Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Cost-effectiveness of telephone coaching for physically inactive ambulatory care hospital patients: economic evaluation alongside the Healthy4U randomised controlled trial.


ABSTRACT:

Objective

To assess whether telephone coaching is a cost-effective method for increasing physical activity and health-related quality of life for insufficiently active adults presenting to an ambulatory care clinic in a public hospital.

Design

An economic evaluation was performed alongside a randomised controlled trial.

Setting

Participants were recruited from an ambulatory care clinic in a public hospital in regional Australia.

Participants

Seventy-two adults (aged 18-69) deemed insufficiently physically active via self-report.

Interventions

Participants were randomised to either an intervention group that received an education session and eight sessions of telephone coaching over a 12-week period, or to a control group that received the education session only. The intervention used in the telephone coaching was integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural therapy.

Outcome measures

The primary health outcome was change in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), objectively measured via accelerometry. The secondary outcome was the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) determined by the 12-item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire. Outcome data were measured at baseline, postintervention (3 months) and follow-up (6 months). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for each outcome. Non-parametric bootstrapping techniques and sensitivity analyses were performed to account for uncertainty.

Results

The mean intervention cost was $279±$13 per person. At 6 months follow-up, relative to control, the intervention group undertook 18 more minutes of daily MVPA at an ICER of $15/min for each additional minute of MVPA. With regard to QALYs, the intervention yielded an ICER of $36 857 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses indicated that results were robust to varied assumptions.

Conclusion

Telephone coaching was a low-cost strategy for increasing MVPA and QALYs in insufficiently physically active ambulatory care hospital patients. Additional research could explore the potential economic impact of the intervention from a broader healthcare perspective.

Trial registration number

ANZCTR: ACTRN12616001331426.

SUBMITTER: Barrett S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6924747 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Cost-effectiveness of telephone coaching for physically inactive ambulatory care hospital patients: economic evaluation alongside the Healthy4U randomised controlled trial.

Barrett Stephen S   Begg Stephen S   O'Halloran Paul P   Kingsley Michael M  

BMJ open 20191210 12


<h4>Objective</h4>To assess whether telephone coaching is a cost-effective method for increasing physical activity and health-related quality of life for insufficiently active adults presenting to an ambulatory care clinic in a public hospital.<h4>Design</h4>An economic evaluation was performed alongside a randomised controlled trial.<h4>Setting</h4>Participants were recruited from an ambulatory care clinic in a public hospital in regional Australia.<h4>Participants</h4>Seventy-two adults (aged  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC1463186 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9043878 | biostudies-literature