Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Aim
To compare the microbiome of healthy (H) and diseased (P) peri-implant sites and determine the core peri-implant microbiome.Materials and methods
Submucosal biofilms from 32 H and 35 P sites were analysed using 16S rRNA sequencing (MiSeq, Illumina), QIIME and HOMINGS. Differences between groups were determined using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), t tests and Wilcoxon rank sum test and FDR-adjusted. The peri-implant core microbiome was determined.Results
PCoA showed partitioning between H and P at all taxonomic levels. Bacteroidetes, Spirochetes and Synergistetes were higher in P, while Actinobacteria prevailed in H (p < .05). Porphyromonas and Treponema were more abundant in P while Rothia and Neisseria were higher in H (p < .05). The core peri-implant microbiome contained Fusobacterium, Parvimonas and Campylobacter sp. T. denticola, and P. gingivalis levels were higher in P, as well as F. alocis, F. fastidiosum and T. maltophilum (p < .05).Conclusion
The peri-implantitis microbiome is commensal-depleted and pathogen-enriched, harbouring traditional and new pathogens. The core peri-implant microbiome harbours taxa from genera often associated with periodontal inflammation.
SUBMITTER: Sanz-Martin I
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7209775 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Journal of clinical periodontology 20171121 12
<h4>Aim</h4>To compare the microbiome of healthy (H) and diseased (P) peri-implant sites and determine the core peri-implant microbiome.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Submucosal biofilms from 32 H and 35 P sites were analysed using 16S rRNA sequencing (MiSeq, Illumina), QIIME and HOMINGS. Differences between groups were determined using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), t tests and Wilcoxon rank sum test and FDR-adjusted. The peri-implant core microbiome was determined.<h4>Results</h4>PCoA sh ...[more]