicine for treating Parkinson's disease (PD). Objective: This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of PCG for motor and non-motor symptoms of PD. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 292 participants with mild-to-moderate PD were included and followed for 36 weeks (24 week treatment, 12-week follow-up after intervention), randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive PCG or placebo. The primary outcomes included the severity of motor symptoms assessed by the Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part 3 (UPDRS-III) score and the rate of disease progression assessed by the total UPDRS score. Secondary outcomes included non-motor symptoms assessed using the Scale for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-Autonomic (SCOPA-AUT), Parkinson's disease Sleep Scale (PDSS), 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), UPDRS part 2 (UPDRS-II), and 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) scores. Assessments were done at baseline (T0), 12 weeks (T1), 24 weeks (T2), and 36 weeks (T3). Results: Generalized estimating equation analyses revealed that the PCG group had significantly better improvement in UPDRS-III score at T1, T2, and T3 [time-by-group interaction, T1: β, -0.92 (95% CI, -1.59--0.25; p = 0.01); T2: β, -2.08 (95% CI, -2.90--1.27; p < 0.001); T3: β, -4.54 (95% CI, -5.37--3.71; p < 0.001))]. The PCG group showed a greater decrease (rate of disease change) in the total UPDRS score between T0 and T2 [-2.23 (95% CI, -2.72--1.73; p < 0.001) points per week vs. -0.21 (95% CI, -0.80-0.39; p = 0.50) points per week in the placebo group, p < 0.001]. Ameliorations of SCOPA-AUT, PDSS, HAM-D, HAM-A, UPDRS-II, and PDQ-39 scores were also observed. Conclusion: PCG had a long-lasting and extensive symptomatic efficacy for both motor and non-motor symptoms of PD with good tolerance. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Register, ChiCTR-INR-17011949.

Project description:Background: Movement fluctuations are the main complication of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients receiving long-term levodopa (L-dopa) treatment. We compared and ranked the efficacy and safety of dopamine agonists (DAs) with regard to motor fluctuations by using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to quantify information from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods and Findings: We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis, and only RCTs comparing DAs for advanced PD were included. Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were systematically searched for relevant studies published until January 2021. Two reviewers independently extracted individual study data and evaluated studies for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Network meta-analyses using a Bayesian framework were used to calculate the related parameters. The pre-specified primary and secondary outcomes were efficacy ("ON" time without troublesome dyskinesia, "OFF" time, "ON" time, "UPDRS-III," and "UPDRS-II") and safety [treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and other adverse events] of DAs. The results are presented as the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve. A total of 20 RCTs assessing 6,560 patients were included. The general DA effects were ranked from high to low with respect to the amount of "ON" time without troublesome dyskinesia as follows: apomorphine (SUCRA = 97.08%), pramipexole_IR (probability = 79.00%), and ropinirole_PR (SUCRA = 63.92%). The general safety of DAs was ranked from high to low with respect to TEAE as follows: placebo (SUCRA = 74.49%), pramipexole_ER (SUCRA = 63.6%), sumanirole (SUCRA = 54.07%), and rotigotine (SUCRA = 53.84%). Conclusions: This network meta-analysis shows that apomorphine increased "ON" time without troublesome dyskinesia and decreased "OF" time for advanced PD patients. The addition of pramipexole, ropinirole, or rotigotine to levodopa treatment in advanced PD patients with motor fluctuations increased "ON" time without troublesome dyskinesia, improved the UPDRS III scores, and ultimately ameliorated the UPDRS II scores, thereby maximizing its benefit. This NMA of pramipexole, ropinirole, and rotigotine represents an effective treatment option and has an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced PD.

Project description:ObjectivesThis placebo-controlled, randomized study evaluated the efficacy and safety of opicapone 25-mg and 50-mg tablets in Japanese levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations.MethodsJapanese adults (n = 437, age 39-83 years) with Parkinson's disease (United Kingdom Parkinson's Disease Society criteria) received opicapone 25-mg (n = 145), opicapone 50-mg (n = 145), or placebo (n = 147) tablets over the double-blind treatment period (14-15 weeks). The primary efficacy assessment was change in OFF-time; secondary efficacy assessments included OFF/ON-time responders (≥1 hour change from baseline), total ON-time, ON-time with and without troublesome dyskinesia, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.ResultsThe least squares mean (standard error) change in OFF-time from baseline to the last visit was -0.42 (0.21) hour for the placebo group, -1.16 (0.22) hour for the opicapone 25 mg group, and -1.04 (0.21) hour for the opicapone 50 mg group. The percentage of ON-time responders, changes in total ON-time/ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale II (at OFF) all showed statistically significant improvements versus placebo for both opicapone tablet doses (P < 0.05). Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III (at ON) was improved versus placebo in patients who received opicapone 50 mg (P < 0.05). Adverse events were more common in patients treated with opicapone 25 mg (60.0%) or opicapone 50 mg (54.5%) versus placebo (48.3%). The most commonly reported adverse event was dyskinesia (placebo, 2.7%; opicapone 25 mg, 9.0%; opicapone 50 mg, 12.4%).ConclusionsIn Japanese patients, both opicapone 25 and 50 mg were significantly more effective than placebo with no dose-dependent difference in efficacy, and both doses were well tolerated. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Project description:BackgroundRasagiline is a selective, irreversible monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor used as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease and as an adjunct therapy to levodopa in Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations.ObjectivesThis meta-analysis aimed to provide updated evidence on the efficacy for motor and nonmotor symptoms and the safety of rasagiline/levodopa versus levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted (January 18-19, 2021) using PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials comparing rasagiline/levodopa versus placebo/levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations. Outcomes included change in wearing-off time, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)/Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS (MDS-UPDRS) II and III scores, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) summary index score. A random effect model was used to estimate the treatment effects.ResultsSix studies were included (1912 patients). Significant improvements in wearing-off time (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.92 to -0.09, p = 0.002), levodopa dosage (SMD: -0.18, 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.01, p = 0.041), UPDRS/MDS-UPDRS II (SMD: -0.39, 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.25, p < 0.0001), UPDRS/MDS-UPDRS III (SMD: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.16, p < 0.0001), and PDQ-39 summary index score (SMD: -0.21, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.04, p = 0.013) were observed with rasagiline/levodopa versus placebo/levodopa. The incidence of TEAEs did not differ between treatments (risk ratio: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.98-1.30, p = 0.093).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis further indicated the superiority of rasagiline/levodopa in improving motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, with a similar safety profile to that of levodopa in Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations.

Dataset Information

Adjunct rasagiline to treat Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations: a randomized, double-blind study in China.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Trial registration number

Publications

Adjunct rasagiline to treat Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations: a randomized, double-blind study in China.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets